It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

57% Of Democrats believe Trump is guilty of Treason

page: 4
48
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 8 2019 @ 02:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krakatoa

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: network dude

I'll just post this here:

STATEMENT BY FORMER FEDERAL PROSECUTORS

At the time I posted this link, there were 735 DOJ Alumni who have put their signatures to this petition.


As Aerosmith sings DREAM ON!
We don't buy their BS anymore. You know that but keep working for the Bastards.

Paid shills for the DNC lost their standing with Americans. PERIOD.

The DNC and the RINO's have gamed our system. We ARE taking it back. DJT has given the US step one and Swamp Draining has begun in earnest.


I would love to get paid for my opinion. Whom do I contact to give my details?

Ah yes, it is Trump that is the only honest one, not all these hundreds of prosecutors.

The casino owner, with two soviet wives, the reality TV 'personality' (why would a billionaire do that for 14 seasons? Wouldn't he make more money by concentrating on his business ventures?), who lies openly and repeatedly and contradicts himself, who made several attempts to obstruct the course of justice, with multiple ongoing court cases against him and a past history of many cases which he lost, who will not reveal his tax records, who we know has paid for prostitutes, who throws his closest associates under the bus to protect himself, who held a penthouse room booked for Bin Laden (until the money stopped)...

A paragon of virtue.


And how does anything the original posted stated infer that they support those personal "virtue" traits you mentioned? The comment was in regards to the political gaming of the system, and not personal attacks upon them. Yet, you resorted to just that approach? Why is that again? Personal hatred for the man? Frankly, I don;t give a furry rat's butt about personal "virtuous" accusations, but actual results doing a job. That is a big difference, many conservatives judge upon results at a job, not virtue signals form detractors.


There are many who say that everyone else is lying as if Trump is an angel.

Put a toupee on the Lex Luthor character and he'd probably look like Trump (he got to be POTUS in the DC comics stories, too).





posted on May, 8 2019 @ 02:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krakatoa

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: underpass61

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: network dude

I'll just post this here:

STATEMENT BY FORMER FEDERAL PROSECUTORS

At the time I posted this link, there were 735 DOJ Alumni who have put their signatures to this petition.


I am usually good at finding the clue in things like this, but I honestly can't find the link between what the OP is about and your post. It looks like some insanely weak attempt to point at Trump and say "see, orange man BAD!", but I'd like to think you are a little smarter than that. Throw me a bone. Explain the link.



If there was obstruction, then Trump was acting guiltily about the allegations under investigation - of conspiring with an enemy state, granting them control over the outcomes of the processes of government of the US.


You know, from my perspective he was acting pissed off. What exactly is the criteria for "acting guiltily"?


You do stupid stuff like trying to stop investigations that will expose your guilt and incriminate you.


Where is the guilt, please SHOW IS ALL you wizard of thoughts? I guess being unjustly accused of heinous crimes would simply make you happy and warm and fuzzy?

How virtuous of you.......



Why would he risk everything (the Presidency, his reputation, his financial standing and even his freedom) to obstruct the investigation?

He could just be incredibly stupid or he could feel guilty enough about something that it is worth the risk.

If it were me, I wouldn't try and impede any investigation (unless I was actually guilty).

edit on 8/5/2019 by chr0naut because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 8 2019 @ 02:38 PM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

Or he could have felt like he was directly under attack and needed to defend himself, as surmised by Mueller.

Its not obstruction to speak truthfully. That is called "free speech". Its not obstruction when there is no crime present.

What IS obstruction is releasing grand jury materials.

I know you hate Trump...but don't suspend truth and reality just to grind your axe.



posted on May, 8 2019 @ 02:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: underpass61

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: network dude

I'll just post this here:

STATEMENT BY FORMER FEDERAL PROSECUTORS

At the time I posted this link, there were 735 DOJ Alumni who have put their signatures to this petition.


I am usually good at finding the clue in things like this, but I honestly can't find the link between what the OP is about and your post. It looks like some insanely weak attempt to point at Trump and say "see, orange man BAD!", but I'd like to think you are a little smarter than that. Throw me a bone. Explain the link.



If there was obstruction, then Trump was acting guiltily about the allegations under investigation - of conspiring with an enemy state, granting them control over the outcomes of the processes of government of the US.


You know, from my perspective he was acting pissed off. What exactly is the criteria for "acting guiltily"?


They do stupid stuff like trying to stop investigations that will expose their guilt and incriminate them.


Oh, I get it now thanks. By the way, have you stopped beating your wife? Just askin'



posted on May, 8 2019 @ 03:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: underpass61

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: underpass61

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: network dude

I'll just post this here:

STATEMENT BY FORMER FEDERAL PROSECUTORS

At the time I posted this link, there were 735 DOJ Alumni who have put their signatures to this petition.


I am usually good at finding the clue in things like this, but I honestly can't find the link between what the OP is about and your post. It looks like some insanely weak attempt to point at Trump and say "see, orange man BAD!", but I'd like to think you are a little smarter than that. Throw me a bone. Explain the link.



If there was obstruction, then Trump was acting guiltily about the allegations under investigation - of conspiring with an enemy state, granting them control over the outcomes of the processes of government of the US.


You know, from my perspective he was acting pissed off. What exactly is the criteria for "acting guiltily"?


They do stupid stuff like trying to stop investigations that will expose their guilt and incriminate them.


Oh, I get it now thanks. By the way, have you stopped beating your wife? Just askin'


Nah, I can't stop.

I never started.



By the way, feel free to investigate by speaking to my wife and children. I am confident of my innocence of the accusation.

See how that works.

How did Trump respond?



posted on May, 8 2019 @ 06:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: network dude

I'll just post this here:

STATEMENT BY FORMER FEDERAL PROSECUTORS

At the time I posted this link, there were 735 DOJ Alumni who have put their signatures to this petition.




As Aerosmith sings DREAM ON!
We don't buy their BS anymore. You know that but keep working for the Bastards.

Paid shills for the DNC lost their standing with Americans. PERIOD.

The DNC and the RINO's have gamed our system. We ARE taking it back. DJT has given the US step one and Swamp Draining has begun in earnest.


I would love to get paid for my opinion. Whom do I contact to give my details?

Ah yes, it is Trump that is the only honest one, not all these hundreds of prosecutors.

The casino owner, with two soviet wives, the reality TV 'personality' (why would a billionaire do that for 14 seasons? Wouldn't he make more money by concentrating on his business ventures?), who lies openly and repeatedly and contradicts himself, who made several attempts to obstruct the course of justice, with multiple ongoing court cases against him and a past history of many cases which he lost, who will not reveal his tax records, who we know has paid for prostitutes, who throws his closest associates under the bus to protect himself, who held a penthouse room booked for Bin Laden (until the money stopped)...

A paragon of virtue.


You appear to be getting paid if not you are going out of your way to make YOURSELF look horrible. It needs to pay you if you're going to have that issue. It needs to pay a lot to give up self esteem for it.
edit on 8-5-2019 by Justoneman because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 9 2019 @ 03:47 AM
link   

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: network dude

I'll just post this here:

STATEMENT BY FORMER FEDERAL PROSECUTORS

At the time I posted this link, there were 735 DOJ Alumni who have put their signatures to this petition.




As Aerosmith sings DREAM ON!
We don't buy their BS anymore. You know that but keep working for the Bastards.

Paid shills for the DNC lost their standing with Americans. PERIOD.

The DNC and the RINO's have gamed our system. We ARE taking it back. DJT has given the US step one and Swamp Draining has begun in earnest.


I would love to get paid for my opinion. Whom do I contact to give my details?

Ah yes, it is Trump that is the only honest one, not all these hundreds of prosecutors.

The casino owner, with two soviet wives, the reality TV 'personality' (why would a billionaire do that for 14 seasons? Wouldn't he make more money by concentrating on his business ventures?), who lies openly and repeatedly and contradicts himself, who made several attempts to obstruct the course of justice, with multiple ongoing court cases against him and a past history of many cases which he lost, who will not reveal his tax records, who we know has paid for prostitutes, who throws his closest associates under the bus to protect himself, who held a penthouse room booked for Bin Laden (until the money stopped)...

A paragon of virtue.


You appear to be getting paid if not you are going out of your way to make YOURSELF look horrible. It needs to pay you if you're going to have that issue. It needs to pay a lot to give up self esteem for it.


I linked to supporting facts. Many of them have been proven true beyond question. In bygone years, any one of them would have sufficient to wrest public office from corrupt officials.

Today, fake news and PR overrides rule of law, at least as far as many seem to believe.



posted on May, 9 2019 @ 05:16 AM
link   

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: underpass61

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: underpass61

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: network dude

I'll just post this here:

STATEMENT BY FORMER FEDERAL PROSECUTORS

At the time I posted this link, there were 735 DOJ Alumni who have put their signatures to this petition.


I am usually good at finding the clue in things like this, but I honestly can't find the link between what the OP is about and your post. It looks like some insanely weak attempt to point at Trump and say "see, orange man BAD!", but I'd like to think you are a little smarter than that. Throw me a bone. Explain the link.



If there was obstruction, then Trump was acting guiltily about the allegations under investigation - of conspiring with an enemy state, granting them control over the outcomes of the processes of government of the US.


You know, from my perspective he was acting pissed off. What exactly is the criteria for "acting guiltily"?


They do stupid stuff like trying to stop investigations that will expose their guilt and incriminate them.


Oh, I get it now thanks. By the way, have you stopped beating your wife? Just askin'


Nah, I can't stop.

I never started.



By the way, feel free to investigate by speaking to my wife and children. I am confident of my innocence of the accusation.

See how that works.

How did Trump respond?


but you miss the point. Long before you are allowed to express your innocence, the crime listed will be plastered all over the news, and everyone who sees you will automatically think you are a wife beater. Only after some time, will your innocence be shown. But I'm sure you are good with all that, since you are innocent and all.

Reality, it's a cool place, check it out some time.



posted on May, 9 2019 @ 05:30 AM
link   

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: underpass61

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: underpass61

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: network dude

I'll just post this here:

STATEMENT BY FORMER FEDERAL PROSECUTORS

At the time I posted this link, there were 735 DOJ Alumni who have put their signatures to this petition.


I am usually good at finding the clue in things like this, but I honestly can't find the link between what the OP is about and your post. It looks like some insanely weak attempt to point at Trump and say "see, orange man BAD!", but I'd like to think you are a little smarter than that. Throw me a bone. Explain the link.



If there was obstruction, then Trump was acting guiltily about the allegations under investigation - of conspiring with an enemy state, granting them control over the outcomes of the processes of government of the US.


You know, from my perspective he was acting pissed off. What exactly is the criteria for "acting guiltily"?


They do stupid stuff like trying to stop investigations that will expose their guilt and incriminate them.


Oh, I get it now thanks. By the way, have you stopped beating your wife? Just askin'


Nah, I can't stop.

I never started.



By the way, feel free to investigate by speaking to my wife and children. I am confident of my innocence of the accusation.

See how that works.

How did Trump respond?


but you miss the point. Long before you are allowed to express your innocence, the crime listed will be plastered all over the news, and everyone who sees you will automatically think you are a wife beater. Only after some time, will your innocence be shown. But I'm sure you are good with all that, since you are innocent and all.

Reality, it's a cool place, check it out some time.


I know, you have really poor news services in the US, don't you?

It's probably your own faults, really, because you insist on believing what they say, when all they do is regurgitate opinion on opinion without limit and standards.

You see, if news was the truth, all news outlets would say the same thing. There would be no partisan slant and differing commentary. The truth is the truth. An absolute. So news services that give differing views of events are clearly not giving you the truth.

As such, It would be most savvy to disbelieve what they are saying and to go back to sources and look for subtext, especially where the disagreement is most obvious.

Of course, I'm not from America and I have not been indoctrinated from birth. I have no particular allegiance to the US because it isn't my country.

edit on 9/5/2019 by chr0naut because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 9 2019 @ 06:03 AM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

wow, so you used all those words to say you don't have a clue how things work in the US. Can't say I'm surprised. When your nation can be persuaded by a lunatic who says he wants to remove your guns, kills some folks, and you comply, you are a special kind of something. And it's not smart.



posted on May, 9 2019 @ 07:45 AM
link   
The walkaway movement so far is taking away roughly 400,000 voters with them. Saw a guy in interview with Levin ... die hard Dem now says he’s more conservative than he ever knew. He felt totally disillusioned when he saw for himself that the liberal media had lied.



posted on May, 9 2019 @ 07:52 AM
link   

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: underpass61

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: underpass61

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: network dude

I'll just post this here:

STATEMENT BY FORMER FEDERAL PROSECUTORS

At the time I posted this link, there were 735 DOJ Alumni who have put their signatures to this petition.


I am usually good at finding the clue in things like this, but I honestly can't find the link between what the OP is about and your post. It looks like some insanely weak attempt to point at Trump and say "see, orange man BAD!", but I'd like to think you are a little smarter than that. Throw me a bone. Explain the link.



If there was obstruction, then Trump was acting guiltily about the allegations under investigation - of conspiring with an enemy state, granting them control over the outcomes of the processes of government of the US.


You know, from my perspective he was acting pissed off. What exactly is the criteria for "acting guiltily"?


They do stupid stuff like trying to stop investigations that will expose their guilt and incriminate them.


Oh, I get it now thanks. By the way, have you stopped beating your wife? Just askin'


Nah, I can't stop.

I never started.



By the way, feel free to investigate by speaking to my wife and children. I am confident of my innocence of the accusation.

See how that works.

How did Trump respond?


but you miss the point. Long before you are allowed to express your innocence, the crime listed will be plastered all over the news, and everyone who sees you will automatically think you are a wife beater. Only after some time, will your innocence be shown. But I'm sure you are good with all that, since you are innocent and all.

Reality, it's a cool place, check it out some time.


I know, you have really poor news services in the US, don't you?

It's probably your own faults, really, because you insist on believing what they say, when all they do is regurgitate opinion on opinion without limit and standards.

You see, if news was the truth, all news outlets would say the same thing. There would be no partisan slant and differing commentary. The truth is the truth. An absolute. So news services that give differing views of events are clearly not giving you the truth.

As such, It would be most savvy to disbelieve what they are saying and to go back to sources and look for subtext, especially where the disagreement is most obvious.

Of course, I'm not from America and I have not been indoctrinated from birth. I have no particular allegiance to the US because it isn't my country.
. You might have a point. If CNN and msnbc were truth they would not have a differing opinion from Fox and OAN. But it is pretty funny to watch all the liberal outlets falling all over themselves to say the same liberal script.
edit on 9-5-2019 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 9 2019 @ 09:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: underpass61

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: underpass61

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: network dude

I'll just post this here:

STATEMENT BY FORMER FEDERAL PROSECUTORS

At the time I posted this link, there were 735 DOJ Alumni who have put their signatures to this petition.


I am usually good at finding the clue in things like this, but I honestly can't find the link between what the OP is about and your post. It looks like some insanely weak attempt to point at Trump and say "see, orange man BAD!", but I'd like to think you are a little smarter than that. Throw me a bone. Explain the link.



If there was obstruction, then Trump was acting guiltily about the allegations under investigation - of conspiring with an enemy state, granting them control over the outcomes of the processes of government of the US.


You know, from my perspective he was acting pissed off. What exactly is the criteria for "acting guiltily"?


They do stupid stuff like trying to stop investigations that will expose their guilt and incriminate them.


Oh, I get it now thanks. By the way, have you stopped beating your wife? Just askin'


Nah, I can't stop.





I never started.
By the way, feel free to investigate by speaking to my wife and children. I am confident of my innocence of the accusation. See how that works. How did Trump respond?


Read all about it, chronaut can't stop beating his wife!

See, I'm the liberal MSM and I don't like you. I read your whole statement but I only need the first sentence, I'll bury the rest somewhere in the back pages if I mention it at all.
I'd imagine after we repeat this cycle a few hundred times you'd be pretty pissed.

See how that works?



posted on May, 9 2019 @ 07:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: chr0naut

wow, so you used all those words to say you don't have a clue how things work in the US. Can't say I'm surprised. When your nation can be persuaded by a lunatic who says he wants to remove your guns, kills some folks, and you comply, you are a special kind of something. And it's not smart.


See what I mean. What "news" service did you get that bit of garbage from?


edit on 9/5/2019 by chr0naut because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 9 2019 @ 07:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: underpass61

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: underpass61

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: underpass61

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: network dude

I'll just post this here:

STATEMENT BY FORMER FEDERAL PROSECUTORS

At the time I posted this link, there were 735 DOJ Alumni who have put their signatures to this petition.


I am usually good at finding the clue in things like this, but I honestly can't find the link between what the OP is about and your post. It looks like some insanely weak attempt to point at Trump and say "see, orange man BAD!", but I'd like to think you are a little smarter than that. Throw me a bone. Explain the link.



If there was obstruction, then Trump was acting guiltily about the allegations under investigation - of conspiring with an enemy state, granting them control over the outcomes of the processes of government of the US.


You know, from my perspective he was acting pissed off. What exactly is the criteria for "acting guiltily"?


They do stupid stuff like trying to stop investigations that will expose their guilt and incriminate them.


Oh, I get it now thanks. By the way, have you stopped beating your wife? Just askin'


Nah, I can't stop.





I never started.
By the way, feel free to investigate by speaking to my wife and children. I am confident of my innocence of the accusation. See how that works. How did Trump respond?


Read all about it, chronaut can't stop beating his wife!

See, I'm the liberal MSM and I don't like you. I read your whole statement but I only need the first sentence, I'll bury the rest somewhere in the back pages if I mention it at all.
I'd imagine after we repeat this cycle a few hundred times you'd be pretty pissed.

See how that works?


Nope, I can't stop beating my wife at all. Totally incapable of it.

But, I do doubt that you are the liberal MSM.



Anyone can take things out of context, wrap it in opinion and broadcast tripe. What is telling is the lack of street smarts on behalf of some who assume that the headlines are true.

Consider when Mueller released his report and Trump tweeted "no collusion, no obstruction!", when the report said no such thing.

Makes you wonder if Trump had even read the report, and look at all those here on ATS parroting the nonsense ever since.

edit on 9/5/2019 by chr0naut because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 9 2019 @ 07:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: ThirdEyeofHorus
The walkaway movement so far is taking away roughly 400,000 voters with them. Saw a guy in interview with Levin ... die hard Dem now says he’s more conservative than he ever knew. He felt totally disillusioned when he saw for himself that the liberal media had lied.


Makes you wonder how much they paid.




posted on May, 9 2019 @ 07:48 PM
link   
Doesn't DJT follow the scripts they write for him?
Maybe the last minute China trade talks will postpone the midnight tariffs and we see a global stock market rally Friday?



posted on May, 9 2019 @ 10:22 PM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

Well beating your wife must give you lots of free time to meddle in American politics, get a job that pays better then maybe you won't have to beat your unsatisfied wife.

Or meddle in American politics.



posted on May, 9 2019 @ 11:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: thedigirati
a reply to: chr0naut

Well beating your wife must give you lots of free time to meddle in American politics, get a job that pays better then maybe you won't have to beat your unsatisfied wife.

Or meddle in American politics.


But I don't beat my wife.

I can't stop because I never started.



posted on May, 10 2019 @ 11:50 AM
link   
Those same 57% scoff at the idea of God. They say there is no proof of God. There is no proof Trump did anything but they "believe, have faith or just know that crimes exist somewhere."

Muller had two years but found nothing.. Democrats sure do have their fairy tales...




top topics



 
48
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join