It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Pelosi accuses Barr of lying to congress.

page: 3
24
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 2 2019 @ 06:20 PM
link   
a reply to: network dude

It's not a crime to cause someone of a crime, that would be slander, which is a civil matter. However, once her accusation is in print "on the record" it become libel, which is criminal. Haul boney ass off! I want to see Barr pursue this.

Cheers - Dave




posted on May, 2 2019 @ 06:54 PM
link   
And the saddest part is...
The worthless MSM is already running with how he lied, when he didn't. All over the news. So now, people who continually believe the news, are spouting this crap as gospel.



posted on May, 2 2019 @ 07:00 PM
link   
a reply to: bobs_uruncle

She if Full of Sheit of Course . BTW , On a side note , I just Noticed Nancy's Last Face Lift seems to have Forgotten that Accordian on here Forehead . I would Fire that Incompetent Plastic Surgeon IMO .



posted on May, 2 2019 @ 07:21 PM
link   
a reply to: network dude

Barr was asked if Mueller supported his conclusion, and he said he did not know. But we have since learned that he had received a letter from Mueller prior to this question.

From the letter from Mueller to Barr:


The summary letter the department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this Office's work and conclusions. We communicated that concern to the Department on the morning of March 25. There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation. This threatens to undermine a central purpose for which the Department appointed the special counsel: to assure full confidence in the outcome of the investigation.


It looks like Mueller was very critical of Barr's summary. He did not seem satisfied with Barr's conclusions and had communicated this to Barr's office prior to Barr being questioned by Congress.

So how was Barr not being misleading here?



posted on May, 2 2019 @ 07:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: bobs_uruncle

She if Full of Sheit of Course . BTW , On a side note , I just Noticed Nancy's Last Face Lift seems to have Forgotten that Accordian on here Forehead . I would Fire that Incompetent Plastic Surgeon IMO .


If they pull that sack of flesh anymore, her bellybutton is going to be on her forehead and her asshole where here bellybutton used to be lol. It needs to see those guys on botched :-)

Cheers - Dave



posted on May, 2 2019 @ 07:35 PM
link   
a reply to: bobs_uruncle

This is Nancy's Favorite YouTube Video , Really , No Bullysheit ! ........)






posted on May, 2 2019 @ 07:53 PM
link   



let the memes begin



posted on May, 2 2019 @ 09:13 PM
link   
a reply to: darkbake

Mueller was saying the summary cannot capture full context of the report. The media has twisted this to look like Mueller is suggesting there is something missing from the Barr summary, and that it could be obstruction.

Mueller is more disgruntled with the media than Barr, but still places some fault on Barr for giving the media the opportunity to further manipulate the sheeple. That's what the whole investigation was about, getting the truth out there, and the media have screwed that up again.

edit on 2-5-2019 by SouthernForkway26 because: (no reason given)

edit on 2-5-2019 by SouthernForkway26 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 3 2019 @ 05:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: darkbake
a reply to: network dude

Barr was asked if Mueller supported his conclusion, and he said he did not know. But we have since learned that he had received a letter from Mueller prior to this question.

From the letter from Mueller to Barr:


The summary letter the department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this Office's work and conclusions. We communicated that concern to the Department on the morning of March 25. There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation. This threatens to undermine a central purpose for which the Department appointed the special counsel: to assure full confidence in the outcome of the investigation.


It looks like Mueller was very critical of Barr's summary. He did not seem satisfied with Barr's conclusions and had communicated this to Barr's office prior to Barr being questioned by Congress.

So how was Barr not being misleading here?


From Barr himself:
www.c-span.org.../barr-phone-call-mueller

I hope this clears your confusion up.



posted on May, 3 2019 @ 08:26 AM
link   
Goth accuses Pelosi of continuously and consistently lying in Congress. To Congress and the people
Malfeasance ?



posted on May, 3 2019 @ 08:59 AM
link   
a reply to: SouthernForkway26

Oh no ... the media didn't screw it up. That implies they made some mistake. There is no mistake. It was done on purpose.



posted on May, 4 2019 @ 05:40 AM
link   
a reply to: network dude

From Mueller.


BREAKING: Special Counsel Mueller “deeply disturbed” by Pelosi accusations against AG Barr today and is urging Nadler to push up his hearing to testify and correct the record as soon as possible

mobile.twitter.com...



new topics

top topics



 
24
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join