It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Why You Should Never Believe The Global Warming Hoax And Alarmism

page: 1
42
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:
+32 more 
posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 05:20 PM
link   
A senior U.N. environmental official says entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed by the year 2000.

Of course this was the prediction in 1989, by the same body that is warning us today that we have only 10 years to act. What really happened during the warning period? We saw a small increase in temperatures and basically zero rising sea levels. Polar ice was melting a little but has regained most of that in the following 20 years. However, don't forget, 2000 was supposed to be the beginning of the end, not the end of the warming.

These people are stupid and they play on your being uninformed to try to get you to give up your freedom.

edit on Thu Jun 6 2019 by DontTreadOnMe because: spelling in title



+11 more 
posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 05:24 PM
link   
a reply to: Dfairlite

Heartily agree. I mean, they have already stated that it isn't about the environment anymore... it's about a global wealth redistribution plan.

Oh!

And because of the topic, I'll just drop this link here at the beginning of the thread for those who are coming...

97 Articles Refuting The “97% Consensus”




posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 05:30 PM
link   
a reply to: Dfairlite

NASA earth observatory most definitely does not agree with what you just claimed.


here


+15 more 
posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 05:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: Allaroundyou
a reply to: Dfairlite

NASA earth observatory most definitely does not agree with what you just claimed.
here


All I read there was "Hey, someday soon we are gonna have to rape taxpayers further, so let's keep this scam alive."

I saw some pretty pictures, no evidence and a couple of alarmist statements without any standing.

Cheers - Dave
edit on 6/3.2019 by bobs_uruncle because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 05:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: Dfairlite
A senior U.N. environmental official says entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed by the year 2000.

Of course this was the prediction in 1989, by the same body that is warning us today that we have only 10 years to act. What really happened during the warning period? We saw a small increase in temperatures and basically zero rising sea levels. Polar ice was melting a little but has regained most of that in the following 20 years. However, don't forget, 2000 was supposed to be the beginning of the end, not the end of the warming.

These people are stupid and they play on your being uninformed to try to get you to give up your freedom.


We were supposed to be drowned by 2005. Oddly enough, the more they try to clear the atmosphere, the hotter it's going to get. Polluting the atmosphere is the only way to cool the Earth back down manually. But I'm no scientist, I have common sense.



posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 05:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: Allaroundyou
a reply to: Dfairlite

NASA earth observatory most definitely does not agree with what you just claimed.


here



I'm glad the Space Administration doesn't agree. They need to keep focused on space like they're designed to do.


+6 more 
posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 05:45 PM
link   
a reply to: Allaroundyou

NASA lies about a lot. They get 90% of their funding off of lies and deceit.

I never trust anything NASA says. They're a group of crooked "scientists" that push the global bullsh*t agenda for elites.

We're dealing with a grand solar minimum if you look back at that history. Happens naturally and they are using it this time as an income scam with the help of MSM and the sh*tty left gov't.

If the world is going to be destroyed or "ruined beyond reasonable measure" in a short period of time from all of our so called "pollution". Then why are super powers like China allowed to still throw massive amounts of the most harmful chemicals in the atmosphere? Why has nothing been done about all the radiation that leaked into the ocean and made its way over to the pacific coast of USA?

Because it actually doesn't matter.

What does matter, is everyone needs to keep buying and buying and buying all of the materials and new crap that comes out every hour/day/month/year because that is what they want.

Otherwise they would cease and stop ALL polluting, no matter what it is.

But naw, lets increase gas prices by applying a tax to it. Guess what? Doesn't make a difference in gas usage. Everyone will use the same amount. They just reap the benefits of some BS tax applied.

Just like everything else. It's a complete tax grab off of some "scare tactic" that people are too dumb to figure out for themselves and they just listen to whatever their lying a** gov't tells them to do.
edit on 3-6-2019 by IrateCanadian because: (no reason given)


+15 more 
posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 05:45 PM
link   
“If you’re not a liberal when you’re 25, you have no heart. If you’re not a conservative by the time you’re 35, you have no brain.“

The operative word is heart .

Man-made global warming is a tool used by academics to help enlist and control young liberals . It affects young conservatives to a lesser degree .

They use earth’s normal climate change to blame mankind exclusively and create a unfalsifiable position.

They create guilt in the bleeding liberal hearts which gives them a cause and keeps them in line .

AOC Is a good example she went to college to earn a business degree ( which obviously didn’t take ) and came out with a PhD in global warming .

When the racist card has been played to its end.

The man-made global warming card will pick up the slack .

Edit;

Without global warming to manipulate the young. I seriously doubt the left would be anywhere near as unified as it is now .



edit on 3-6-2019 by Fallingdown because: (no reason given)

edit on 3-6-2019 by Fallingdown because: (no reason given)


+7 more 
posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 05:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: Allaroundyou
a reply to: Dfairlite

NASA earth observatory most definitely does not agree with what you just claimed.


here



Which part of NASA... you mean the SABER study?


As reported by Principia Scientific International (PSI), Martin Mlynczak and his colleagues over at NASA tracked infrared emissions from the earth's upper atmosphere during and following a recent solar storm that took place between March 8-10. What they found was that the vast majority of energy released from the sun during this immense coronal mass ejection (CME) was reflected back up into space rather than deposited into earth's lower atmosphere.

The result was an overall cooling effect that completely contradicts claims made by NASA's own climatology division that greenhouse gases are a cause of global warming. As illustrated by data collected using Sounding of the Atmosphere using Broadband Emission Radiometry (SABER), both carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitric oxide (NO), which are abundant in the earth's upper atmosphere, greenhouse gases reflect heating energy rather than absorb it.

"Carbon dioxide and nitric oxide are natural thermostats," says James Russell from Hampton University, who was one of the lead investigators for the groundbreaking SABER study. "When the upper atmosphere (or 'thermosphere') heats up, these molecules try as hard as they can to shed that heat back into space."


Or Dr Hansen of NASA?


"The shock revelation starkly contradicts the core proposition of the so-called greenhouse gas theory which claims that more CO2 means more warming for our planet,"writes H. Schreuder and J. O'Sullivan for PSI. "This compelling new NASA data disproves that notion and is a huge embarrassment for NASA's chief climatologist, Dr. James Hansen and his team over at NASA's GISS."

Dr. Hansen, of course, is an outspoken global warming activist who helped spark man-made climate change hysteria in the U.S. back in 1988. Just after the release of the new SABER study, however, Dr. Hansen conveniently retired from his career as a climatologist at NASA, and reportedly now plans to spend his time "on science," and on "drawing attention to [its] implications for young people."


Principia-Scientific International

Or do you mean when NASA was caught just fudging the numbers?

Which way do you want to go with this...

LOL


edit on 3-6-2019 by Lumenari because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 05:50 PM
link   
a reply to: LSU2018

the Earth Observatory should focus on space? You can't be that clueless? They do very important work that would otherwise be impossible.
link



posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 05:54 PM
link   
a reply to: Allaroundyou

All it took to convince you was a pretty map alleging temperature changes and you accept wholesale that the world is over? 20 years ago cities were supposed to be under water. Yet here you are trusting what these governing bodies are telling you.



posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 05:55 PM
link   
a reply to: Lumenari


Notice something?
source



posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 05:59 PM
link   
a reply to: Peeple

Earth is cooling. Must be all them damn chemtrails i've been hearing about that block out the sun.

Oh wait. The Dinguses at Harvard decided to come out and say they are doing that.. When in fact that has been going on for decades.

Im curious to see what 2019 will look like on that graph



posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 05:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: bobs_uruncle

originally posted by: Allaroundyou
a reply to: Dfairlite

NASA earth observatory most definitely does not agree with what you just claimed.
here


All I read there was "Hey, someday soon we are gonna have to rape taxpayers further, so let's keep this scam alive."

I saw some pretty pictures, no evidence and a couple of alarmist statements without any standing.

Cheers - Dave


A LOT of tax dollars....


The plaintive calls about global warming and loss of polar bear habitats, the stern warnings about rising seas and flooded coastlines - this is what the public hears about. Then there’s this pesky, inconvenient truth they don’t hear about: $1.5 trillion.

“Interest in climate change is becoming an increasingly powerful economic driver, so much so that some see it as an industry in itself whose growth is driven in large part by policymaking, notes Don Jergler, an analyst for Insurance Journal, an industry publication

“The $1.5 trillion global ‘climate change industry’ grew at between 17 and 24 percent annually from 2005-2008, slowing to between 4 and 6 percent following the recession with the exception of 2011’s inexplicable 15 percent growth, according to Climate Change Business Journal,” he writes.

WT Article

Scaring the crap out of stupid people is BIG business!!!



+10 more 
posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 06:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: Lumenari


Notice something?
source


Yea... I noticed that the warmest year in the last 100 years was in 1930 and it is nowhere on that chart.

Guess you didn't notice that?




posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 06:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: Lumenari


Notice something?
source


Last 3 years the temp has gone down? Ok 2.

and

Wiki is an actual source for scientific data (Even though it has an edit button next to each section)?
edit on 3-6-2019 by ATruGod because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 06:03 PM
link   
a reply to: Lumenari

Source?



posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 06:03 PM
link   
a reply to: Lumenari

This is probably after some "adjustment"



posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 06:03 PM
link   
a reply to: Lumenari

"The ChUrCh oF CLiMaToLogY jUsT wANts ThEiR cUT TOo"

What a time to be alive. Air tax the world over nonsense. It's almost like they WANT to piss off people on purpose.

I wish I had a complete sh*t conscience to screw over the world in the name of greed and power.




posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 06:04 PM
link   
a reply to: ATruGod

Did you ever actually participate on Wiki or in the debate that go on behind the scenes?



new topics

top topics



 
42
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join