Mueller To Make Statement Today

a reply to: Sillyolme

are you finally tired of the empty stick?
finally see that bobby 2 sticks is the empty stick?

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: shooterbrody

everything he did was to stop the investigation. That is obstruction of justice.
This is so much fun reading you guys spin round and round when he is caught like a rat in a trap.

really
is that what the ag said?
as that is all that matters......

a reply to: shooterbrody

congress doesnt get to second guess the ag

Yes they do. The AG didn't say that Trump didn't "endeavor" to obstruct justice. The AG said that Trump's action weren't "corrupt", and so they didn't rise to criminal. According to the Mueller report, Congress alone can determine what is and what is not presidential corruption. Mueller and Barr disagree on that, publicly and openly.

a reply to: Sookiechacha

The AG said that Trump's action weren't "corrupt", and so they didn't rise to criminal.

yep
barr and roseinstein
both at one time or another muellers bosses

congress can impeach
good luck finding a criminal referal to do such
as the ag has made the determination there was none

what is holding up fat jerry?

a reply to: CynConcepts

trump telling witnesses to lie and destroying documentation is however.

You are correct even if Mueller was fired it would not have stopped the investigation.
That still doesn't mean trump didn't attempt to do just that.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: CynConcepts

trump telling witnesses to lie and destroying documentation is however.

He should have destroyed it with a hammer. Apparently that's all above board.

Or wiped it with a cloth or something.

a reply to: shooterbrody

You may think so but its really what congress says that matters. Not what the ag said.

He wont have a friggin thing to say about any of it if they go forward with impeachment hearings.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: CynConcepts

trump telling witnesses to lie and destroying documentation is however.

Or maybe Trump should have been interviewed alongside those witnesses, with those very witnesses acting as his legal counsel?

He really had so many options to choose from...

a reply to: Sillyolme

if they go forward with impeachment hearings.

what is the hold up?
Mr Green has been pushing for this for a long time.
Seems he is a dem with an actual spine, and not just searching for sandwiches.

you are behind
the new talking point is censure
lol

you being wrong again is funny

a reply to: shooterbrody

The bar for high crimes and misdemeanors is set by congress. Not the AG.
What may not be a crime in the general sector can be one for impeachment proceedings.
So again Barrs opinion wont matter one bit.

a reply to: Rewey

how snappy....

got anything to offer for todays porceedings or are you just here to rehash your old wounds?

a reply to: Rewey

He had a choice to sit down and answer questions. His legal team didn't think he was up to handling it.
Wow...

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: shooterbrody

The bar for high crimes and misdemeanors is set by congress. Not the AG.
What may not be a crime in the general sector can be one for impeachment proceedings.
So again Barrs opinion wont matter one bit.

so then what is the holdup for the impeachment?
green has been waiting for over 2 years.
fat jerry waiting on a pizza delivery first?

oh and I would wager the crimes means actual crimes....but as it is a political process who knows what aoc will make up

good thing it goes to the senate after the house......i would wager they will need an actual real crime not a possibly or could have or potential....i would wager they would look seriously upon the ag's determination as well

but thats just my opinion

a reply to: Sillyolme

hearsay and second hand testimonies 😎

all without proof of anything 😎

like a hot dog with an empty bun 😎

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
Numerous Congressional members and legal teams disagree with your assessment of the constitutional authority and duties of Congress and how they assert them.

Cite them.

If Congress gets wind of a potential crime during one of their legislative oversight investigations, they are supposed to refer it to the DOJ for investigation and, if necessary, prosecution.