It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: 3n19m470
a reply to: Agit8dChop
Even smaller levels of nonsense I used to not mind putting up with... I just no longer have the energy to keep pretending.
originally posted by: Agit8dChop
Holding your husbands 'sexual desire' for you, hostage, because some political party doesn't agree with your p.o.v?? Congrats on setting womens liberation back a few centuries and being a very lousy role model for young girls.
F**K the media, in all forms! This crap is toxic and truley is the enemy of the people.
History shows that sex strikes are a surprisingly effective strategy for political change
By Maureen ShawApril 14, 2017
In a recent interview with Marie Claire, singer Janelle Monáe called for a sex strike in the name of women’s rights. “People have to start respecting the vagina,” she said. “Until every man is fighting for our rights, we should consider stopping having sex.”
It’s not such a crazy idea: Women have withheld sex to protest social injustices and advocate for political reform throughout history. Many of these strikes have proven successful—even if Monáe’s idea would likely fail in the US.
Most people associate the idea of sex strikes with the ancient Greek play Lysistrata, in which women team up to bring about the end of the Peloponnesian War. But sex strikes have spanned hundreds of years and multiple countries. In 1600, for example, Iroquois women refused to engage in sex as a way to stop unregulated warfare. The tactic worked: They gained veto power concerning all future wars and paved the way for future feminist rebellions.
qz.com...
originally posted by: MisterSpock
a reply to: NarcolepticBuddha
She'll more than likely still be known in the history books for her desire to lynch kavenaugh in the court of public opinion. You know, rather than an actual court of law.
She's a washed up has been that just has whatever political topic to tie her old dried up boat too for a bit of publicity.
These people are idiots. Ignore them till you cant.
originally posted by: Agit8dChop
2 news items today made me shake my head wondering what kind of future the current #allaboutmyfeelings mentality is creating
An article in today's news paper
How has this even become a social justice needing action? If your job opening is high pressure, stressful, requires quick analytical thinking and can be full on at times.... then you need an applicant with those attributes. People who are nervous about that kind of job description probably shouldn't apply and most likely wouldn't get the job.
Soon, you won't be able to reject peoples job applications in fear of upsetting them.
Then we have Alyssa Milano
Holding your husbands 'sexual desire' for you, hostage, because some political party doesn't agree with your p.o.v?? Congrats on setting womens liberation back a few centuries and being a very lousy role model for young girls.
F**K the media, in all forms! This crap is toxic and truley is the enemy of the people.
Todays front page news paper (in an Australian city) is a 4 page spread on the new royal baby..... the ROYAL BABY!!!!!... Alexander Downer (a previous high profile Aus politician) has just been outed as a US intel drone who played a big part in framing the US president for treason.. yet, we have a 4 page expose on a british baby....
we are breeding a dangerous future and sleep walking into societies demise.
originally posted by: RandomPerson
Guys, it’s time.
If we all throw in $20, we’ll eventually have enough to build a rocket we can strap ourselves to and go populate some other less-retarded planet.
Who’s in?