It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: fleabit
That I'm sorry to say, is hilarious. We are basically at the amoeba stage as far as technology goes.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
originally posted by: putnam6
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: Zcustosmorum
Given the scale of the Universe I'd find it more terrifying being alone than not TBH , that would just be the craziest quirk of the Universe ever.
That would mean we aren't anything but a fluke form of a bacterium, where the absolute right conditions, heat, water nutrients must exist in a certain ratio, for us to evolve.
Or, it could mean that life develops under whatever conditions are available.
originally posted by: fleabit
...We are basically at the amoeba stage as far as technology goes.
originally posted by: Soylent Green Is People
That all depends on how long an average technological civilization lasts. Our civilization has been around for about 30,000 to 50,000 years, depending on how you define when our civilization started. Our human species of "Home sapiens" has been around for about 225,000 years.
Seriously, I can't even find a quarter when I lose it in the couch, and we're supposed to find alien life in a galaxy far away within the few years that we've had almost capable technology? Riiiight.
originally posted by: looneylupinsrevenge
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
originally posted by: gallop
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: Zcustosmorum
Given the scale of the Universe I'd find it more terrifying being alone than not TBH , that would just be the craziest quirk of the Universe ever.
There is no possible chance that we are alone. None.
Yes, yes there is. And furthermore, it's almost a certainty. However, in order to understand, you first have to define "we" and "alone". If you are in the middle of the Indian Ocean, by yourself, on a sinking sailboat, are you alone? When you say "we", do you mean an entity with two arms, two legs a torso and a head? Does an entity with no physical form at all count as "we"?
It stands to reason that there are other planets so well ready for life to exist. One in infinity? Impossible.
That we even exist, proves that probability.
No, it only proves we exist in a physical form on planet Earth at a certain point in time.
I know I know, there is a secret algorithm that they use to denounce the concept.. well not secret, but still.. may as well be. Drake may as well be a broken record.
It's not secret. It's quite simple really. If ET exists we would have discovered him by now. Does this mean ET doesn't exist? No, but if he does we don't recognize him and very likely never will.
But will we ever meet our distant neighbours? Will we even ever speak face to face to someone across this globe?
Almost certainly not. (with a probability of about 99.999%)
I believe there are countless planets, filled with rich cultures and species, vastly different to what we know. a plethora of life forms, existing, wondering the same...
Countless planets, yes. Filled with rich cultures and species, debatable. Vastly different to what we know, absolutely. A plethora of life forms, define "life form". Existing, wondering the same..., highly unlikely.
Is there anything like us, out there.
No.
Sorry but I'm calling complete bullsnip on your above post. There is far to many systems let alone planets out there for us to be the only sentient life in existence, plain and simple. Years ago I had very same debate with another poster on this site, if you break it down even in our own galaxy there should be 1000+ sentient life forms in existence. Now take that to the next step and apply it to the Trillions upon Trillions (I repeat TRILLIONS) of galaxies out there and any argument against it simply falls apart.
As to the thought that we should have found them by now, again complete bullsnip! The farthest our radio signals have traveled is only about 100 light years, and at that distance it would be near impossible to discern them from the background radiation. Plus, in order for them to receive and return a transmission they would have to be on the same technological plane we are. If they instead developed quantum entanglement before radio waves, or some yet unknown form of communication then they may never even notice our signals. It is our over inflated ego's and limited thought processes that prevent us from seeing that possibility. We are used to being number 1, on our planet, so it's hard for us to accept that there could be others who are far more advanced or whose thinking is so vastly different to ours that we would go without notice.
originally posted by: gortex
That's 265,000 Galaxies and billions of years in one picture...
originally posted by: Soylent Green Is People
Maybe spreading through the galaxy is so difficult to be practically impossible.
originally posted by: 1point92AU
And there are people who truly believe Earth is the only planet with intelligent life. It is this one thought that boggles my mind the most. How could any semi-rational person not look at that picture and theoretically "see" the endless multitude of other already inhabited planets?
Bottom line...does ET exist? Probably, but not in a way mankind is ever going to understand.
originally posted by: Zcustosmorum
On the flip side however, using the same hypothesis, there's still a good chance that some forms of ET could be like us in many ways we could understand.
originally posted by: TOMFROMOZ
Perspective can be absolutely mind obliterating!!
If the Moon Were Only 1 Pixel