Huge Conflict of Interests for the Congressman Jerry Nadler !!!

U.S. Congressman Jerry Nadler is the Chairman of the House Judicial Committee.

He was snubbed off by Attorney General William Barr the other day which soon evolved into the now famous Chicken Dinner farce by Congressman Steve Cohen.

Nadler has been a Trump hater since long before Trump was even President.

Now we have Nadler's own Son (another lawyer) working for a firm in NY that apparently made several lawsuits against Trump and the Organization.

Jim Acosta (Mr CNN) is also involved with this law firm against Trump.

Big conflicts of interest like these demand RECUSAL !!!

😆

Nadler’s Son’s Connection To Jim Acosta Looks To Be Major ETHICS Violation


The man leading the congressional attack on President Trump, Congressman Jerry Nadler looks to have a major conflict on his hands which screams ethics violation.

Michael Nadler, works for Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP, a New York based law firm.

What is significant about this job is that that office has repeatedly sued President Trump, including on behalf of CNN reporter Jim Acosta

😆

a reply to: xuenchen

These people have no integrity.
They have no respect for the law.

You could bribe him for sandwichs tho I hear.

a reply to: xuenchen

The MSM and the Democratic party are a big incestuous intertwined mess, as far as family members and political interests go.

It's no wonder that they are basically the PR arm of the Democratic party now.

I DID miss this connection though!

Going to be interesting to see how Nadless responds to this...

Even more interesting to see what Trump's tweet about it will be.

Buhahahaha

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: xuenchen

These people have no integrity.
They have no respect for the law.

You could bribe him for sandwichs tho I hear.

He's gotten better, actually.

I remember when he looked like Jabba the Hut.

Guess he got a surgery, lost weight and now looks like a fat goblin.

Money can't buy everything...

He is violating the rules of ethics of the House of Representative, he should be immediately removed from his position. He also is pretty much involved with CNN, if there are any leaks, he should be suspected. Now the case against Trump, maybe they should look into where information used to make the charges came from, was this information leaked or supplied by this congressman?

I'm reminded of a "rat king"...

The entire bunch of them have been in the same sewer pipe, for so long...

a reply to: xuenchen

Surely someone in the opposition party, who is opposing the party that Trump is leading, has no conflict of interest in following the dictates of his party?

You are suggesting that no-one should ever oppose their opposition.

Part of the "poor little picked on Trump" campaign, I suppose?

I mean, get real, he's the POTUS, you can't get much more status or power than that yet he's all 'witch hunt' and "This is the end of my presidency. I’m f****d!".

Perhaps Trump and co should 'man up'?

a reply to: chr0naut

Perhaps Trump and co should 'man up'?

Why? They would just try to impeach him for not being gender neutral.

The funny part, at least to me, about my statement is that it describes the Democrat mindset perfectly at this point.

a reply to: chr0naut

Perhaps you should read up more on American politics so you can understand what an "Ethics Violation" means.

Although your confusion is perfectly understandable... I don't know anyone on the left that understands the concept of an "ethics violation" when it comes to their own party.

a reply to: Lumenari

That one, I suspect, is interested less in what an actual ethics vilation is, and more in slagging the usa.

Actual freedom scares it.

a reply to: chr0naut

uh what?➿

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Lumenari

That one, I suspect, is interested less in what an actual ethics vilation is, and more in slagging the usa.

Actual freedom scares it.

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: chr0naut

uh what?➿

Quick, post a picture of smoke. Or a cheesy 1950's pop tune.

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Lumenari

That one, I suspect, is interested less in what an actual ethics vilation is, and more in slagging the usa.

Actual freedom scares it.

Or some meme...



Perhaps you could explain why you believe the chair of the Senate Judicial Committee wishing to question the Attorney General over inconsistency in his testimony is somehow illegal or unethical.

originally posted by: highvein
a reply to: chr0naut

Perhaps Trump and co should 'man up'?

Why? They would just try to impeach him for not being gender neutral.

The funny part, at least to me, about my statement is that it describes the Democrat mindset perfectly at this point.

That isn't an impeachable offense. But it is a funny comeback! Star for that one.

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Lumenari

That one, I suspect, is interested less in what an actual ethics vilation is, and more in slagging the usa.

Actual freedom scares it.

Or some meme...

Perhaps you could explain why you believe the chair of the Senate Judicial Committee wishing to question the Attorney General over inconsistency in his testimony is somehow illegal or unethical.

Perhaps you should talk about Nadler's ethics violation, since that is the subject.

Or save all of us on ATS a lot of time and just copy/paste "Orange Man Bad" as your next 100 replies, since that's all your posts boil down to.

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Lumenari

That one, I suspect, is interested less in what an actual ethics vilation is, and more in slagging the usa.

Actual freedom scares it.

Or some meme...

Perhaps you could explain why you believe the chair of the Senate Judicial Committee wishing to question the Attorney General over inconsistency in his testimony is somehow illegal or unethical.

Perhaps you should talk about Nadler's ethics violation, since that is the subject.

Or save all of us on ATS a lot of time and just copy/paste "Orange Man Bad" as your next 100 replies, since that's all your posts boil down to.

Orson Lannister...

"Guh, guh, guh..!"

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: chr0naut

uh what?➿

Quick, post a picture of smoke. Or a cheesy 1950's pop tune.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: xuenchen

These people have no integrity.
They have no respect for the law.

You could bribe him for sandwichs tho I hear.

LOL. So let me understand this.
A law firm made several lawsuits against Trump yet here you are claiming how it's everyone else but Trump who have no respect for the law

Do you know what those lawsuits were about?
On other hand Trump is known for being dirty when doing business with other people.
He has refused to pay his contractors several times.
But yeah... Poor Trump derp derp derrrp

a reply to: XCrycek

So let me understand this..... trump is bad but you are defending the jackass who wont pay his cab fares in dc?