It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

UFO sightings dropping FAKE News? / Aliens, ahoy! Navy developing guidelines on UFO sightings

page: 1
7

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 12 2019 @ 07:10 AM
link   
www.navytimes.com...

Hmm, so the Navy is developing...............

So some guy Statistician who cough cough [ever notice this trend] just happens to retire from MUFON, raised some sort of shock throughout the UFO world in 2018 when he said that sightings have significantly dropped. Oh really? Here's the link:

gizmodo.com...

Yes, it was picked up and reported on by another OP here:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Yet in 2019 the US NAVY is proceeding forward? As an Engineer, I went to Graduate school for a Masters in Business Administration [MBA]. It was ranked among the Top 50 schools in the world for MBA by US News & World Report and we used many Case Studies as published by Stanford and Harvard University. In business, heavy use of Statistics and Statistical analysis is the norm. In my career in business I also taught 100's of employees Metrology and Statistical Process Control. I am not a Statistician but I can apply it to manufacturing processes and it can also be applied to Social issues or to the point; UFO sightings.



Metrology is the science of measurement. It establishes a common understanding of units, crucial in linking human activities. Modern metrology has its roots in the French Revolution's political motivation to standardize units in France, when a length standard taken from a natural source was proposed.


My point is why is it that NUFORC & MUFON and others never publish any charts, graphs or statistics on UFO sightings. Oh they have their database but that's all I could find. However no one outside of a couple of married women in Syracuse, New York ever tried to compile the data into statistical trends or probabilities. I mean no concentration diagrams, regression analysis, Weibull Analysis nor any use of predictive software to possibly predict and determine the next when and where these things may show up. Ever hear of the Skunk Works? How about Dr. Robert B. Abernathy. How about the SR78 Blackbird. Anyone?

Well back in the day I was a Director in Senior Management. As a new hire we had a serious warranty product failure situation in a rotating Electro mechanical device across the Globe that was costing millions of dollars in loss annually. I wanted the best predictive software available to determine cause and effect in addition to future prediction of the next when and where and cost. So I called Harvard who directed me to Abernethy. He let us use his software pro bono. I can’t recall whether it was the full SR 78 Monty but we ran with it and our programmers developed a software program that linked our customers 10,000+ global dealerships to our Excel database via MS Access and linked it to Abernathy's Weibull software. It was excellent and worked “back in the day” in real time. Now, I can obtain NUFORC data as I can cut and paste their data into an Excel spreadsheet. I just did it. I also have the entire "back in the day" software program on a computer disk somewhere. I also may reach out to the original Senior Programmer who wrote the code and put the entire "back in the day" software alive. Too bad that Isaac Koi was run off by others. I will reach out to him via his website.

In brief in my opine we have been led astray by the UFO "experts" as we are not much further than 1947 and many PHD's were involved. Possibly by ignorance or possibly by the control of others they just kept on pushing stuff. Software such as described above is probably present among all major players throughout the world. Robert Bigelow should have it. So let’s see what happens.

edit on 12-5-2019 by Waterglass because: typo

edit on 12-5-2019 by Waterglass because: typo

edit on 12-5-2019 by Waterglass because: typo




posted on May, 12 2019 @ 07:16 AM
link   
a reply to: Waterglass

Yep, those UFO folk are wrong in the head, they are manipulated, too much new age mumbojumbo also added there...

Best to just think about our flying friends and go outside to observe,



posted on May, 12 2019 @ 07:25 AM
link   
a reply to: Waterglass

I believe a big problem is not all reports go to one organisation.



posted on May, 12 2019 @ 07:36 AM
link   
a reply to: Peeple

That is true. When I cut and paste NUFORC data I removed the hyperlinks from one column. What was left was code; not a date such as 5-12-2019. So it appears they or someone is harvesting the reports. They know.



posted on May, 12 2019 @ 12:00 PM
link   
a reply to: Waterglass

PMing you



posted on May, 12 2019 @ 12:09 PM
link   
a reply to: Peeple

That is one of the number one problems.
How many reporting sites are there around the world?
There are hundreds. Some well known, others not so much.
The problem is none of these organizations talk to each other.

If there was worldwide cooperation - there would be much further advances in the field.
But everyone wants to keep it to themselves or make others pay to see it.



posted on May, 12 2019 @ 01:42 PM
link   
a reply to: Macenroe82


Got and replied. Hope you see it.



posted on May, 12 2019 @ 02:43 PM
link   
People find other ways to present their information about what they see in our skies. And probably those who do before never got any answers of their sightings so why bother.

And there are those who gladly bring that information over to TTSA and as of now also the Navy want their information collected.

It's like a UFO contest: We need your info and videos so we can stay ahead of the technology and possible landing sites to investigate before the others do?

Or the intergalactic travel agency gave an expire date to not enter the solar system after date:??? and the last time traveling visitors know what's coming to Earth, take a quick history tour and gather some valuable information as a collector's item leave in time before tshtf?


But only that we'll know when it happens..



posted on May, 12 2019 @ 03:37 PM
link   
a reply to: 0bserver1

Agree. Statistical software can predict anything so long as you don't corrupt the data or algorithm to spin it to your view. Thanks for the comment.



new topics

top topics



 
7

log in

join