It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Spygate Derangement Syndrome - Democrats and Liberal Media Are Totally Whacked.

page: 2
46
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 28 2019 @ 12:20 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust



Sorry I have to post this again just to highlight the absurdity of the whole thing.




posted on May, 28 2019 @ 12:26 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

That is correct..I am pretty anti MSM on the whole, it's all agenda driven. However the liberal media has taken it to a level that is simply destructive. Deep State Pawns...but, that's what they want. Still pushing that dead 2020 plan. USA+Russia = the deep state lost.



posted on May, 28 2019 @ 12:27 AM
link   
a reply to: AgarthaSeed

Why won't that Pedo shut up already..

ETA: I see that's from 2016..even better. He should still pipe it.

I want to see him and Adam Gase (NY jets coach) in a staring contest!
edit on 28-5-2019 by Sabrechucker because: edit



posted on May, 28 2019 @ 12:33 AM
link   
a reply to: mtnshredder
When hate and fear take precedent over "intelligence", that person is dangerous. That's why they have to be served justice ASAP.

Maybe more of them need to see their life flash before their eyes, like Jerry Nadler did last week. He's been dead quiet since then.



posted on May, 28 2019 @ 12:39 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Care for the win




posted on May, 28 2019 @ 12:40 AM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: shooterbrody

Yep! Sally Yates is one of the top officials who lied to FISA court justices.

Source: www.washingtonexaminer.com...

That and unmasked many us citizens illegally.
Rogers exposed these dummys early on.



posted on May, 28 2019 @ 12:44 AM
link   
The tobacco is loading into the pipes...........

Remember this one........

Grassley, Graham Uncover ‘Unusual Email’ Sent by Susan Rice to Herself on President Trump’s Inauguration Day


#declass **bi zi bōōk** 🤣


edit on May-28-2019 by xuenchen because: 🍌 banana.gov 🍌



posted on May, 28 2019 @ 12:52 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Damn, Grassley and Graham are on it!

I like these two:

4. Did anyone instruct, request, suggest, or imply that you should send yourself the aforementioned Inauguration Day email memorializing President Obama’s meeting with Mr. Comey about the Trump/Russia investigation? If so, who and why?

12. Did President Obama have any other meetings with Mr. Comey, Ms. Yates, or other government officials about the FBI’s investigation of allegations of collusion between Trump associates and Russia? If so, when did these occur, who participated, and what was discussed?

Seems like.....




posted on May, 28 2019 @ 12:57 AM
link   
a reply to: Sabrechucker

Public Laundromats and corporate cleaning services are getting memos of recommendation to switch over to Arm&Hammer Detergent (powder preferred) ......




posted on May, 28 2019 @ 01:01 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

C mon now. no one #'s the bed that bad...except Nads ler



posted on May, 28 2019 @ 01:09 AM
link   
a reply to: AgarthaSeed

Devin Nunes and Bob Corker warned President Obama about Russia in 2014. Obama ignored them.

Nunes: nunes.house.gov...
Corker: www.congress.gov...



posted on May, 28 2019 @ 01:09 AM
link   
I feel a "Trim those quotes" coming but, this should be known..maybe even it's own 'detailed' chronological thread.

www.grassley.senate.gov...

The Honorable Susan Rice
Senior Fellow, Belfer Center
Harvard University
79 John F. Kennedy Street
Cambridge, MA 02138

c/o
Kathryn Ruemmler, Esq.
Latham and Watkins LLP
555 Eleventh Street NW
Washington, DC 20004

Dear Ambassador Rice:

The Senate Judiciary Committee has a constitutional duty to conduct oversight of the FBI and the broader Department of Justice. Part of that duty involves ensuring that law enforcement efforts are conducted without improper political influence. Accordingly, the Committee has been investigating the FBI’s relationship with Christopher Steele during the time his work was funded by Hillary for America and the Democratic National Committee, as well as the FBI’s reliance on his unverified third-hand allegations in the Bureau’s representations to courts.

As part of that effort, the Committee sent a request to the National Archives for records of meetings between President Obama and then-FBI Director Comey regarding the FBI’s investigation of allegations of collusion between associates of Mr. Trump and the Russian government. In response, the Committee received classified and unclassified versions of an email you sent to yourself on January 20, 2017 – President Trump’s inauguration day. If the timestamp is correct, you sent this email to yourself at 12:15pm, presumably a very short time before you departed the White House for the last time.

In this email to yourself, you purport to document a meeting that had taken place more than two weeks before, on January 5, 2017. You wrote:

On January 5, following a briefing by IC leadership on Russian hacking during the 2016 Presidential election, President Obama had a brief follow-on conversation with FBI Director Jim Comey and Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates in the Oval Office. Vice President Biden and I were also present.
That meeting reportedly included a discussion of the Steele dossier and the FBI’s investigation of its claims.[1] Your email continued:

President Obama began the conversation by stressing his continued commitment to ensuring that every aspect of this issue is handled by the Intelligence and law enforcement communities “by the book”. The President stressed that he is not asking about, initiating or instructing anything from a law enforcement perspective. He reiterated that our law enforcement team needs to proceed as it normally would by the book.

From a national security perspective, however, President Obama said he wants to be sure that, as we engage with the incoming team, we are mindful to ascertain if there is any reason that we cannot share information fully as it relates to Russia.

The next part of your email remains classified. After that, you wrote:

The President asked Comey to inform him if anything changes in the next few weeks that should affect how we share classified information with the incoming team. Comey said he would.

It strikes us as odd that, among your activities in the final moments on the final day of the Obama administration, you would feel the need to send yourself such an unusual email purporting to document a conversation involving President Obama and his interactions with the FBI regarding the Trump/Russia investigation. In addition, despite your claim that President Obama repeatedly told Mr. Comey to proceed “by the book,” substantial questions have arisen about whether officials at the FBI, as well as at the Justice Department and the State Department, actually did proceed “by the book.”

In order for the Committee to further assess the situation, please respond to the following by February 22, 2018:

Did you send the email attached to this letter to yourself? Do you have any reason to dispute the timestamp of the email?

When did you first become aware of the FBI’s investigation into allegations of collusion between Mr. Trump’s associates and Russia?

When did you become aware of any surveillance activities, including FISA applications, undertaken by the FBI in conducting that investigation? At the time you wrote this email to yourself, were you aware of either the October 2016 FISA application for surveillance of Carter Page or the January 2017 renewal?

Did anyone instruct, request, suggest, or imply that you should send yourself the aforementioned Inauguration Day email memorializing President Obama’s meeting with Mr. Comey about the Trump/Russia investigation? If so, who and why?

Is the account of the January 5, 2017 meeting presented in your email accurate? Did you omit any other portions of the conversation?

Other than that email, did you document the January 5, 2017 meeting in any way, such as contemporaneous notes or a formal memo? To the best of your knowledge, did anyone else at that meeting take notes or otherwise memorialize the meeting?

During the meeting, did Mr. Comey or Ms. Yates mention potential press coverage of the Steele dossier? If so, what did they say?

During the meeting, did Mr. Comey describe the status of the FBI’s relationship with Mr. Steele, or the basis for that status?

When and how did you first become aware of the allegations made by Christopher Steele?

When and how did you first become aware that the Clinton Campaign and the Democratic National Committee funded Mr. Steele’s efforts?

You wrote that President Obama stressed that he was “not asking about, initiating or instructing anything from a law enforcement perspective.” Did President Obama ask about, initiate, or instruct anything from any other perspective relating to the FBI’s investigation?

Did President Obama have any other meetings with Mr. Comey, Ms. Yates, or other government officials about the FBI’s investigation of allegations of collusion between Trump associates and Russia? If so, when did these occur, who participated, and what was discussed?

Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Please contact Patrick Davis of Chairman Grassley’s staff at (202) 224-5225 or Lee Holmes of Chairman Graham’s staff at (202) 224-5972 if you have any questions.

Sincerely,


Charles E. Grassley Lindsey O. Graham
Chairman Chairman
Committee on the Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime and Terrorism
Committee on the Judiciary

Enclosure: as stated.

cc: The Honorable Dianne Feinstein
Ranking Member
Committee on the Judiciary

The Honorable Sheldon Whitehouse
Ranking Member
Subcommittee on Crime and Terrorism
Committee on the Judiciary

www.grassley.senate.gov...
edit on 28-5-2019 by Sabrechucker because: edit



posted on May, 28 2019 @ 01:12 AM
link   
a reply to: Sabrechucker

Thank-goodness for social media. If the citizens of this planet had to rely on their country's Mainstream Media for information, Hillary would be President, and Europe would be back in the dark ages.



posted on May, 28 2019 @ 01:19 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

I don't like Social Media or the MSM, although I understand what you mean. What a horrible day it would be if we all had to meet in person and...Dare I say..Talk in person. The millennial's would run out of pampers faster than a Miami day care!



posted on May, 28 2019 @ 01:19 AM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: shooterbrody

Yep! Sally Yates is one of the top officials who lied to FISA court justices.

Source: www.washingtonexaminer.com...

That and unmasked many us citizens illegally.
Rogers exposed these dummys early on.


I saw that Obama's U.N. Ambassador, Samantha Power, Un-masked 250 individuals, in a 2016 unmasking binge.

Unmasking by U.S. intelligence agencies typically occurs after the United States conducts eavesdropping or other intelligence gathering aimed at foreigners or foreign agents, and the name of a U.S. citizen or entity is incidentally collected.

Intelligence reports are then disseminated within the U.S. government, with such names masked to protect those U.S. citizens from invasion of privacy. The names can subsequently be unmasked upon request by authorized U.S. government officials under certain circumstances.[1]
en.wikipedia.org...

WHY would America's UN Ambassador do this?

edit on 5/28/2019 by carewemust because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 28 2019 @ 01:25 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

That Susan Rice "by the book" e-mail reminded me of Star Trek Wrath of Kahn scene. Spock tricked Kahn using the "by the book" phraseology.

Sadly, I still don't understand what he meant...or Susan Rice for that matter.
edit on 5/28/2019 by carewemust because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 28 2019 @ 01:32 AM
link   
a reply to: Sabrechucker

I think Mueller was the only investigator who was NOT ignored by witnesses. They responded to all of his questions.

Congressional questions and requests seemed to be totally ignored when Republicans ran the House, just like they are now that Democrats run the House.

Hopefully Barr's prosecutors are having the same success with witnesses that Mueller had.



posted on May, 28 2019 @ 01:38 AM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: mtnshredder
When hate and fear take precedent over "intelligence", that person is dangerous. That's why they have to be served justice ASAP.

Maybe more of them need to see their life flash before their eyes, like Jerry Nadler did last week. He's been dead quiet since then.

You have to be dead inside to do the things they do anyways don't ya?



posted on May, 28 2019 @ 02:54 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

"Spygate Derangement Syndrome"?!?

Oh yeah, well you people and your Pedophile Derangement Syndrome will be triggered to high hell once Biden landslides teh POTUS seat in 2020.




posted on May, 28 2019 @ 07:38 AM
link   
This thread is like an echo-chamber between four or five guys.



new topics

top topics



 
46
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join