Responding to a poster about climate change with a few shots of an excellent tequila in me I had a thought.
Now to me, the climate change hoax has always been about global wealth redistribution.
I think that way because they have admitted it.
the words of former United Nations climate official Ottmar Edenhofer:
"One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with the
environmental policy anymore, with problems such as deforestation or the ozone hole," said Edenhofer, who co-chaired the U.N.'s
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change working group on Mitigation of Climate Change from 2008 to 2015.
So what is the goal of environmental policy?
"We redistribute de facto the world's wealth by climate policy," said Edenhofer.
For those who want to believe that maybe Edenhofer just misspoke and doesn't really mean that, consider that a little more than five years ago he
also said that "the next world climate summit in Cancun is actually an economy summit during which the distribution of the world's resources will
Now for us in the good old US of A, we are also dealing with the New Green Deal… a climate change initiative that has a conservative price tag of
about 100 trillion dollars and HAS to get done in 12 years.
Or less… Benito O’Rourke has taken that number down to 10 years.
So with that said, here is my thought….
What if the New Green Deal is just a bailout for Progressive states and cities that are collapsing under the weight of their own policies?
I mean, let's say Progressives take over, pass the deal and we taxpayers are on the hook for 100 trillion.
How is that money doled out?
I would assume that since it would be Federal monies that they would be allocated to states by population size, or towns by population size.
Which means the lion’s share of said monies would go to… liberal states and cities.
Is this a way for them to prop up their economic disasters?
Is that why all of a sudden we have changed the goalposts from, say, 30 years in the future (where the part where we are all going to die is usually
pegged at) to a closer date?
California is in the red and will be toast in about a decade.
The same with New York, Chicago, etc.
I am wondering if their eventual collapse, the promise of new funding and the possibility of them using it to prop up the system for just a little
longer isn’t an actual motive.
Share some thoughts! What do you think?
And on this day, please binge responsibly!!!