It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: network dude
I'll just post this here:
STATEMENT BY FORMER FEDERAL PROSECUTORS
At the time I posted this link, there were 735 DOJ Alumni who have put their signatures to this petition.
originally posted by: Lumenari
a reply to: network dude
What did you expect, to be honest?
They watch CNN, MSNBC. They read the New York Times and get thier internet news from Yahoo.
If that is where you get your news from, there is still the possibility of Trump/Russia collusion, Trump has repeatedly obstructed justice and Barr is covering up crimes for Trump.
It's a whole different world completely divorced from reality.
About as divorced from reality as the Democratic party is from the majority of middle-class America.
It's OK.... I suspect this is all coming to a head soon.
C'mon Declass...
originally posted by: Quantumgamer1776
Who cares?
These are people who think killing an already born child is a “woman’s rights issue” and that men can become women, then compete against women in sports, and that those people crushing women’s sports records should be celebrated for being brave.
They are delusional about so much why would anyone bother quantifying any of it.
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: network dude
I'll just post this here:
STATEMENT BY FORMER FEDERAL PROSECUTORS
At the time I posted this link, there were 735 DOJ Alumni who have put their signatures to this petition.
Americans are good at popping pills.
About 46 percent of the U.S. population used one or more prescription drugs in the past 30 days, according to a survey from the National Center for Health Statistics. With almost half the U.S. population taking drugs, it may be surprising that this figure is a slight improvement from 10 years prior......
Both young and middle-aged adults used antidepressants the most frequently in the past 30 days. One in nine adults, 20 to 59 years old, has an antidepressants prescription.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: network dude
But you dont believe in polls.
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: network dude
I'll just post this here:
STATEMENT BY FORMER FEDERAL PROSECUTORS
At the time I posted this link, there were 735 DOJ Alumni who have put their signatures to this petition.
I am usually good at finding the clue in things like this, but I honestly can't find the link between what the OP is about and your post. It looks like some insanely weak attempt to point at Trump and say "see, orange man BAD!", but I'd like to think you are a little smarter than that. Throw me a bone. Explain the link.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: network dude
I'll just post this here:
STATEMENT BY FORMER FEDERAL PROSECUTORS
At the time I posted this link, there were 735 DOJ Alumni who have put their signatures to this petition.
I am usually good at finding the clue in things like this, but I honestly can't find the link between what the OP is about and your post. It looks like some insanely weak attempt to point at Trump and say "see, orange man BAD!", but I'd like to think you are a little smarter than that. Throw me a bone. Explain the link.
If there was obstruction, then Trump was acting guiltily about the allegations under investigation - of conspiring with an enemy state, granting them control over the outcomes of the processes of government of the US.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: network dude
I'll just post this here:
STATEMENT BY FORMER FEDERAL PROSECUTORS
At the time I posted this link, there were 735 DOJ Alumni who have put their signatures to this petition.
I am usually good at finding the clue in things like this, but I honestly can't find the link between what the OP is about and your post. It looks like some insanely weak attempt to point at Trump and say "see, orange man BAD!", but I'd like to think you are a little smarter than that. Throw me a bone. Explain the link.
The line of reasoning goes like this:
There is some evidence that may suggest that Trump tried to stop an investigation. His alleged attempts were through various means and repeated. The Mueller report identifies 10 instances.
The Mueller report says that, in regard to conspiracy charges, there was insufficient evidence to prosecute, that there had been efforts to destroy or hide some of the evidence and that it is possible that new evidence may come to light that changes the situation. This obviously does not clear anyone of those charges as some have claimed.
The obstruction of justice is not itself treason. However, the investigation was into potential conspiracy between the Trump campaign and an enemy foreign state.
If there was obstruction, then there must have been a motive behind it. The most likely motive in this particular case was that Trump was trying to protect himself from being discovered and prosecuted.
If there was obstruction, then Trump was acting guiltily about the allegations under investigation - of conspiring with an enemy state, granting them control over the outcomes of the processes of government of the US.
originally posted by: Justoneman
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: network dude
I'll just post this here:
STATEMENT BY FORMER FEDERAL PROSECUTORS
At the time I posted this link, there were 735 DOJ Alumni who have put their signatures to this petition.
As Aerosmith sings DREAM ON!
We don't buy their BS anymore. You know that but keep working for the Bastards.
Paid shills for the DNC lost their standing with Americans. PERIOD.
The DNC and the RINO's have gamed our system. We ARE taking it back. DJT has given the US step one and Swamp Draining has begun in earnest.
originally posted by: underpass61
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: network dude
I'll just post this here:
STATEMENT BY FORMER FEDERAL PROSECUTORS
At the time I posted this link, there were 735 DOJ Alumni who have put their signatures to this petition.
I am usually good at finding the clue in things like this, but I honestly can't find the link between what the OP is about and your post. It looks like some insanely weak attempt to point at Trump and say "see, orange man BAD!", but I'd like to think you are a little smarter than that. Throw me a bone. Explain the link.
If there was obstruction, then Trump was acting guiltily about the allegations under investigation - of conspiring with an enemy state, granting them control over the outcomes of the processes of government of the US.
You know, from my perspective he was acting pissed off. What exactly is the criteria for "acting guiltily"?
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: Justoneman
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: network dude
I'll just post this here:
STATEMENT BY FORMER FEDERAL PROSECUTORS
At the time I posted this link, there were 735 DOJ Alumni who have put their signatures to this petition.
As Aerosmith sings DREAM ON!
We don't buy their BS anymore. You know that but keep working for the Bastards.
Paid shills for the DNC lost their standing with Americans. PERIOD.
The DNC and the RINO's have gamed our system. We ARE taking it back. DJT has given the US step one and Swamp Draining has begun in earnest.
I would love to get paid for my opinion. Whom do I contact to give my details?
Ah yes, it is Trump that is the only honest one, not all these hundreds of prosecutors.
The casino owner, with two soviet wives, the reality TV 'personality' (why would a billionaire do that for 14 seasons? Wouldn't he make more money by concentrating on his business ventures?), who lies openly and repeatedly and contradicts himself, who made several attempts to obstruct the course of justice, with multiple ongoing court cases against him and a past history of many cases which he lost, who will not reveal his tax records, who we know has paid for prostitutes, who throws his closest associates under the bus to protect himself, who held a penthouse room booked for Bin Laden (until the money stopped)...
A paragon of virtue.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: underpass61
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: network dude
I'll just post this here:
STATEMENT BY FORMER FEDERAL PROSECUTORS
At the time I posted this link, there were 735 DOJ Alumni who have put their signatures to this petition.
I am usually good at finding the clue in things like this, but I honestly can't find the link between what the OP is about and your post. It looks like some insanely weak attempt to point at Trump and say "see, orange man BAD!", but I'd like to think you are a little smarter than that. Throw me a bone. Explain the link.
If there was obstruction, then Trump was acting guiltily about the allegations under investigation - of conspiring with an enemy state, granting them control over the outcomes of the processes of government of the US.
You know, from my perspective he was acting pissed off. What exactly is the criteria for "acting guiltily"?
You do stupid stuff like trying to stop investigations that will expose your guilt and incriminate you.
originally posted by: Krakatoa
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: network dude
I'll just post this here:
STATEMENT BY FORMER FEDERAL PROSECUTORS
At the time I posted this link, there were 735 DOJ Alumni who have put their signatures to this petition.
I am usually good at finding the clue in things like this, but I honestly can't find the link between what the OP is about and your post. It looks like some insanely weak attempt to point at Trump and say "see, orange man BAD!", but I'd like to think you are a little smarter than that. Throw me a bone. Explain the link.
The line of reasoning goes like this:
There is some evidence that may suggest that Trump tried to stop an investigation. His alleged attempts were through various means and repeated. The Mueller report identifies 10 instances.
The Mueller report says that, in regard to conspiracy charges, there was insufficient evidence to prosecute, that there had been efforts to destroy or hide some of the evidence and that it is possible that new evidence may come to light that changes the situation. This obviously does not clear anyone of those charges as some have claimed.
The obstruction of justice is not itself treason. However, the investigation was into potential conspiracy between the Trump campaign and an enemy foreign state.
If there was obstruction, then there must have been a motive behind it. The most likely motive in this particular case was that Trump was trying to protect himself from being discovered and prosecuted.
If there was obstruction, then Trump was acting guiltily about the allegations under investigation - of conspiring with an enemy state, granting them control over the outcomes of the processes of government of the US.
Let's see this shoe placed upon a different foot, and determine if the reasoning is sound, shall we?
The line of reasoning goes like this:
There is some evidence that may suggest that Hillary tried to stop an investigation. Her alleged attempts were through various means and repeated. The Comey report identifies various instances.
The Comey report says that, in regard to conspiracy charges, there was insufficient evidence to prosecute, that there had been efforts to destroy or hide some of the evidence and that it is possible that new evidence may come to light that changes the situation. This obviously does not clear anyone of those charges as some have claimed.
The obstruction of justice is not itself treason. However, the investigation was into potential conspiracy between the Hillary entourage and an enemy foreign state.
If there was obstruction, then there must have been a motive behind it. The most likely motive in this particular case was that Hillary was trying to protect herself from being discovered and prosecuted.
If there was obstruction, then Hillary was acting guiltily about the allegations underinvestigationthe matter - of conspiring with an enemy state, recklessly granting them control over the confidential information on her private email server that was not under the control of the secure processes of government of the US.
Now, is Hillary Guilty or innocent? Whatever you decide, MUST also apply to president Trump.