It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

White House lawyer blasted Mueller over obstruction decision

page: 2
40
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 3 2019 @ 10:21 PM
link   
a reply to: Zanti Misfit




On What EXACT Evidence


The evidence that Mueller outlined in the 11 cases of Trump's obstruction and attempts at obstruction in his report.


edit on 3-5-2019 by Sookiechacha because: (no reason given)




posted on May, 3 2019 @ 10:27 PM
link   
Q. What was the suspect trying to obstruct?

A. An illegal prosecution attempt of a crime that never existed.

The Dems had their shot. They failed. Trump’s turn.



posted on May, 3 2019 @ 10:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Zanti Misfit




On What EXACT Evidence


The evidence that Mueller outlined in 11 cases of Trump's obstruction and attempts at obstruction.


It wasn't evidence of obstruction, it was political hackery.

Otherwise he would have recommended impeachment to the legislative body.

But he didn't have any actual evidence that would hold up, so nutless Mueller punted the decision because he couldn't admit that he was an absolute failure at delivering the goods.

The left conveniently forgets that part.

It had nothing to do with indicting Trump... Mueller could have recommended impeachment proceedings.

It has to suck to be a lefty nowadays...

For what... 3 years now? you and yours have woke up every morning with a plan to win the 2016 election again.

Then Mueller blew your world up.

Now you are stuck... the horse has been beaten till it's no longer visible, no straws left to grasp but the ones you manufacture out of thin air....

Nothing left but sadness and the inevitability of Trump winning 2020.




edit on 3-5-2019 by Lumenari because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 3 2019 @ 10:34 PM
link   
Left had 3 years with no evidence and a lot of illegal surveillance and came up empty.

I’m pretty sure Barr/Horowitz won’t need/take that long with a mountain of real evidence.

Next 18 months will be fun.



posted on May, 3 2019 @ 10:35 PM
link   
a reply to: Lumenari




It wasn't evidence of obstruction, it was political hackery.


You need to brush up on your definitions. What Mueller presented was called evidence, plus he backed up his citations and narratives with recordings. emails, letters, transcripts, etc.,



Otherwise he would have recommended impeachment to the legislative body.


He pretty much did, when he said that it's the constitutional authority of Congress to address the president's corruption.



posted on May, 3 2019 @ 10:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: PilSungMtnMan
Left had 3 years with no evidence and a lot of illegal surveillance and came up empty.

I’m pretty sure Barr/Horowitz won’t need/take that long with a mountain of real evidence.

Next 18 months will be fun.


I have a feeling it's going to be a blast.

And the left can't wipe it now... you know, like with a cloth.




posted on May, 3 2019 @ 10:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Lumenari




It wasn't evidence of obstruction, it was political hackery.


You need to brush up on your definitions. What Mueller presented was called evidence, plus he backed up his citations and narratives with recordings. emails, letters, transcripts, etc.,



Otherwise he would have recommended impeachment to the legislative body.


He pretty much did, when he said that it's the constitutional authority of Congress to address the president's corruption.



You need to brush up on reality.

Among other things he brought up that soon after Trump joked about Russia getting Hillary's emails, Russians were trying to hack her server for the emails.

Her damn server was destroyed a year earlier.

He didn't use a lot of "facts" at all in his report... he leaned heavily on left-leaning articles from the MSM.

A WaPo article does not automatically represent a "fact".
edit on 3-5-2019 by Lumenari because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 3 2019 @ 10:47 PM
link   
Corruption? We’ve moved from collusion/treason to obstruction to corruption.

If the Mueller Report had actionable evidence;

1) Mueller would have recommended charges; he didn’t.

2) House would have initiated impeachment actions the next day; they didn’t.

If the Mueller Report cleared POTUS of collusion and didn’t find enough evidence of obstruction to file charges, the House is reduced to chickens and howling at the moon. Everyone stopped listening, just look at CNN/MSNBC ratings. Tanked.



posted on May, 3 2019 @ 10:49 PM
link   
a reply to: Lumenari

You're conflating "collusion" with obstruction of justice. There was plenty of evidence that Trump did and attempted to obstruct justice. Mueller couldn't indict Trump, because of the DOJ rule against indicting a sitting president. But, Mueller made it clear that the investigation and the report can't clear Trump of crimes, either.

Mueller kicked the issue to Congress, citing their constitutional authority to make the determination.


edit on 3-5-2019 by Sookiechacha because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 3 2019 @ 10:51 PM
link   
a reply to: PilSungMtnMan

Next Democrats will ask a law school to hold "mock trials" 😆



posted on May, 3 2019 @ 10:52 PM
link   
I actually see Mueller possibly getting into hot water over this.

He made a VERY stupid political move in doing this.



posted on May, 3 2019 @ 10:58 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

" The evidence that Mueller outlined in the 11 cases of Trump's obstruction and attempts at obstruction in his report. "




Some Factual Evidence , or Opinionated " Hearsay " ? The President's Lawyer Jay Sekulow would KNOW for Sure . ....Crickets .....



posted on May, 3 2019 @ 10:58 PM
link   
a reply to: Tempter




He made a VERY stupid political move in doing this.


What is "this"?



posted on May, 3 2019 @ 10:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Lumenari

You're conflating "collusion" with obstruction of justice. There was plenty of evidence that Trump did and attempted to obstruct justice. Mueller couldn't indict Trump, because of the DOJ rule against indicting a sitting president. But, Mueller made it clear that the investigation and the report can't clear Trump of crimes, either.

Mueller kicked the issue to Congress, citing their constitutional authority to make the determination.



You are conflating what Democratic donors want with reality.

Here is reality.

There was a teleconference with Democratic K Street multimillionaire lobbyists and donors the other morning.

They decided that although the Mueller report ended up giving them nothing, they still wanted to keep the narrative going until the 2020 elections because it is the only thing they have left to keep the base enraged and focused.

After the teleconference, they told their lackeys (you would call them the Democratic leadership) what they needed to do to keep getting paid.

The lackeys bowed, scurried off and got busy spreading the message to the base.

That's you.

Now here you are on ATS, enraged and focused on the issue.

Those multimillionaire donors are getting exactly what they want.

And they didn't have to pay YOU anything.




edit on 3-5-2019 by Lumenari because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 3 2019 @ 11:01 PM
link   
Obstruction of illegal investigation. That’s kind of funny. It’s less obstructing and more self defense.

Mueller failed.
Nancy is suffering mini strokes daily.
Nadler is single phasing.
AOC and her merry band are running the Left.

Wait until Trump gets his third SCOTUS appointment. That’s going to create China Syndrome within the Dems.



posted on May, 3 2019 @ 11:01 PM
link   
a reply to: Zanti Misfit

Who is claiming that the evidence outlined in Mueller's report is not factual.



posted on May, 3 2019 @ 11:02 PM
link   



posted on May, 3 2019 @ 11:03 PM
link   
a reply to: Lumenari

You're projecting Republican fear, fear that their orange god is compromised and vulnerable to impeachment.



posted on May, 3 2019 @ 11:06 PM
link   
There will be no impeachment. That ship sailed. Even if there were, it dies in the Senate. The Dems fumbled and now POTUS is on offense.



posted on May, 3 2019 @ 11:06 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

There's some pretty damning evidence in that link of yours.

Whip strips are thin too, but they can do a world of damage.



new topics

top topics



 
40
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join