It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Clapper: Barr Should Wait For IG Report, We Don't Need More Investigations

page: 2
28
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 14 2019 @ 02:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Dfairlite

Barr already has the IG report. He is coordinating its findings with the two Federal prosecutors now.


Also with the FBI, Wray is involved.

As are a few intelligence agency Directors.

🙂


edit on 14-5-2019 by Lumenari because: (no reason given)




posted on May, 14 2019 @ 02:49 PM
link   

edit on 14-5-2019 by Lumenari because: oop



posted on May, 14 2019 @ 03:46 PM
link   
Another Democrat trying to change a river flow........😆

Democrat Congressman: No Need for Additional Review of FBI, It’s ‘Political'

"If they want to do a review, they can do a review, but it's a total distraction," Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) said Tuesday, following reports that Attorney General William Barr has asked the U.S. Attorney in Connecticut to look into the origins of the FBI's Trump-Russia investigation.

Khanna said James Baker, the former general counsel for the FBI, has made it clear the Trump-Russia investigation "had nothing to do with the (Steele) dossier.



posted on May, 14 2019 @ 03:48 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Almost every Democrat in Congress from California is earning money from illegal activities, ranging from drugs to human trafficking.



posted on May, 14 2019 @ 03:53 PM
link   
a reply to: Lumenari

As usual the liberal media and there low IQ commentators are behind the curve.

They are still saying that bar shouldn't start additional investigations.

If they knew how to read, they would know that prosecutor Durham has been working for weeks to identify and prepare prosecution of Deep State criminals.



posted on May, 14 2019 @ 03:54 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

It would help if you would provide a translation for those links, like this:

"If they want to do a review, they can do a review, but it's a total distraction," Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) said Tuesday, following reports that Attorney General William Barr has asked the U.S. Attorney in Connecticut to look into the origins of the FBI's Trump-Russia investigation.

Khanna said James Baker, the former general counsel for the FBI, has made it clear the Trump-Russia investigation "had nothing to do with the (Steele) dossier.


Translation:

 

"There's nothing we can do to stop the review, but no one pay any attention to it because it will show how criminal we are," Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) said Tuesday, following reports that Attorney General William Barr has asked the U.S. Attorney in Connecticut to look into the origins of the FBI's Trump-Russia investigation.

Khanna said James Baker, the former general counsel for the FBI, has made it clear he will lie about anything he needs to in order to stay out of jail.
 


TheRedneck



posted on May, 14 2019 @ 04:00 PM
link   
a reply to: rickymouse

In truth, this should teach everyone how precarious is our way of governance.

We tend to think we are immune from any quick deterioration, but we could fall as fast as any government in history. It only takes a little more than what we've seen over the last two years.

Honestly, even now, I'm not sure we've dodged that bullet.

Time will tell.



posted on May, 14 2019 @ 04:00 PM
link   
This is great, couldn't ask for more.

lets good times lul.



posted on May, 14 2019 @ 04:29 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Democrats won't be able to use the 'it's political" attack anymore. Now..CiA Haspel, DNi Coats and and FBi Wray are all working together with AG Barr to investigate Spygate.

The Dems can not legitimately attack Barr's investigations now for being political or the prez going after his enemies. But then again, they do have TDS...so they will anyway.

Great thread unroll by @Kevin Corke from Fox news. He says..."keep your popcorn ready, you're almost at the best part of the movie"!

twitter.com...



posted on May, 14 2019 @ 05:43 PM
link   
a reply to: W0LF3


There are only two lines in the entire report that are actually redacted. There is also a fully unredacted version available for members of Congress to view. To date, none have bothered to view the unredacted version, but instead, have chosen to cry about not being to see it whenever and wherever they want. They only claim that they are not being given access to fool people like yourself.
edit on 14-5-2019 by timequake because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 14 2019 @ 06:18 PM
link   
a reply to: Lumenari

Can you point to any particular part of the report which establishes no evidence of trump/rusiia interference? I cant find that page...

I wonder where Barr wants to start looking for the hoax to have come from. Should make America great for at least 2 more years just talking about it.



posted on May, 14 2019 @ 06:50 PM
link   
a reply to: W0LF3

They didn't. Basically the entire report is available. Only the parts that legally can't be unredacted weren't.

Why have zero Democrats looked?



posted on May, 14 2019 @ 06:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
Another Democrat trying to change a river flow........😆

Democrat Congressman: No Need for Additional Review of FBI, It’s ‘Political'

"If they want to do a review, they can do a review, but it's a total distraction," Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) said Tuesday, following reports that Attorney General William Barr has asked the U.S. Attorney in Connecticut to look into the origins of the FBI's Trump-Russia investigation.

Khanna said James Baker, the former general counsel for the FBI, has made it clear the Trump-Russia investigation "had nothing to do with the (Steele) dossier.




Obsturcution of Justice - by the Democrats own rules.



posted on May, 14 2019 @ 06:54 PM
link   
a reply to: sunkuong

Yes. The entire part. One specific part is where it discussed Russia reaching out to Trump associates and Russia being rebuffed every time.



posted on May, 14 2019 @ 06:57 PM
link   
Yeesus. How many of us didnt see this coming? How pathetic is it to now change the narrative and escape their comeuppance? Man I swear, everyday is a new low for the Dem slimeballs.



posted on May, 15 2019 @ 10:18 PM
link   
a reply to: W0LF3

Because if cops investigated you for some trumped up honey and determined you were innocent they are not going to put the whole investigation out there for public viewing are they? No so why should this be any different.



posted on May, 16 2019 @ 07:53 AM
link   
a reply to: proteus33

He's wrong. No one is denied. There is a completely unredacted version for Congress to view. The only redactions are the ones that legally must be there, such as grand jury information. It is illegal to unredact it. WOLF is just parroting fake news CNN and their ilk.



new topics

top topics



 
28
<< 1   >>

log in

join