It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Barr testimony before Senate Judiciary Committee

page: 18
47
<< 15  16  17    19  20  21 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 3 2019 @ 05:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: Krakatoa
a reply to: chr0naut

Did Mueller tell Barr his own conclusion, or that of his office? It's a simple answer, since he is NOT his office, he is an individual.


This is tedious.

Mueller is the head person of his office. His conclusions were included in the Mueller report. There is no indication that there was disagreement between Mueller and his office. Every evidence is that Mueller was in agreement with the conclusions contained in the Mueller report to which he signed his approval. There is no evidence to the contrary.

There is indication that there was disagreement between Mueller's office (where he worked, so he was included) and the conclusions summarized by Barr in his letter to Congress.

But perhaps Mueller disagreed with his own conclusions and beat himself senseless in the stairwell due to a falling out.



edit on 3/5/2019 by chr0naut because: (no reason given)




posted on May, 3 2019 @ 05:48 AM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

It is
The simple answer is you are incorrect
Barr did not lie as he did not know the minds of those on muelers team.
Evenso while he did speak to mueller and had a general idea of muelers thought Barr is not a telepath.
While that may be common in bag end it is not so here.



posted on May, 3 2019 @ 05:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: chr0naut

It is
The simple answer is you are incorrect
Barr did not lie as he did not know the minds of those on muelers team.
Evenso while he did speak to mueller and had a general idea of muelers thought Barr is not a telepath.
While that may be common in bag end it is not so here.


But Barr did know because Mueller sent him a letter about it. Barr is clearly not a telepath but I would assume he can read.



posted on May, 3 2019 @ 06:01 AM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

An all encompassing letter?
Just mueller?
Not muelers team, right?

Lol
You have no idea.
Unless you have special wizard powers.

Stop with the msm lie.
It is easily disproven.
I understand it takes a while for facts to travel s far from the source, but this is ridiculous.

TLB



posted on May, 3 2019 @ 06:18 AM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

No, there isn't. Barr called Mueller and asked him specifically what he disagreed with. Mueller point blank said he did not disagree with anything in Barr's summary. Democrats can ask Mueller. It was a speakerphone call with Rosenstein and possibly others there as well.

Stop lying.



posted on May, 3 2019 @ 06:19 AM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

They also had a phone conversation, why do you keep ignoring that?



posted on May, 3 2019 @ 06:28 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Would it have been too much to ask that he look at the evidence before making his sweeping declaration of innocence?
I mean really?



posted on May, 3 2019 @ 06:32 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

And Barrs reputation is shot and trumps numbers take another dive.
America is not buying what Barr is saying.
Because the general public isn't stupid.



posted on May, 3 2019 @ 06:37 AM
link   

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: chr0naut

They also had a phone conversation, why do you keep ignoring that?


A phone call whose documentation and notes Barr refuses to supply to Congress. We have what Mueller said in writing, we have no idea what was said on the phone. Was he "snitty" with Barr, again?

I hope Mueller testifies, and doesn't hold back.



posted on May, 3 2019 @ 06:38 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Obviously you didn't read it.
Its loaded with evidence.
Not hidden.... not innuendo.. not suggestive...
Its in there. Solid evidence which he gave us.
Keep pretending.
Like trump you will be very surprised by how this all ends.
And its not over even though trump said it is.

They are already calling for Barrs resignation.



posted on May, 3 2019 @ 06:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: InTheLight
but 50% of them are lawyers?
was barr to be submitted to practicing lawyers?
I was under the impression he was to testify before the senate judiciary committee?
Do the committees rules allow for people to be questioned by others than the senators?


Again, he should be questioned by seasoned lawyers who know how to play the gobbeldygook game, that is, after reading the unredacted report.


At that point it becomes an interrogation with evil intensions by unelected henchmen 😆


Don't you mean calling in the Gobbeldygook Squad is evil because the AG won't have a chance?


They follow laws here (sometimes) 😆


What's your point?



posted on May, 3 2019 @ 06:48 AM
link   
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

You mean like when Barr had no idea about Manafort giving polling data to the Ukraine? That kind of Gotcha moment?
Because not only did Barr not view the evidence. He never even read the report. Not all of it. I heard him say so.

In't it nice that he made up his mind by what was in his mind.... the president can't break the law.... Hello Richard Nixon.
And not based on the preponderance of evidence collected by Robert Mueller over the last two years and laid out in his report.



posted on May, 3 2019 @ 06:51 AM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody




the decision not to charge anyone?


Was it your view that they could not charge a sitting president? Where were you on that issue?



posted on May, 3 2019 @ 06:55 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

It's the SC job to look at the evidence. That's why they had 3 freakin years. Now you don't trust Mueller?

I bet you wanted that fake narrative pushed 'till 2020, amirite?






posted on May, 3 2019 @ 06:58 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

Ok explian how Manafort has anything to do with President Trump Obstructing Justice!


I have all day, so take your time.



posted on May, 3 2019 @ 06:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: chr0naut

They also had a phone conversation, why do you keep ignoring that?


Because the letter is evidence that Barr knew that Mueller disapproved of Barr's summary. The 'unrecorded 'phone call, not so much.

If there had been a phone call to sort out Mueller's disagreement, then Barr would still have known about Mueller's conclusions.

Barr said "I don't know whether Bob Mueller supported my conclusion". The evidence shows that he did.



posted on May, 3 2019 @ 06:59 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: xuenchen

They are already calling for Barrs resignation.


Oh my god, that settles it then that Barr is corrupt (in your head, of course).

The crazy-loonie-tuney leftists are asking for Barr's resignation because they didn't liked what's in the report..

Who would've seen this coming?

edit on 3/5/2019 by vinifalou because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 3 2019 @ 07:03 AM
link   

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: chr0naut

No, there isn't. Barr called Mueller and asked him specifically what he disagreed with. Mueller point blank said he did not disagree with anything in Barr's summary. Democrats can ask Mueller. It was a speakerphone call with Rosenstein and possibly others there as well.

Stop lying.


Stop lying saying I am lying, you lying liar.




posted on May, 3 2019 @ 07:06 AM
link   

originally posted by: thedigirati
a reply to: Sillyolme

Ok explian how Manafort has anything to do with President Trump Obstructing Justice!


I have all day, so take your time.


Briefly? Dangling pardons and witness intimidation.



posted on May, 3 2019 @ 07:13 AM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

Sorry, not once in the letter does Mueller say he disapproves of the summary. He seemed to disapprove of what the media was saying.

Why don't Democrats simply ask Mueller if the phone conversation took place?

There was no disagreement, nothing to sort out. Barr asked Mueller if he had an issue with the facts of the summary, Mueller did not. Please stop lying about what has taken place.



new topics

top topics



 
47
<< 15  16  17    19  20  21 >>

log in

join