It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: 727Sky
Keep you key board warmed up.... now that the Mueller report is closed and the dems can not claim obstruction of justice for exposing them .... I expect more and more revelations... I just hope there are more than revelations as there are actual convictions and jail time handed out.
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: xuenchen
Please explain how the outcome of a court case is illegal in some way?
I mean, the FISA court is literally a legal process.
Maybe the answer is:
People applying for the warrant lied to the presiding judge ? 😆👏
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: xuenchen
Please explain how the outcome of a court case is illegal in some way?
I mean, the FISA court is literally a legal process.
Maybe the answer is:
People applying for the warrant lied to the presiding judge ? 😆👏
I'm also fairly sure that the Steele dossier did, and does not, meet the requirements of legal evidence and therefore was not, itself, ever presented to the FISA courts.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: chr0naut
Mueller Will Not Testify Next Week, but Democrats Are Not Giving Up
www.nytimes.com...
Try again.
Amendment IV........
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
😎😷
........... Therefore, if there is a preliminary showing that a police officer made false statements in the search warrant affidavit, either knowingly or intentionally or with reckless disregard for the truth, then a suppression hearing may be held. And if it is established during the suppression hearing that the police officer who requested the affidavit of probable cause committed perjury or a “reckless disregard for the truth” regarding a statement on which the probable cause finding was based, then the search warrant may be deemed invalid and any resulting physical evidence may be suppressed as “Fruit of the poisonous tree”.
originally posted by: Tarzan the apeman.
a reply to: DBCowboy
“It won’t be next week,” Representative Jerrold Nadler of New York, the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, told reporters on Friday. “He will come at some point,” he added. “If necessary, we’ll subpoena him.”
Wow, it may look like Muller doesn't even want to show up to the dog and pony show. Would his testimony be any different if he wasn't in the DOJ? Just curious how it would work.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: chr0naut
All Trump did was "say" Mueller shouldn't testify. 😆
There's no "official" orders. 🈸
You know that?
Consider that your boss tells the press "He isn't going to do (whatever)".
Do you think that isn't a directive?
The presenters of the evidence would be the culprits and would be in contempt of court for fraud.
originally posted by: Rewey
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: xuenchen
Please explain how the outcome of a court case is illegal in some way?
I mean, the FISA court is literally a legal process.
Maybe the answer is:
People applying for the warrant lied to the presiding judge ? 😆👏
I'm also fairly sure that the Steele dossier did, and does not, meet the requirements of legal evidence and therefore was not, itself, ever presented to the FISA courts.
Wow. I don't even know where to start with this...
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: xuenchen
Mueller himself is trying to avoid this, I heard that he is not testifying now.