It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: OneBigMonkeyToo
The conclusion it tends to start with is "I am right, everyone else isn't, your evidence is wrong because hey look over there a bunny rabbit, buy my t-shirt".
originally posted by: turbonium1
If the craters were caused by meteor impacts, there would be debris found outside the craters, from displaced material, etc.
originally posted by: Justoneman
a reply to: wildespace
Couldn't you get a "Crater" with a hole instead of what looks like a protrusion to make your point please? I am sure there are tons of them.
I can agree with your concepts in principle here, but that pic says Volcano to me.
originally posted by: OneBigMonkeyToo
originally posted by: Justoneman
a reply to: wildespace
Couldn't you get a "Crater" with a hole instead of what looks like a protrusion to make your point please? I am sure there are tons of them.
I can agree with your concepts in principle here, but that pic says Volcano to me.
It's not a protrusion, your eyes are reading it incorrectly. Have some more examples:
www.lroc.asu.edu...
spaceref.com...
e2a:
South ray crater, Descartes highlands, as viewed using a 3D model I made using LRO data: