Roger Stone Asks for Evidence Russians Hacked DNC Server

Roger Stone (Trump associate under indictment) has requested actual proof that Russians hacked the DNC server !!!

He's in a trial and without absolute proof, he may have a case for dismissal !!

Kinda tricky because the FBI and Mueller somehow concluded the Russian did it !!

But the trick is: The FBI never took psychical possession of the DNC server.

It was reportedly destroyed by the DNC people !!

The "reliance" seems to be by a contractor and a supposed "image" set of the server's hard drive (the hard drive is also not "available") 😆

There was a big scandal at the time after the DNC documents were released to the public and the FBI was denied "access to" the actual systems 😎

Roger Stone Asks for Evidence Russians Hacked DNC Server – Court Won’t Provide It Because They Don’t Have the Proof

Roger Stone is requesting proof that the Russians hacked the DNC server, as was reported in the Mueller report. He claims if the Russians didn’t hack the DNC, his case should be dismissed. The problem for the Mueller team is that they and the FBI have never reportedly actually looked at the server.


Roger Stone and his legal team are requesting the report from Crowdstrike, the firm connected with the Deep State who reportedly did inspect the DNC server after emails were released by WikiLeaks.

heir position is that if the Mueller team did not inspect the server, or the FBI, then how can they know that the server was hacked. This logical argument makes sense –

"The DNC has everything locked up tight or destroyed to "preserve" the cover-up"

a reply to: xuenchen

That should be easy to find.
It's right under obamas college admissions, trumps tax returns, hillarys hard drive and tom Brady's cell phone....

Two Articles from Jan 2017 ........... 😆


(Jan 10 2017) Comey: DNC denied FBI's requests for access to hacked servers

The FBI requested direct access to the Democratic National Committee’s (DNC) hacked computer servers but was denied, Director James Comey told lawmakers on Tuesday.

The bureau made “multiple requests at different levels,” according to Comey, but ultimately struck an agreement with the DNC that a “highly respected private company” would get access and share what it found with investigators.

“We’d always prefer to have access hands-on ourselves if that’s possible,” Comey said, noting that he didn’t know why the DNC rebuffed the FBI’s request.

(Jan 10 2017) FBI DENIED access to DNC servers:

After the DNC's computer was hacked, the FBI requested the DNC's servers in order to conduct their investigation.

The DNC denied the FBI access to their servers.

Why would the DNC deny the FBI access to it's servers?

Also, since when does the FBI rely on a 3rd party company to do it's investigations FOR THEM?

while I think stone is a slimy individual who probably deserves jail time..

IN this case I am rooting for him to seriously stick it to the system, turn that used car salesman vibe into something good for once in breaking some more of this story wide open.

originally posted by: xuenchen
Two Articles from Jan 2017 ........... 😆


(Jan 10 2017) Comey: DNC denied FBI's requests for access to hacked servers

The FBI requested direct access to the Democratic National Committee’s (DNC) hacked computer servers but was denied, Director James Comey told lawmakers on Tuesday.

The bureau made “multiple requests at different levels,” according to Comey, but ultimately struck an agreement with the DNC that a “highly respected private company” would get access and share what it found with investigators.

“We’d always prefer to have access hands-on ourselves if that’s possible,” Comey said, noting that he didn’t know why the DNC rebuffed the FBI’s request.

(Jan 10 2017) FBI DENIED access to DNC servers:

After the DNC's computer was hacked, the FBI requested the DNC's servers in order to conduct their investigation.

The DNC denied the FBI access to their servers.

Why would the DNC deny the FBI access to it's servers?

Also, since when does the FBI rely on a 3rd party company to do it's investigations FOR THEM?

Must be nice to be able to tell the FBI to go screw themselves, and they do it.

Crowdstrike was working for the DNC when they analyzed the server. You literally cannot have a bigger conflict of interests than they had.

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan

originally posted by: xuenchen
Two Articles from Jan 2017 ........... 😆


(Jan 10 2017) Comey: DNC denied FBI's requests for access to hacked servers

The FBI requested direct access to the Democratic National Committee’s (DNC) hacked computer servers but was denied, Director James Comey told lawmakers on Tuesday.

The bureau made “multiple requests at different levels,” according to Comey, but ultimately struck an agreement with the DNC that a “highly respected private company” would get access and share what it found with investigators.

“We’d always prefer to have access hands-on ourselves if that’s possible,” Comey said, noting that he didn’t know why the DNC rebuffed the FBI’s request.

(Jan 10 2017) FBI DENIED access to DNC servers:

After the DNC's computer was hacked, the FBI requested the DNC's servers in order to conduct their investigation.

The DNC denied the FBI access to their servers.

Why would the DNC deny the FBI access to it's servers?

Also, since when does the FBI rely on a 3rd party company to do it's investigations FOR THEM?

Must be nice to be able to tell the FBI to go screw themselves, and they do it.

Crowdstrike was working for the DNC when they analyzed the server. You literally cannot have a bigger conflict of interests than they had.

They should'a got a FISA Warrant 😆

a reply to: xuenchen

Roger Stone has requested actual proof that Russians hacked the DNC server !!!

Absent some actual proof, Can TPTB just conjure up some shady individual from the Ministry of Truth to certify the russians did it....

originally posted by: Infoshill

a reply to: xuenchen

Roger Stone has requested actual proof that Russians hacked the DNC server !!!

Absent some actual proof, Can TPTB just conjure up some shady individual from the Ministry of Truth to certify the russians did it....

That would be the FBI "reports" from the time, and the "conclusions" from the contractor CrowdStrike.

2 very trustworthy organizations "at the time" 💥😆💥

a reply to: xuenchen

Oops
More that they thought would NEVER see the light of day.
Discovery can be a bear.

Roger Stone Asks for Evidence Russians Hacked DNC Server

The metadata was in those 30,000 emails Clinton deleted.

a reply to: xuenchen

Why was it "not possible" for the FBI to actually have the DNC Server and Hard Drive in its possession to prove an International Event of the scope of Russia directly spying on a Presidential Campaign?

Wouldn't that be something you'd want to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt?

Between that, and the immunity deals they were handing out like condoms at Spring Break, I knew the whole thing smelled to high heaven.

a reply to: xuenchen

Here is a photo of the DNC server in this New York Times article. Seems to be powered on, but it's hard to tell:

The Perfect Weapon: How Russian Cyberpower Invaded the U.S.

Also, the FBI were given images of the drives quite early on, by Crowdstrike, the cyber security company who were doing the audit.

The server itself was not given to the FBI because they would have to turn it off and disconnect it to do so. Interrupting the analysis and security remediation.

a reply to: xuenchen

That is all in Bill Barr's hands. Basically, Roger Stone is asking for the evidence out of the Mueller report that none of our elected representatives have been privy to yet.

Good luck, I guess.

And we know this is in the Mueller report as companies and individuals that work for GRU have been indicted and Barr himself says that there are millions of pages as evidence to back up the report.

So, it's up to Bill Barr to give it to whomever he chooses. Think he'll give it to Roger Stone over the Congress?

originally posted by: neo96
Roger Stone Asks for Evidence Russians Hacked DNC Server

The metadata was in those 30,000 emails Clinton deleted.

... and how could they know about those deleted e-mails if they didn't have a copy of the server they were deleted from?

a reply to: pavil

Remember WHO was "in power" in 2016 when this all happened ☢

a reply to: chr0naut

The "images" were 2nd and 3rd hand information 😎🐀

a reply to: chr0naut

The Hillary deleted emails were recovered from the servers (she had 4 servers) 💥

a reply to: xuenchen

Did you happen to catch my post on this Roger Stone comedy show over here, www.abovetopsecret.com...

Comey's favorite phrases are getting mighty old - "I don't know", "I don't remember", "I don't recall", "that's a good question, I don't know".

I knew back in Dec that Stone was gonna later bite them in the ass.

originally posted by: pavil
a reply to: xuenchen

Why was it "not possible" for the FBI to actually have the DNC Server and Hard Drive in its possession to prove an International Event of the scope of Russia directly spying on a Presidential Campaign?

Wouldn't that be something you'd want to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt?

Between that, and the immunity deals they were handing out like condoms at Spring Break, I knew the whole thing smelled to high heaven.

Well, really in-depth security audit forensics takes time. If you switch of the server to pass it from location to location, you can't actually be doing any forensics on it.

The first step in any such forensics is to produce a bit-wise image of all the drives, so that you can re-try things if you accidentally mess with the content. You do this by removing the drives and mounting them in a different machine and then imaging them at a low level (called a bitwise image) this ignores format and partitioning on the drive and copies everything identically at the base level.

The other advantage in removing the drives is that you can read data from the side of the data tracks (in a magnetic rerecording HDD). This works because of a thing called magnetic hysteresis which means that magnetic domains spread out over time through the media and that greater energy is required to erase the data than it took to originally write it. This means that older data is still on the media even though overwritten by later magnetization. In a solid state drive, however, this does not work. To do this side-track reading, you have to modify the drive controller hardware. Standard hardware will not allow this type of operation.

The result is that you get two bitwise images for each drive and it is trivial to determine what data has been recently erased, by simply doing a comparison between them.

Once the original drives are imaged, they can be returned to the original machine, which can either continue to be used or it can be rebuilt. The hardware isn't actually the critical component anymore. The data content is.

Crowdstrike provided the FBI with the same images that it was using to do the forensics. Essentially, the FBI had the server, complete and frozen in time at the time the images were made.

Once you have bitwise images, you no longer require the physical server and it is better to mount copies of those images on another machine entirely. In this way, there are no files on the drive locked by the server operating system - you have full access to everything and don't have to fight for access with any the processes that run the server.

Then you do the forensic audit on the data. Looking both for files, and for formats of data similar to files (even in erased space). Also you have the comparison deltas which tell you which stuff to target first.

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: chr0naut

The "images" were 2nd and 3rd hand information 😎🐀

Really? Shows how much you know about data forensics.