Gillibrand's "Family Bill of Rights"...

originally posted by: DBCowboy

This is a way the pro-abortion crowd tries to silence the anti-abortion crowd.

And it defies logic.

I'm against stabbing monkeys as well.

Should I be forced to spend money on monkey cages?

Why not, you are attempting TO FORCE A WOMAN to give birth. Why does it make sense to you that the child only matters to you until it is born?

Do you even consider the circumstances it may be born into, just so you can feel good by saying I saved that child's life while crying about taxes and poor/unwanted children.

a reply to: G0DK1LL3R

Do you know how babies are made?

Maybe if the mommy and daddy took the time to be responsible, then they wouldn't have to kill their offspring.

If you are against killing hookers, I want to know how many hookers you have at your house right now!

SPEAK!

originally posted by: DBCowboy

You guys don't care what happens to the UNWANTED child once it is born. Don't care about the circumstances as to why abortion became a choice for the woman, do not care how that child will, if it is in a loving home, if it is fed, if it has access to healthcare...etc

Bullspit. Coming from someone who's solution is to "kill them", your attempt at moral high ground fails.

Your war cry is "this unborn baby deserves life but we don't care what kind of life just that it is born" and once it is unborn "not my problem"

And you want to kill them to "save" them.

Like I said before, I am against abortion but am for a women's right to choose, no matter how much I disagree with her choice.

You guys on the other hand are making claims it is for this child but you never stop to think about the circumstances to why abortion was choice or what circumstances it may be born into.

You ,supposedly, want to "save" these children without thinking about what comes after.

Your moral high ground is "stop the child from being aborted" and "my tax dollars are not to be used to help poor/unwanted children"

Your morality depends on, if you have to spend money on the "poor unborn child". If someone came up to you and said your tax dollars will go to a program that would stop abortions, you would be absolutely not, that unborn child is not my problem.

Calm down. LMAO
Was not able to post entire comment for some reason so I took a pic of what I wrote.

a reply to: G0DK1LL3R

So you think being against killing unborn humans is bad.

Against, that is a very stupid post.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: G0DK1LL3R

So you think being against killing unborn humans is bad.

Against, that is a very stupid post.

Yeah cuz that is what I said. *eye roll*

If you actually cared about child than, I would be on your side but you don't and only want control of woman's body.

originally posted by: G0DK1LL3R

originally posted by: DBCowboy

This is a way the pro-abortion crowd tries to silence the anti-abortion crowd.

And it defies logic.

I'm against stabbing monkeys as well.

Should I be forced to spend money on monkey cages?

Why not, you are attempting TO FORCE A WOMAN to give birth. Why does it make sense to you that the child only matters to you until it is born?

Do you even consider the circumstances it may be born into, just so you can feel good by saying I saved that child's life while crying about taxes and poor/unwanted children.

May I ask who is included in all these "you people" that you keep referring to in your ranting posts? Am I included in that list? This is a serious question, and I expect a serious answer.

originally posted by: G0DK1LL3R

originally posted by: DBCowboy

You guys don't care what happens to the UNWANTED child once it is born. Don't care about the circumstances as to why abortion became a choice for the woman, do not care how that child will, if it is in a loving home, if it is fed, if it has access to healthcare...etc

Bullspit. Coming from someone who's solution is to "kill them", your attempt at moral high ground fails.

Your war cry is "this unborn baby deserves life but we don't care what kind of life just that it is born" and once it is unborn "not my problem"

And you want to kill them to "save" them.

Like I said before, I am against abortion but am for a women's right to choose, no matter how much I disagree with her choice.

So you're against child porn (I hope), but if others wanted to do child porn, you'd be cool with it because it's "their" choice.

Will reply once done work.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: G0DK1LL3R

originally posted by: DBCowboy

You guys don't care what happens to the UNWANTED child once it is born. Don't care about the circumstances as to why abortion became a choice for the woman, do not care how that child will, if it is in a loving home, if it is fed, if it has access to healthcare...etc

Bullspit. Coming from someone who's solution is to "kill them", your attempt at moral high ground fails.

Your war cry is "this unborn baby deserves life but we don't care what kind of life just that it is born" and once it is unborn "not my problem"

And you want to kill them to "save" them.

Like I said before, I am against abortion but am for a women's right to choose, no matter how much I disagree with her choice.

So you're against child porn (I hope), but if others wanted to do child porn, you'd be cool with it because it's "their" choice.

Well you know that someone creating child porn is either a parent or knows a parent who isn't obviously taking care of said child.

That would be one of the circumstances you do not care about when a child is born. Remember in the womb, poor child, out of womb not your problem.

a reply to: G0DK1LL3R

So you're not going to answer the question.

And you still think you hold an ethical, moral high ground.

Like I previously stated, you have made a huge series of very stupid posts.

I'm not calling you stupid, but you are very adept at making highly illogical, stupid posts.

I blame tide pods.

a reply to: DBCowboy

Gronk: "Tide pods"

a reply to: BlueJacket



I'll do one better.

I challenge anyone to a one-on-one debate IN THE DEBATE FORUM on the topic of "Anti-abortionists being fiscally responsible for children that are born".

Anyone?

Any takers?

Yea I gotta say adults know how babies are made and yet engage in the act without contraception anyway. Its that very point you chose the be responsible for what might happen. You had a choice to begin with. It does however make sense that if they were lazy and uncaring about the use of contraception that those types would also be lazy and uncaring about killing their child out of convenience right? At no point is anyone else responsible for your children even if you were too poor to have them in the first place.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: G0DK1LL3R

So you're not going to answer the question.

And you still think you hold an ethical, moral high ground.

Like I previously stated, you have made a huge series of very stupid posts.

I'm not calling you stupid, but you are very adept at making highly illogical, stupid posts.

I blame tide pods.

The answer is against child porn but you don't get to pretend you care about those children and the reason they are being abused.

You have stated that once the child is born, it is not you problem. Child porn is just one the many outcomes that could happen if forcing a woman to give birth. If she wanted an abortion but then was forced to have it, we have no way of knowing what she then does with this child she did not want.

So many things happen to children who are unwanted.

So remember your cause.

IN WOMB - you care so much about the sanctity of life you are willing to force a woman to give birth

OUT OF WOMB - not your problem and your "sanctity of life" disappears and is replaced with my tax dollars and not my problem

originally posted by: Krakatoa

originally posted by: G0DK1LL3R

originally posted by: DBCowboy

This is a way the pro-abortion crowd tries to silence the anti-abortion crowd.

And it defies logic.

I'm against stabbing monkeys as well.

Should I be forced to spend money on monkey cages?

Why not, you are attempting TO FORCE A WOMAN to give birth. Why does it make sense to you that the child only matters to you until it is born?

Do you even consider the circumstances it may be born into, just so you can feel good by saying I saved that child's life while crying about taxes and poor/unwanted children.

May I ask who is included in all these "you people" that you keep referring to in your ranting posts? Am I included in that list? This is a serious question, and I expect a serious answer.

Still awaiting the answer to my serious question above. If you are now responding to others, then I expect an answer as well.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

I'll do one better.
I challenge anyone to a one-on-one debate IN THE DEBATE FORUM on the topic of "Anti-abortionists being fiscally responsible for children that are born".

Anyone?

Any takers?

So genius, you just forced a woman to give birth. Now what?

A couple of scenarios to consider.

Mother does not want child gives it up for state care.

Mother is addicted to drugs/alcohol but wants to take baby, promising she will take care of child but due to her addiction she surrounds herself with shady characters...possible pedophiles

Mother had baby and father leaves, with no support and mother was already struggling to get by

Mother does not want child but takes child because she will get extra money if claiming child, child is not properly taken care of or loved.

Many more...so what now after you forced this child birth?

a reply to: Krakatoa

Since you're being annoying. If you pretend to care about child then yes you are included.

If you claim the child in womb is precious and must be protected but then turn around when child is born and say not my problem, not my tax money.

Then you are included.

a reply to: G0DK1LL3R

So.

You accept the challenge?

a reply to: stormson

The Woman is a " Wishy Washy " Lying Female . I doubt She Will be getting much Awake Male Votes considering the Feminine Nature She Exudes to " Most " Men who are Familiar With it ...........