It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Why You Should Never Believe The Global Warming Hoax And Alarmism

page: 4
42
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 08:49 PM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

You do realize that on page one of this thread I posted the SABER study results, which has proven that the higher levels of C02 in the atmosphere actually cools the planet, thus debunking the entire thing...

NASA results, no less.

But science BAD now?

heh


edit on 3-6-2019 by Lumenari because: (no reason given)




posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 08:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: M5xaz

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: Lumenari


Notice something?
source


Yea... I noticed that the warmest year in the last 100 years was in 1930 and it is nowhere on that chart.

Guess you didn't notice that?



Right-on !

HA ! HA ! HA !

BRILLANT response!!

And aside from the fact that the numbers on that table from NASA are the "adjusted" temperature numbers, not the RAW data, which outfits like NASA and the University of East Anglia have fought in Court NOT to release the raw ( actual) data


Well, I kinda screwed up because it was in the 1930's and not 1930... I was on my cellphone driving 55 miles an hour in a one ton vehicle down a dirt lease road and was quoting from memory.

My bad.

HOWEVER.

NASA/NOAA fudged the data, it has been called out, yet people still quote the fudged numbers as gospel.

Much like the "97% consensus" thing... it irritates me that known fraudulent "facts" are still thrown around like they are a truth by people with an internet connection and a brain.




posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 09:03 PM
link   
a reply to: Justoneman

Ever heard of subduction?

The simple explanation is when tectonic plates push against each other the plate that is more dense is pushed downward into the earth/mantle and the other is push upwards. It's how mountain ridges are made.

I mean, it might be all nonsense but the mining industry seems to do alright. It's all about the relationship with the crust and the mantle and is a lot more complex than the simple explanation I gave.



posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 09:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: bobs_uruncle

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: bobs_uruncle

originally posted by: Allaroundyou
a reply to: Dfairlite

NASA earth observatory most definitely does not agree with what you just claimed.
here


All I read there was "Hey, someday soon we are gonna have to rape taxpayers further, so let's keep this scam alive."

I saw some pretty pictures, no evidence and a couple of alarmist statements without any standing.

Cheers - Dave


Rising Sea Levels Are Hurting Home Values in These 40 Cities - GOBankingRates.com

Sea level rise, explained - National Geographic

Is sea level rising? Yes, sea level is rising at an increasing rate. - NOAA

Climate Change Indicators: Sea Level - EPA

Sea Level Rise - US Climate Resilience Toolkit

How much is sea level rising? - SkepticalScience.com


I can put up links that say hillary is intelligent, not a criminal and should have been president. It doesn't make it true or desirable. I wonder if liberals can tax it and make it real? I doubt it.


Well, that just goes to show that if you can think of something, no matter how bizarre - there is a site for it on the internet.



However, I doubt that you could put up actual links to any sites that said, "Hillary is intelligent, not a criminal and should have been president". I tried such a search and only got sites critical of her.


Climates change, the earth is a self correcting system with internal feedback.The sun is the greatest contributor to climate change and second is gamma rays from the deep galaxy (they are part of the drivers that make clouds).

You presume that we are more powerful than we actually are, that's a bit egocentric of you lol. One moderate volcano blowing off for a week makes more greenhouse gas and pollution than man has created for the last 70 years. Btw, there are more than 80 active volcanoes and you fools think taxing all of us is going to fix things? All y'all need to be deprogrammed.

Cheers - Dave


You can't produce CO2 from elements other than Carbon and Oxygen. Hydrocarbon fuels are almost entirely Carbon, Oxygen and Hydrogen.

Molten magma, not so much Carbon or Oxygen.

Volcanic emissions of CO2 = somewhere between 65 mega tonnes/year to 319 mega tonnes/year.

Fossil fuel emissions of CO2 = 29,000 mega tonnes/year. About 92 times more than the highest estimate for volcanic activity.


Well, I found them all lol. Found many delusional authors of sites and media that said Hillary was intelligent, that Hillary wasn't a criminal and that Hillary should have been president. A simple 3 duckduckgo searches did that.

As far as your numbers, they are inaccurate and unproveable. There are many assumptions added in to "fossil fuel" usage and many assumption missed or left out in gaseous release of "greenhouse" gasses, including the actual numbers of volcanoes in the ocean. As well, the data has been left out on the degassing of non-active volcanoes.

Who knows what numbers are actually facts.

Cheers - Dave
edit on 6/3.2019 by bobs_uruncle because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 09:18 PM
link   
You know how the leftists say that the world will end? Want to know how they're lying?

They're still buying 30 year mortgages, and won't give away any of their money.

It's not like they can take it with them when they die when the world ends.

They're just feeding off the gullible. Milking them for every dime.

While leftists "activists" are reusing toilet paper and going without AC, they (the evil leftists) are laughing in their air-conditioned homes, counting the money that foolish naïve people are giving them.



posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 10:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: Dfairlite
A senior U.N. environmental official says entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed by the year 2000.

Of course this was the prediction in 1989, by the same body that is warning us today that we have only 10 years to act. What really happened during the warning period? We saw a small increase in temperatures and basically zero rising sea levels. Polar ice was melting a little but has regained most of that in the following 20 years. However, don't forget, 2000 was supposed to be the beginning of the end, not the end of the warming.

These people are stupid and they play on your being uninformed to try to get you to give up your freedom.


They were correct, however.
The world was destroyed by global warming in 2001, but we jumped to another dimension to save all souls on Planet Earth Version 32.
That's why we have the Mandela Effect and that's why we can't see Nibiru anymore.



posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 10:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: Lumenari
a reply to: chr0naut

You do realize that on page one of this thread I posted the SABER study results, which has proven that the higher levels of C02 in the atmosphere actually cools the planet, thus debunking the entire thing...

NASA results, no less.

But science BAD now?

heh



I sent that same report to a fellow scientist at work. It was an article from Climate depot with the report discussed in it. He saw that and didn't see the NOAA and the NASA work that was embedded in the story.
So i responded to his complaint of my source is NASA, it was in the story, he hasn't said a word.

edit on 3-6-2019 by Justoneman because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 10:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: RAY1990
a reply to: Justoneman

Ever heard of subduction?

The simple explanation is when tectonic plates push against each other the plate that is more dense is pushed downward into the earth/mantle and the other is push upwards. It's how mountain ridges are made.

I mean, it might be all nonsense but the mining industry seems to do alright. It's all about the relationship with the crust and the mantle and is a lot more complex than the simple explanation I gave.


This is a very dramatic change. I wonder jokingly, were you there for the subduction event? NO, you couldn't have been! It had to be an action Earth does without the influence of MAN. Man is not the reason the Earth changes dramatically. Sure we do make a scratch or two on the surface, but no more.



posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 10:55 PM
link   
I don't believe it's a hoax. Aren't you seeing all of the flooding on the news that's happening right now. Warming is the cause; a warmer environment means more evaporation, and more evaporation means more precipitation.



posted on Jun, 4 2019 @ 12:25 AM
link   
a reply to: Dfairlite


You are flat-out wrong, and amazingly uninformed. Considering the sheer ignorance of the other posts that i have seen from you, i cant say that i'm surprised.

"In 2014, global sea level was 2.6 inches above the 1993 average—the highest annual average in the satellite record. Sea level continues to rise at a rate of about one-eighth of an inch per year."

So despite your idiotic claim that sea levels havent risen during that time, they have actually risen nearly 3 inches.

Look at the chart on this page. See how the line starts curving up more drastically towards the right? Since you are very dense, allow me to explain to you what that it means: it means the sea levels are rising ever more rapidly in recent years.

skepticalscience.com...



posted on Jun, 4 2019 @ 12:45 AM
link   
Has anybody thought why even the best scientists like Albert Einstein never figured out how to STOP an atomic bomb from detonating ??

😆😆



posted on Jun, 4 2019 @ 12:49 AM
link   

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: Lumenari


Notice something?
source


Yea... I noticed that the warmest year in the last 100 years was in 1930 and it is nowhere on that chart.

Guess you didn't notice that?



" Climatologists have criticized the attention that the popular press gives to "warmest year" statistics; for example, Gavin Schmidt stated ' the long-term trends or the expected sequence of records are far more important than whether any single year is a record or not'[15] Of the 2015 and 2016 records, Schmidt stated that the 2014–16 El Niño event was "a factor ... but both 2015 and 2016 would have been records even without it.'"

One year anomalies are far less important than
large-scale trends. If an argument depends upon cherry-picking small select data points while ignoring a larger trend, then it is not a valid argument and you are being mislead.

Guess you werent smart enough to know that?
Cheers.
edit on 4-6-2019 by Maroboduus because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 4 2019 @ 12:58 AM
link   
It will never matter to officials and political talking heads if this stuff is real or not, because they will never fix anything, or even look for a solution when their sole purpose is to lie, misrepresent, and cheat, so they can steal your money to build their political fortresses, which will be used to shield them from you further. Protecting their own political monstrosity built with money from fraudulent intent.
LIARS all (Even if it is real it matters not to them).



posted on Jun, 4 2019 @ 01:02 AM
link   

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: Allaroundyou
a reply to: Dfairlite

NASA earth observatory most definitely does not agree with what you just claimed.


here




Which part of NASA... you mean the SABER study?


As reported by Principia Scientific International (PSI), Martin Mlynczak and his colleagues over at NASA tracked infrared emissions from the earth's upper atmosphere during and following a recent solar storm that took place between March 8-10. What they found was that the vast majority of energy released from the sun during this immense coronal mass ejection (CME) was reflected back up into space rather than deposited into earth's lower atmosphere.


I'm not sure if youre being shamelessly dishonest, or if youre just too dumb to realize that you are being blatantly misinformed by your source, which is itself has zero credibility. If you're going to attempt to post scientific evidence, how about getting it from an actual credible scientific source, rather than a blatantly partisan hack website?

Martin Mlynczak's study had literally nothing whatsoever to do with global warming. NOTHING. It was about the cooling of the THERMOSPHERE during a period of low solar activity/solar cooling. Mlynczak himself said that the cooling of the thermosphere found in his study has LITTLE TO NO EFFECT on surface temperatures of the earth.

You are a legitimate embarrassment.
edit on 4-6-2019 by Maroboduus because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 4 2019 @ 01:07 AM
link   

originally posted by: Lumenari
a reply to: chr0naut

You do realize that on page one of this thread I posted the SABER study results, which has proven that the higher levels of C02 in the atmosphere actually cools the planet, thus debunking the entire thing...

NASA results, no less.

But science BAD now?

heh


No. No, you posted a blatantly misleading article about a study you arent smart enough to understand that has nothing whatsoever to do with global warming, and deals only with the cooling of the thermosphere (which the lead scientist explicitly stated has no effect on surface earth temperatures or climate change). Which is very hilarious, and very embarrassing.
It's almost cute, just how ignorant and uninformed you are!

"To emphasize, the cooling effects we are seeing in Earth’s thermosphere are a result of the current solar minimum conditions. The thermosphere is the layer of Earth’s atmosphere beginning 65 miles above Earth’s surface and is highly sensitive to solar activity. There is no relationship between the natural cycle of cooling and warming in the thermosphere and the weather/climate at Earth’s surface. NASA and other climate researchers continue to see a warming trend in the troposphere, the layer of atmosphere closest to Earth’s surface. There is no inconsistency between the science findings of a warming troposphere [where we live] and the Thermosphere Climate Index described above in the Space Weather article .

Hilarious. You amuse me.
edit on 4-6-2019 by Maroboduus because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 4 2019 @ 05:36 AM
link   
a reply to: Maroboduus
Cycles, and not what the lying UN so called "scientists" who claim doom and DO NOT HAVE 97% consensus at all have claimed to have proven, NOT.

Here is a good discussion on what is happening to the Earth, it is the Pole shift. Phage hasn't been back around much after failing here.
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Here is another similar thread on ice activity near one of the Poles.

www.abovetopsecret.com...
And more to ponder
www.abovetopsecret.com...


edit on 4-6-2019 by Justoneman because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 4 2019 @ 05:55 AM
link   
Where are the geologists?

In college we were taught the earth went through extreme periods of hot and cold with no.human interaction.

The earth is so old it would be naive to.think humans could record its temperature in their mere existence....earth is measured is 100,000s of thousands of years, nothing humans could measure.

Yes humans can do damage and be extremely messy. But nothing to the political points the socialist progressive liberal democratic left have brought it to.

Volcano eruptions in the past and natural forest fires caused by lightning strikes they could never be put out by humans were the major co2 contributors of the past.

More then man made today



posted on Jun, 4 2019 @ 06:12 AM
link   
a reply to: IrateCanadian

it does matter that we are polluting the earth we do have an affect on the earth we are destroying natural habitats and life, it's just that Profit matters more !



posted on Jun, 4 2019 @ 06:25 AM
link   
Part of the reason it's so hard to take climate change as a threat seriously is the absurdity of statements like in the OP. They've given us so many deadlines that have amounted to nothing and continue to try and ramp up the scare tactics. I don't respond to absurdity and I expect many others don't either. I mean I guess they can scare some people into acting, but others can see their track record for successful predictions and realize they're about as accurate as those people that keep setting a date for the apocalypse. In fact they're basically the same people, only difference is one group uses the supernatural and a need to repent and the other supposedly uses science and the need to change our way of life. One group has it's donation accepting churches, and the other a desire to take everyone's money through carbon taxes as if stealing money and making more people poor fixes anything.

When they start coming up with real solutions other than theft, and stop the fear mongering I might listen.



posted on Jun, 4 2019 @ 06:43 AM
link   

originally posted by: sapien82
a reply to: IrateCanadian

it does matter that we are polluting the earth we do have an affect on the earth we are destroying natural habitats and life, it's just that Profit matters more !


It does matter for us as humans and our offspring.
But we must not lose site that all life is based on the natural products that are all over Earth. It is what it is when a species dominates the other animals. We honestly only scratch the surface Earth. Humans are a product of Earth and what we do is what was supposed to happen.

We are the only animal that can launch to the Moon and that is all Earth based ideas and materials therefore is natures way to produce a sentient being that will build and explore beyond this planet. Earth is special and we are only hurting humans in the end because wildlife adapts and the Earth's natural mechanisms cleanse the debris of the losers like humanity may become one day, off the face of the Earth.

Those that see us as a blight should prove it. They will if they go and off themselves, leaving a note please to explain and we will see who was really committed to the idea without killing others to make the point.

edit on 4-6-2019 by Justoneman because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
42
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join