It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: DBCowboy
Do you think it's that simple? No I dont think the employment numbers show any major change. Obama had 4.2 supposedly but was given 10 when he started...the Iraq mess and spending credit crunch we didn't seem to learn from happened.
So no not impressed until we stop spending more than we make as a society. Sorry. Guess I am old school.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: DBCowboy
Do you think it's that simple? No I dont think the employment numbers show any major change. Obama had 4.2 supposedly but was given 10 when he started...the Iraq mess and spending credit crunch we didn't seem to learn from happened.
So no not impressed until we stop spending more than we make as a society. Sorry. Guess I am old school.
Simple question.
Is more people working and earning money good or bad?
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: OccamsRazor04
Some of these Bill's passed during a Republican controlled Congress. Others were signed into law by a Republican president.
originally posted by: luthier
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: DBCowboy
Do you think it's that simple? No I dont think the employment numbers show any major change. Obama had 4.2 supposedly but was given 10 when he started...the Iraq mess and spending credit crunch we didn't seem to learn from happened.
So no not impressed until we stop spending more than we make as a society. Sorry. Guess I am old school.
Simple question.
Is more people working and earning money good or bad?
It's not simple doing what? Payed for by who? You mean like the Bernie job guarantee?
People are classified as unemployed if they meet all of the following criteria: they had no employment during the reference week; they were available for work at that time; and they made specific efforts to find employment sometime during the 4-week period ending with the reference week. Persons laid off from a job and expecting recall need not be looking for work to be counted as unemployed. The unemployment data derived from the household survey in no way depend upon the eligibility for or receipt of unemployment insurance benefits.
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: OccamsRazor04
No it matters that people who call themselves conservatives allow insane legislation like that to pass.
Otherwise who cares what name people call themselves. There is zero difference. Besides the Iraq debacle had a play in the crash.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: OccamsRazor04
No it matters that people who call themselves conservatives allow insane legislation like that to pass.
Otherwise who cares what name people call themselves. There is zero difference. Besides the Iraq debacle had a play in the crash.
Sorry I did not put Republicans on a pedestal, fact remains Democrats caused the crash.
originally posted by: luthier
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: OccamsRazor04
No it matters that people who call themselves conservatives allow insane legislation like that to pass.
Otherwise who cares what name people call themselves. There is zero difference. Besides the Iraq debacle had a play in the crash.
Sorry I did not put Republicans on a pedestal, fact remains Democrats caused the crash.
Prove it show me the vote on the bill.