Huge Conflict of Interests for the Congressman Jerry Nadler !!!

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Lumenari

That one, I suspect, is interested less in what an actual ethics vilation is, and more in slagging the usa.

Actual freedom scares it.

Or some meme...

Perhaps you could explain why you believe the chair of the Senate Judicial Committee wishing to question the Attorney General over inconsistency in his testimony is somehow illegal or unethical.

Perhaps you should talk about Nadler's ethics violation, since that is the subject.

Or save all of us on ATS a lot of time and just copy/paste "Orange Man Bad" as your next 100 replies, since that's all your posts boil down to.

What was Nadler's ethics violation?

Is he not allowed to question the AG?

Surely that is the prerogative and purpose of a Commission focusing on the actions of the Judiciary, of which the AG stands as figurehead?

Do you think there should be people who are above the law and Constitution?

And if you don't, then how do think we could ensure rule of Constitutional law unless we challenge the authority of those at the top?

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: XCrycek

So let me understand this..... trump is bad but you are defending the jackass who wont pay his cab fares in dc?

I'm just saying that Trump isn't some ethical law abiding unicorn you guys want him him to be.
Do you know what those lawsuits mentioned in the OP are about?

a reply to: Lumenari

a big incestuous intertwined mess, as far as family members and political interests go.

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: chr0naut

uh what?➿

Quick, post a picture of smoke. Or a cheesy 1950's pop tune.

OK, but it was mis-titled. It is clearly "The Last Republican who didn't make me a sammich".

a reply to: XCrycek

So you just stopped by to say orange man bad.
No worries.
Thanks.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: XCrycek

So you just stopped by to say orange man bad.
No worries.
Thanks.

I'm just wondering what thosee lawsuits were about. But I guess I won't get the answer here.
Orange man bad, that's a cute meme.

a reply to: XCrycek

They're all "oy vey" and "politisch" 😎

a reply to: xuenchen

Nadler should recuse from investigating Trump and Biden should recuse from the President's race, for similar family-related reasons.

a reply to: XCrycek

You could read the op link?
I am not going to summarize it for you.

Wont read it but trump is bad.
Thats rich.

Can you provide a source for the lawsuits you cited, most importantly including information on the specific parties and circumstances which prompted the lawsuit? As for your consclusion that Trump has no respect for the law, which laws did he break? If that were the case wouldn’t he be prosecuted in a criminal court prior to his inauguration instead of being sued in a civil court? I’m just trying to understand your logic. And anybody can file a lawsuit. It’s not uncommon for construction contractors to sue and be sued. If I file a lawsuit against you for money, does that definitively prove or even suggest that you have contempt for the law? Your argument is an example of extremely poor logic and contains multiple fallacies, the likes of which I’ve rarely heard. In a way, it’s kind of impressive. It’s still technically a free country and people can dislike anybody for any reason but try to be a little more intellectually honest for the sake of productive political discourse. a reply to: XCrycek

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: xuenchen

Surely someone in the opposition party, who is opposing the party that Trump is leading, has no conflict of interest in following the dictates of his party?

You are suggesting that no-one should ever oppose their opposition.

Part of the "poor little picked on Trump" campaign, I suppose?

I mean, get real, he's the POTUS, you can't get much more status or power than that yet he's all 'witch hunt' and "This is the end of my presidency. I’m f****d!".

Perhaps Trump and co should 'man up'?

spread lies as often as you can. When you piss away your integrity, being that guy just comes natural. at least you are consistent.

originally posted by: XCrycek

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: XCrycek

So let me understand this..... trump is bad but you are defending the jackass who wont pay his cab fares in dc?

I'm just saying that Trump isn't some ethical law abiding unicorn you guys want him him to be.
Do you know what those lawsuits mentioned in the OP are about?

We know they failed and that tells you what? Nothing I am sure since you don't seem to be able observe facts like one other in here with us.

originally posted by: XCrycek

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: XCrycek

So you just stopped by to say orange man bad.
No worries.
Thanks.

I'm just wondering what thosee lawsuits were about. But I guess I won't get the answer here.
Orange man bad, that's a cute meme.

All the answers you're looking for are here. Link

It's even a liberal source.

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: xuenchen

These people have no integrity.
They have no respect for the law.

You could bribe him for sandwichs tho I hear.

He's gotten better, actually.

I remember when he looked like Jabba the Hut.

Guess he got a surgery, lost weight and now looks like a fat goblin.

Money can't buy everything...

That's funny, I was thinking it kind of looked like rabid bat. The pointy ears really did it for me.

Cheers - Dave

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: highvein
a reply to: chr0naut

Perhaps Trump and co should 'man up'?

Why? They would just try to impeach him for not being gender neutral.

The funny part, at least to me, about my statement is that it describes the Democrat mindset perfectly at this point.

That isn't an impeachable offense. But it is a funny comeback! Star for that one.

Neither is Collusion, but that didn't stop them.

originally posted by: provocateur

a reply to: Lumenari

a big incestuous intertwined mess, as far as family members and political interests go.

That deserves a thread of it's own.

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: xuenchen

Surely someone in the opposition party, who is opposing the party that Trump is leading, has no conflict of interest in following the dictates of his party?

You are suggesting that no-one should ever oppose their opposition.

Part of the "poor little picked on Trump" campaign, I suppose?

I mean, get real, he's the POTUS, you can't get much more status or power than that yet he's all 'witch hunt' and "This is the end of my presidency. I’m f****d!".

Perhaps Trump and co should 'man up'?

spread lies as often as you can. When you piss away your integrity, being that guy just comes natural. at least you are consistent.

Consistent reasonable and critical.

How many of these "Bombshell"s and "This is huge" pieces of empty allegation does Faux News and co. come out with every week?

Perhaps go and look at your posting history. Have any of them actually played out as suggested? Nope, all still in the 'allegation unfounded' category.

Will the penny drop soon?

originally posted by: highvein

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: highvein
a reply to: chr0naut

Perhaps Trump and co should 'man up'?

Why? They would just try to impeach him for not being gender neutral.

The funny part, at least to me, about my statement is that it describes the Democrat mindset perfectly at this point.

That isn't an impeachable offense. But it is a funny comeback! Star for that one.

Neither is Collusion, but that didn't stop them.

Trump was the one who introduced the term (or perhaps it was his pet AG?). Then the Faux news took it and ran. Mueller has tried to explain that it was never a charge, but the idiocracy cannot conceive that. Definitely the sycophants parrot their crush.

originally posted by: Middleoftheroad

originally posted by: XCrycek

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: XCrycek

So you just stopped by to say orange man bad.
No worries.
Thanks.

I'm just wondering what thosee lawsuits were about. But I guess I won't get the answer here.
Orange man bad, that's a cute meme.

All the answers you're looking for are here. Link

It's even a liberal source.

So you want me to Google? Is this like when you ask for something in the Q thread and they tell you to read through tens of thousands of pages of horsecrap

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: XCrycek

You could read the op link?
I am not going to summarize it for you.

Wont read it but trump is bad.
Thats rich.

Nah, I don't want to fall for clickbait and give money to starpolitical or whatever the bs site in the OP is called.

a reply to: chr0naut

Trump was the one who introduced the term (or perhaps it was his pet AG?).

uh nope
wrong again
but keep on making up easily verified facts
just exposes how easily and conveniently you lie

thehill.com...
Anti-Trump group files FBI complaint over alleged Russian collusion

A Democratic group has filed a complaint with the FBI alleging that Donald Trump's campaign and his ally Roger Stone have been colluding with the Russian government to hack American computers and manipulate the U.S. election.

It was a dnc group that used that.
From one of the dnc's talking points in October of 16.


nice try tho