It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

What Will History Books Say About The Democrats in Power from 2009 thru Today?.

page: 4
34
<< 1  2  3    5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 6 2019 @ 11:46 AM
link   
a reply to: StoutBroux

But the party's flipped! (they didn't)




posted on May, 6 2019 @ 11:52 AM
link   
a reply to: underwerks

LOL, I can't figure out how you guys view it this way.

What have the democrats shied away from doing that makes you feel they're spineless? If anything, it's the other way around. Republicans minus trump are all spineless cowards and it's the baby killing dems who have no soul.



posted on May, 6 2019 @ 12:57 PM
link   
a reply to: Dfairlite

So if the dems are the party of the confederacy and slavery, why is it only conservative Republicans flying confederate flags and fighting to protect confederate monuments..


This is one of those narratives that makes me think people are trolling..

Who would ever believe the democrats are the super secret confederates when it is the GOP publicity flying the stars and bars and such..



posted on May, 6 2019 @ 01:48 PM
link   
a reply to: JustJohnny

Do you really think this is a good point? People in the south (the old confederacy) fly the confederate flag, and because they fly the confederate flag, they're pro-slavery and racism? Furthermore, do you think southern democrats (even though they're outnumbered by republicans) don't also fly the confederate flag? Is it only southern republicans who want to preserve historical statues?

You're conflating the meaning of the confederate flag to these people. I'll tell you what, go up to every truck you see that has the confederate flag on it and ask them if they think the US should bring back slavery. If you can find a significant number of these people who tell you yes, then I'll rethink my position. But having lived in the south for quite some time I can tell you why they actually fly that flag and it's simple; heritage and freedom. Much like people hold reverence for the boston tea party, many southerners hold reverence for their history. The good and the bad. Most southerners separate slavery from the civil war (which they call the war of northern aggression). So to them the confederate flag has little to do with slavery and a lot to do with the independence of the states.

As for the statues, it's quite similar. They don't believe in erasing history. Even if it isn't perfect. Take a look at the coliseum, should it be demolished? After-all, much evil was done there. Racism was rampant. The people killed were slaves. They were killed for entertainment. There is hardly a place in the south that could hold a candle to the evil that took place within those walls.

Remember when the left used to respect the duality of man? Lol. Now it's angels (in the sense of what they think is currently right) or death. There's no beauty in the human struggle, to those on the left, and nothing to be learned from 'wrong' (at least as much as they'll admit wrong exists). It's really sad how hollowed out and empty they've become.
edit on 6-5-2019 by Dfairlite because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 6 2019 @ 02:00 PM
link   
Chalk another one up against Democrats.

Indictment unsealed against Hillary Clinton's campaign chairman Joel Davis today.

mobile.twitter.com...



posted on May, 6 2019 @ 02:59 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

If pizzagate turns out to be real, I'm gonna puke.



posted on May, 6 2019 @ 03:55 PM
link   
History will detail how the Democrats willfully changed from a Loyal Opposition Party when out-of-power into a destructive force bent on imposing their worldview on all the population at-any-cost...


the Democrats are an 'Avowed' Insurgency instead of a part of the Constitution abiding Community



posted on May, 6 2019 @ 08:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: Dfairlite
a reply to: StoutBroux

But the party's flipped! (they didn't)


Democrats will also be viewed as murdering our unborn children, with no conscience or regrets.

New ATS Thread: www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on May, 6 2019 @ 08:06 PM
link   
a reply to: St Udio

Well said, and (sadly) very accurate, St Udio.



posted on May, 6 2019 @ 09:25 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

The books will say that an alarming amount of liberals lost their minds and as a result, drove the US to civil war. There will be reference videos of that psycho lib chick that threw chocolate milk on people she didn't agree with, and others screaming at the sky. TDS will be an official mental disease.
edit on 5/6/19 by Ameilia because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 6 2019 @ 09:31 PM
link   
a reply to: Ameilia

IMO Ameilia, the only way there would be a "civil war" is if Democrats gain enough power to start implementing their baby murder, 70% Tax Rates, etc.. Or implements what Cory Booker promised today, if he's elected President....Throw everyone in jail who doesn't give up their personal firearm.

As things stand now, Democrats are LOSING power, and will lose a lot more when Democrat leaders start being exposed by current ongoing investigations.



posted on May, 6 2019 @ 09:44 PM
link   
It also appears that when the FBI is run by a DEMOCRAT in the White House, that organization is rife with corruption and/or incompetence.

Just revealed: The FBI lost critical notes, and damaged data-disks, related to the 2015-2016 investigation of Hillary Clinton's National Security breaches.


In other words, China has over 30,000 of Hillary Clinton’s emails which include classified material.

Now the FBI reveals that a CD containing material about their meeting with the Inspector General is damaged and the notes about the meeting are also missing — The FBI is supposed to be our premiere law enforcement agency. Let that sink in.
More at: www.thegatewaypundit.com... rivate-server/



posted on May, 6 2019 @ 10:24 PM
link   
It's going to say..

"These worthless POS traitors tried to destroy America until Trump became President for a second, then third term. After him Vice President Mike Pence continued to become a two term President and his VP became President after. Thus securing American Freedom for a century and putting a much needed end to the Democrat predisposition."



posted on May, 6 2019 @ 10:32 PM
link   
a reply to: r0xor

After Donald Trump's 3rd term, America would most likely prefer IVANKA Trump. A beautiful, smart, woman President would be perfect for our affluence and national brand, come 2029.



posted on May, 6 2019 @ 10:45 PM
link   
3rd term?


How does that work?



posted on May, 7 2019 @ 04:37 AM
link   
a reply to: Dfairlite

Then why is it only conservative Republicans flying confederate flags and fighting tooth and nail to protect confederate monuments???


This really is too silly for anyone to actually believe..

That makes me think people are trolling..


“It isn’t the group of white supremacists chanting with tiki torches who are the racists... it is the democrats..”


Lmao



posted on May, 7 2019 @ 04:44 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Lmao...


Can you name one conservative position in American history that has proven long term to be true or objectively the correct way of doing things.. ??

Slavery?? Nope..

Segregation?? Nope

Prohibition?? Nope

Abortion? Nope.. you can say it will change one day (it won’t) but it for damn sure hasn’t today..

The second amendment meaning “no gun ownership shall be infringed “ when obviously there are gun restrictions..


I can not think of even one policy position where those trying to conserve the traditions of the past were right long term..



posted on May, 7 2019 @ 04:45 AM
link   
a reply to: Fallingdown

So at what point will it be obvious nothing is going to happen??

At that point will it mean trump and co were lying, or trump and co protects Obama/Hillary/exc??



posted on May, 7 2019 @ 04:47 AM
link   
a reply to: Dfairlite

All of that assumes the average American falls for the Fox News narrative..

They do not..

That is why the gop can not win a popular vote and have to rely on gerrymandering and such..

..the average American isn’t conservative..
edit on 7-5-2019 by JustJohnny because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 7 2019 @ 10:28 AM
link   
a reply to: JustJohnny

Lol, the fact that you used gerrymandering and popular vote as your arguments proves the ignorance of those who disdain fox. I don't watch fox. Haven't watched fox in probably 15 years other than the occasional youtube clips shared on social media. But I recognize the reason they have the highest ratings of all the primetime news networks. They provide a much more balanced product. Is there a right lean? Yep. Just like there is a left lean on ABC/NBC (which has turned more into a tilt as of late).



..the average American isn’t conservative..


You might want to check in on that again. Conservatives outnumber liberals 35% to 25%. Independents make up another 35%. Of those independents the split is similar 30% conservative, 23% liberal, 45% moderate. There is nothing moderate about todays democrat party nor the mainstream media (PR arm of the democrat party) narrative.

So conservatives and conservative independents make up about 46% of the population. compare that to the 34% of the country that is liberal.

So quite literally, yes the average american is conservative. Certainly there are far more conservatives than there are liberals.

The popular vote is absolutely meaningless. We don't live in a system where the popular vote has any determination on the outcome of elections. As such, no one is trying to capture it. If they were, you'd see republicans campaigning in new york and california much more often. But in the world we actually live in, the electoral college is what matters. So politicians go to ohio, wisconsin, pennsylvania, colorado, and the virginia's and carolina's.

Furthermore, if the popular vote mattered we'd get turnout well above the 60-70% we currently get.

As for gerrymandering, please explain what the proper makeup of a district is. How do you draw the lines? Is it 50/50, where nearly half the population will be disenfranchised by their representative, regardless? Is it 70/30? Is it purely geographic? Do you split metro areas among suburbs or group them together? When you guys can tell me what the perfect make up of a district is, I'll consider that gerrymandering is a problem. Until then, it's simply media programming you to explain how you were victimized by those dastardly conservatives that only make up 8% of the population, or something.
edit on 7-5-2019 by Dfairlite because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
34
<< 1  2  3    5  6 >>

log in

join