It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Comey or Brennan Certified and Pushed the Fake Anti-Trump Dossier that Hillary Paid For.

page: 3
50
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 17 2019 @ 12:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: chr0naut
At last report, about 80% of the Steele was verified and correct. We also know of a number of those facts from the Mueller report.

Citation please... or you are lying, either out of ignorance, being misled, or intentionally.




posted on May, 17 2019 @ 01:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: icanteven
Anyway, the pee tape thing continues to persist, IMHO, because it's believable.

Maybe, if you are a brain dead moron.



posted on May, 17 2019 @ 01:23 PM
link   
a reply to: DJMSN

Lol, I saw where it was reported that Comey tried to blackmail Trump and Trump gave him the bird, the next day the bogus investigation started. He was trying to use the bs dossier to blackmail Trump like good old J E Hoover, Trump knew that it was a crock and told Comey to go f himself. I will try to find the sorce but facts are for some reason more and more difficult to find on the politiweb. I think it may have been on youtube or how about you go and find the story that points out your point is pointless poli jargon trying to defend the criminal actions of those committing them. That would make you an accomplice tho.



posted on May, 17 2019 @ 01:29 PM
link   
Rumors going around that Comey and Brennan were active communists in the early 80's.



posted on May, 18 2019 @ 12:43 AM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Dfairlite
a reply to: chr0naut



Stellar journalism on show for all to see!


Why don't you leftists have ANY self awareness? Like any at all?


I am not a leftist.

I am a capitalist, I believe in family and uphold the rule of law. I believe that there are clear and unquestionable human rights and that they should never be transgressed. I am a born-again Christian. I believe in small, decentralized and strongly regulated government with checks and balances. I believe in democracy in the terms of one person, one vote. I believe in individualism tempered with the fact that we must love God above everything but we must love others as we love ourselves.

The truth is an absolute, not something that is situational or socially acceptable.

Ideologically, I sit between the left and the right and strenuously oppose extremism of all forms.

I know myself. I'm as self aware as you are.



Oh boy
Post history is a wonderful function here.
Interesting timing as well.


But you assume that only leftists are critical of Trump and because I am critical, that I am a leftist.

The accusations against Trump are that he collaborated with the Russians. That Trump is a Commie. An extreme leftist.



posted on May, 19 2019 @ 07:53 AM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

And yet, with all of that self aggrandizement, you were still unable to address the point I was inferring. Let me spell it out for you. Your hot takes are far more often, wrong, than the average. So to disparage the work of others (in this case, fox and washignton examiner) as being less than stellar, is ironic. Then you can take it deeper and see you're complaining about them naming their sources and their sources being former xxxxx, meanwhile for the last two years you have run around screaming about every wapo story. Nevermind that 90% of their stories were based on "anonymous sources."

LOL



posted on May, 19 2019 @ 08:29 AM
link   
a reply to: Dfairlite

Anonymous sources and turned out to be incorrect more often than not.

Then we have CNN, that ran an article, had their source come on CNN to say that he was not their source (when he was), then the source finally came forward and admitted he was the source and the article was wrong. CNN refused to retract the anti-Trump story even then, and kept running it. It was of course proven fake news soon after.
edit on 19-5-2019 by OccamsRazor04 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 19 2019 @ 05:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: Dfairlite
a reply to: chr0naut

And yet, with all of that self aggrandizement, you were still unable to address the point I was inferring. Let me spell it out for you. Your hot takes are far more often, wrong, than the average. So to disparage the work of others (in this case, fox and washignton examiner) as being less than stellar, is ironic. Then you can take it deeper and see you're complaining about them naming their sources and their sources being former xxxxx, meanwhile for the last two years you have run around screaming about every wapo story. Nevermind that 90% of their stories were based on "anonymous sources."

LOL


I'm not an American. I don't watch American news. I don't read American newspapers.

When debating with Americans, on American issues, I have used American internet sources but I usually check fairly extensively into the sources they provide.

I do this because I have found that most American news sources (regardless of their political leaning) are 98% opinion and 2% substance.

I don't accept anonymous sources anymore, in the same way, I don't accept a media outlet referencing an opinion piece as if it is supportive evidence. I am critical of it, which is why when I saw the circle jerk article, I called it out.

Apparently, that offends you.



posted on May, 20 2019 @ 03:10 PM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

British news sources are the same, especially the BBC.




top topics



 
50
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join