It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Facebooks censorship purge

page: 9
30
<< 6  7  8   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 4 2019 @ 03:05 AM
link   

originally posted by: continuousThunder

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: continuousThunder

It's not surprising that the leftists would be applauding censorship, but I will always defend the rights of free expression for people I don't even agree with.

And that's what differentiates people like you from me.


odd, it's the way you can make sweeping judgements about someone you don't know from a bar of soap and whose life you have zero understanding of, and somehow come out feeling like you're In The Right that i feel is what truly differentiates "people like you from me"
you're the one drawing the lines, buddy




Luckily for the people that rule and control us plebs they have drones like the op to further the divide and subsequently their goals.




posted on May, 4 2019 @ 11:22 AM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

I haven't opened mine sense last summer. Don't intend to open it again. I don't care to contribute to their profits.



posted on May, 4 2019 @ 02:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: odzeandennz
a reply to: DBCowboy

Yes, Facebook can decide what organizations it allows on its platform based on the rules and agreements and licenses in place used to create what is Facebook today.

They do not have to leave the internet, but they can't stay on Facebook.

Good riddance. Less twaddle.


I feel the same about bakeries.



posted on May, 4 2019 @ 02:17 PM
link   
Facebook isn't big brother because you can choose not to use the service. It only becomes a problem if something like your employer requires you to have a facebook page.



posted on May, 4 2019 @ 03:35 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

Immunity is too big of a blanket.

Did you read the three qualifiers for immunity under section 230 in my link ?

If they violate any one of them they can be sued by the plaintiff .


There’s an article on it by Wired . I would’ve linked it but I’ve already read my allocated stories per month .

Subscribing is highly doubtful for me . Lol
edit on 4-5-2019 by Fallingdown because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 4 2019 @ 03:44 PM
link   
a reply to: Wookiep

That’s always been one of my problem I don’t give up .

Because of their size Facebook and the rest of the tech companies intimidate people and politicians .

But.....

“It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog”

Twain

Never quit on something you believe in .



posted on May, 5 2019 @ 11:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Liquesence

If I said #### on ATS and they banned me, yet you said #### on ATS and they allowed it, then ATS would be Facebook.



Why so hostile?

If you said ### they just might.

So what's your issue man?




top topics



 
30
<< 6  7  8   >>

log in

join