It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Vroomfondel
Just for fun, lets say I am a schizophrenic. I have more than 5 million distinctly separate personalities. Each and every one of them wants to vote. Its who I identify as, at any given moment and that is all that counts, right liberals?
So here it is: I like Trump. So do I. Me too. Yeah, me too. I'm right there with ya. Me too. Count me in. And so on for the rest of me.
A few more people like me and that should take care of the illegal vote. Now, lets get on with the real election...
originally posted by: Vroomfondel
a reply to: chr0naut
Nope and nope. Its more of a 'liberals love to create new perceptions of themselves and demand to be respected and treated as whatever they decide to be that day' kind of thing. Why stop with choosing genders or ethnicities? Having multiple personalities who all demand a vote is just as valid.
It would seem that the requirement of mental illness requirement for liberals is not hypothetical. But thats just 'us'.
originally posted by: sine.nomine
Just posturing and identity politics.
originally posted by: TonyS
a reply to: infolurker
The only thing left to the States will be the Senate.
originally posted by: Vroomfondel
a reply to: chr0naut
Nope and nope. Its more of a 'liberals love to create new perceptions of themselves and demand to be respected and treated as whatever they decide to be that day' kind of thing. Why stop with choosing genders or ethnicities? Having multiple personalities who all demand a vote is just as valid.
It would seem that the requirement of mental illness requirement for liberals is not hypothetical. But thats just 'us'.
originally posted by: Elton
Bypassing the electoral college sounds like a bad idea.
Lower population states will not have as much say as the coasts.