It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: thedigirati
instead of ONE "misfiled" FISA
That would have to be proven first in a court.
What happens if they are found to not be misfiled? Just hypothetically.
Ms. Jackson Lee. "In addition, in the instance of any matter brought to your attention, such as the Hillary Clinton emails, would there be anything that you would offer today that would suggest that you felt the individual, former Secretary Clinton, should have been prosecuted?"
Ms. Lynch. "No. I reviewed the matter was brought to me by my team, and I was satisfied with their in depth and thorough analysis, and I felt that they were absolutely correct."
Ms. Jackson Lee. "And nothing today would cause you to change your mind, or when you made the decision?"
Ms. Lynch. "No, nothing has occurred to change my determination."
Ms. Jackson Lee. "Do you see any reason to prosecute Secretary Clinton at this time?"
Ms. Lynch. "Based on the facts that were brought to me and the legal analysis that was done, there was not a case"
Mr. Nadler. "And would you agree that hadthe knowledge of the fact that the FBI was investigating the Trump campaign been made public during the campaign, either by Agent Strzok leaking it or by some other method, it might have had an impact on the campaign?"
Ms. Lynch. "I am only being careful because I don't want to characterize the work that was being done in the summer of 2016 as an investigation of the campaign. I just don't want to describe it in that way since it relates to ongoing matters."