It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Barr testimony before Senate Judiciary Committee

page: 17
47
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 2 2019 @ 03:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: Erno86
Jeffery Toobin: "Barr's answer total gobbledegook"



I don't know of that person and could care less what CNN thinks ever again.




posted on May, 2 2019 @ 05:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: Erno86
Jeffery Toobin: "Barr's answer total gobbledegook"



The real gobbledegook was today ...........



posted on May, 2 2019 @ 06:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: Erno86
Jeffery Toobin: "Barr's answer total gobbledegook"



I don't know of that person and could care less what CNN thinks ever again.


It's pretty funny. I constantly see users start a "discussion" , add nothing of substance in actual conversation beyond talking points, and then when asked to engage will just supply a link or video. It's like, "here: I don't know what I'm talking about, but this guy will tell you what you should believe". It's kinda sad.

Frightening



posted on May, 2 2019 @ 08:40 PM
link   
Just think y'all, only 6 more yrs (at least), watching these bozo's chase Unicorns on taxpayer dollars.



posted on May, 2 2019 @ 08:53 PM
link   
a reply to: mtnshredder

He was a No Show Today . If you just Ignore a Socialist Democrat , what Empty Threat can they Throw at you Next ? Chicken Little Sheit ?
edit on 2-5-2019 by Zanti Misfit because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 2 2019 @ 10:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: mtnshredder
Just think y'all, only 6 more yrs (at least), watching these bozo's chase Unicorns on taxpayer dollars.


Yes, but it for 'the people' after all. Where are you people to take them down?



posted on May, 2 2019 @ 10:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: burntheships

originally posted by: chr0naut

Nope.

My conclusion is that Barr was aware that Mueller was dissatisfied with the way his report had been summarized and when Barr was questioned directly about Mueller's dissatisfaction of that summary, he lied about it, feigning ignorance.



Your conclusion based on what evidence?


The letters, the transcript of the meeting and the YouTube stream.

You still can't quote the lie. Put it together, prove the lie, so far you just keep saying it happened.


Barr gave an untruthful answer to a simple and direct question.

Here is the question: "Did Bob Mueller support your conclusion"

Here is the answer: "I don't know whether Bob Mueller supported my conclusion"

The lie is that he knew that Mueller had written to him, saying: "The summary letter the Department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this Office’s work and conclusions."



posted on May, 2 2019 @ 10:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: burntheships

originally posted by: chr0naut

Nope.

My conclusion is that Barr was aware that Mueller was dissatisfied with the way his report had been summarized and when Barr was questioned directly about Mueller's dissatisfaction of that summary, he lied about it, feigning ignorance.



Your conclusion based on what evidence?


The letters, the transcript of the meeting and the YouTube stream.

You still can't quote the lie. Put it together, prove the lie, so far you just keep saying it happened.


Barr gave an untruthful answer to a simple and direct question.

Here is the question: "Did Bob Mueller support your conclusion"

Here is the answer: "I don't know whether Bob Mueller supported my conclusion"

The lie is that he knew that Mueller had written to him, saying: "The summary letter the Department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this Office’s work and conclusions."


May I ask you, if you interpret this snippet "this Office’s work and conclusions" as meaning Mueller's own personal conclusion?

To me, it represents the conclusion of the office's conclusion. That office consisted of many different people besides Mueller. As such, that type of conclusion typically is a compromise statement of the collective and not of any one particular person. So, Barr did not really know Mueller's personal conclusion, as he was asked directly, and his answer was not a lie but a bold faced fact. He never spoke to nor received any correspondence from Mueller himself that represented his own personal conclusion.



posted on May, 2 2019 @ 10:54 PM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

Is mueller his office?



posted on May, 2 2019 @ 10:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krakatoa

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: burntheships

originally posted by: chr0naut

Nope.

My conclusion is that Barr was aware that Mueller was dissatisfied with the way his report had been summarized and when Barr was questioned directly about Mueller's dissatisfaction of that summary, he lied about it, feigning ignorance.



Your conclusion based on what evidence?


The letters, the transcript of the meeting and the YouTube stream.

You still can't quote the lie. Put it together, prove the lie, so far you just keep saying it happened.


Barr gave an untruthful answer to a simple and direct question.

Here is the question: "Did Bob Mueller support your conclusion"

Here is the answer: "I don't know whether Bob Mueller supported my conclusion"

The lie is that he knew that Mueller had written to him, saying: "The summary letter the Department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this Office’s work and conclusions."


May I ask you, if you interpret this snippet "this Office’s work and conclusions" as meaning Mueller's own personal conclusion?

To me, it represents the conclusion of the office's conclusion. That office consisted of many different people besides Mueller. As such, that type of conclusion typically is a compromise statement of the collective and not of any one particular person. So, Barr did not really know Mueller's personal conclusion, as he was asked directly, and his answer was not a lie but a bold faced fact. He never spoke to nor received any correspondence from Mueller himself that represented his own personal conclusion.


Mueller using the language that he did, was clearly saying that the conclusions reached by those working in the office of the Special Counsel, including himself (because he worked in his own office) were at odds with the conclusions published by Barr. That is the whole point of Mueller's one page letter to Barr of the 27th April.



posted on May, 2 2019 @ 11:00 PM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

Including
That means more than just mueller
So barr didn't lie
You did



posted on May, 2 2019 @ 11:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: chr0naut

Is mueller his office?


No, he represents his office, the office of the Special Counsel, because he IS the Special Counsel and he works there, because it's his office.

I know this is incredibly confusing.




posted on May, 2 2019 @ 11:01 PM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

So you simply lie
Barr did not
TLB



posted on May, 2 2019 @ 11:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: chr0naut

Including
That means more than just mueller
So barr didn't lie
You did


Because Mueller is the chief, boss, leader and figurehead of 'his office', the conclusions of his office therefore might be rationally assumed to include his conclusions.

It would be nonsense that, in a letter which he personally signed, he was in disagreement with the conclusions of others in his office, without him actually saying that he had different conclusions. He didn't voice any such difference of opinion to the conclusion of others in his office.

So therefore Mueller and all those who worked in his office had agreement on their conclusions, but disagreed with those expressed by Barr as expressly conveyed in his letter to Barr dated 27 April (hint: the letter contained no other topic other than the disagreement with Barr's conclusions).



posted on May, 2 2019 @ 11:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: chr0naut

Is mueller his office?


Is Mueller his arm or his leg? But he has two of them! So, which one is him and which one isn't? Clearly they aren't his actually arms and legs and he is lying.

Covfefe!




posted on May, 2 2019 @ 11:22 PM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

What is nonsense is that you submit, without any source or evidence, that all in muellers office were in total agreement.
Were they a hive?
Even if they were for anyone to expect barr to know what THEY were thinking is ridiculous and simply upside down.
Nothing more than an ignorant lie perpetrated by those on the wrong side of a legal decision they disagree with.



posted on May, 2 2019 @ 11:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: chr0naut

Is mueller his office?


Is Mueller his arm or his leg? But he has two of them! So, which one is him and which one isn't? Clearly they aren't his actually arms and legs and he is lying.

Covfefe!


TLB
Thanks for that



posted on May, 2 2019 @ 11:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: chr0naut

Is mueller his office?


Is Mueller his arm or his leg? But he has two of them! So, which one is him and which one isn't? Clearly they aren't his actually arms and legs and he is lying.

Covfefe!



The COVFEFE Act 😎



posted on May, 2 2019 @ 11:49 PM
link   
If only they could subpoena Mueller and ask him clear direct questions... But they didn't try that first. Odd... It's almost as though the faux outrage is more important than the answers... Almost like they don't want clear direct answers so they can continue smearing by innuendo...



posted on May, 3 2019 @ 12:09 AM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

Did Mueller tell Barr his own conclusion, or that of his office? It's a simple answer, since he is NOT his office, he is an individual.


edit on 5/3/2019 by Krakatoa because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
47
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join