It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The stable genius, Triggered

page: 10
24
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 31 2019 @ 03:48 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

Show me the action you sited.
otherwise you are full of it

there was NO action

there was no lie
only spin




posted on May, 31 2019 @ 04:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: chr0naut

Mueller is under blackmail from the Whitey Bulger Family 😎

Pretty obvious too 😎


Trump was a game show host and casino boss. Pretty obvious too.

Please, inform us of how you know and what dirt the Bulger's have on him.


I have some knowledge, but I'd rather live a few more years 😎


Ha ha, so Trump can't protect you from the jailed bad guys.

How powerful and effectual he is as a head of state.




posted on May, 31 2019 @ 04:13 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

I think Bueller got snubbed and confused because Barr didn't release Bueller's 10 page "summary".

Bueller wasn't expecting a 448 page release either (even with required redactions).

Democrats in Congress were counting on the 448 page report to be their own little narrative to twist and wiggle to their liking only and manipulate the bananaMSM to their liking 😎

The Triggering was off kilter from the start 😆



posted on May, 31 2019 @ 04:14 PM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

The people I'm talking about aren't in jail 😎



posted on May, 31 2019 @ 04:14 PM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody




Show me the action you sited.


No. I've shown you enough. You're being willfully ignorant and obtuse.

Barr lied, on at least 3 separate occasions to Congress. He also tried to avoid the law that requires him to report changes to conclusions in the Mueller report to Congress.

The evidence is clear.



posted on May, 31 2019 @ 04:19 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

yeah that is exactly what I expected
mueller took NO ACTION
Barr was required to do nothing other than give congress a summary

you are full of crap and your assessment is nothing but poorly constructed spin



posted on May, 31 2019 @ 04:21 PM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

That's your opinion. Not the opinion of most political scientists, journalists, politicians or legal professional.



posted on May, 31 2019 @ 04:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: shooterbrody

That's your opinion. Not the opinion of most political scientists, journalists, politicians or legal professional.

you made the claim and posted the quote from the special council procedure
now produce the action
or just admit you were mistaken
easy enough



posted on May, 31 2019 @ 04:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: Fallingdown
a reply to: chr0naut

Muller could have made a referral to the US attorney .

Kenneth Starr did it 11 times on Slick Willy .

I’m telling you a fact.

Unless you can show me a rule change my statement is 100% accurate .

Janet Reno under the Clinton administration re-wrote the independent counsel guidelines to the special counsel guidelines. Look in there, see if you can find a rule change I couldn’t .

Edit;

I never said Mueller could indict the president .

I said he could’ve made a decision which is a referral. Ken Starr making 11 referrals against Clinton proves you can make criminal referrals against a president .





So who is the current US Attorney General? William Barr.

And who did Mueller give the entire and unredacted report to? William Barr.

So isn't that a referral to the AG?

But despite that, who does the AG work for? The DOJ, under President.

And what is the rule about the DOJ not being able to indict a sitting President?

So can the AG do anything with the referral?

Or is the impeachment process one that is handled through Congress, as it was with Starr's report on Bill Clinton?

edit on 31/5/2019 by chr0naut because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 31 2019 @ 04:49 PM
link   
Just like some others here not knowing the report was not to be public? where did they get the info it was suposed to be public?

why do the left like to either make up laws, mis-apply the law, or ignore it completely, OVER and OVER.

then act suprised when caught, "there was no intent to (get caught) Break(ing) the law"

Mueller was a weasel in giving a none response reponse, in a report that is (not) a guide for impeachment, becuase it was NOT ALLOWED to be public, by a law the democrats put in place.

Why is this so hard to understand?

If, as the Democrats and others say, this is a guide for congress, that was not to be revealed how can it be a guide?

ETA: and the 4 page "Summary" is a BS lie. it wqas a 4 page CONCLUSION of facts. Goole what conclusion means folks, it was not a "summary" of ANYTHING!

deny ignorance remember

that is, if there was no bias, please do explain.
edit on 31-5-2019 by thedigirati because: I can



posted on May, 31 2019 @ 04:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: chr0naut

The people I'm talking about aren't in jail 😎


Well, give your testimony and get them there.

Otherwise, you are an accessory.



posted on May, 31 2019 @ 04:53 PM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

Referrals have to be specific and in writing.

The Bueller Report is only a Report.

🙃



posted on May, 31 2019 @ 04:55 PM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

I made my claim, posted the evidence and Mueller's and Barr's words. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make them cognoscente.



posted on May, 31 2019 @ 04:55 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

with no determinations
how limp
not the super tough bobby 2 stick that was paraded and advertised here
isnt that just silly



posted on May, 31 2019 @ 04:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: shooterbrody

I made my claim, posted the evidence and Mueller's and Barr's words. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make them cognoscente.

and you are simply wrong
sorry
perhaps turn off the msnbc or cnn

or produce the action you claimed



posted on May, 31 2019 @ 05:00 PM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody




and you are simply wrong


That's your opinion. You're not the arbiter of truth here.

The evidence is clear. Barr lied, at least 3 times, to Congress, and he tried to avoid alerting Congress to his override of Mueller's conclusions.



posted on May, 31 2019 @ 05:08 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

so you got that action you claimed?
.....
.....
you wouldn't have made that up would you?
.....
.....
its pretty easy
you made the claim
simply follow through with the action you sited....



posted on May, 31 2019 @ 05:11 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

How could Barr lie about something you were never going to see.

start there then move forward, otherwise, nothing you say matters.

Explain why the report was made public first.



posted on May, 31 2019 @ 05:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: chr0naut

Referrals have to be specific and in writing.

The Bueller Report is only a Report.

🙃


Mueller Report Appendix D pages D-3 to D-6. Mostly redacted but clearly 14 specific referrals in writing, under the heading of "Referrals", just so you know.




posted on May, 31 2019 @ 05:30 PM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

What happened to your other position ?



new topics

top topics



 
24
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join