Mueller contradicts self in smearing Trump publicly

The very fact that Mueller cares about media or public interpretation makes it abundantly clear that he was biased and unfit to carry out the investigation. Once he submitted his report his job was OVER. He has no business whining about what the public should be told or how his boss, Barr, interprets the report.

The facts remain the same. No collusion and no obstruction - the latter because the DoJ assessed Mueller's report and came to the determination, because he could not. What Mueller seems to want is to be allowed to spin an investigation where he could NOT find a crime into something damaging for his target. Totally unprofessional and totally at odds with what a prosecutor should be engaged in.

He's like a batter who just had strike 3 called arguing with the umpire and refusing to leave the plate.

It is what it is.
The letter will more than likely be published today.
Oh and Mueller didn't manufacture any dirt on trump. trump's his own dirt manufacturer.
But the fact that Mueller felt it necessary to clarify his report in light of Barrs four page letter summary (thats not a summary what ever that means)... tells us that Barr is misrepresenting the nature and context of the report according to media coverage.
Look I read it and I know it did not say that trump is innocent and it clearly shows that Russia interfered and that the trump family knew about it and were all okay with it. And that trump did everything in his power and then some to stop the investigation or direct its scope and outcome. FACT
and that is the bottom line...

a reply to: Sillyolme

Barr's letter was about conclusions not context.
There is no need for context as the full report has been released.
Wakey wakey.

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

The media and the democrats are two separate groups. Something that keeps getting lost on these boards.

a reply to: UKTruth

The very fact that Mueller cares about media or public interpretation makes it abundantly clear that he was biased and unfit to carry out the investigation

How does that make anything abundantly clear? What is makes clear is that he does not want his twenty two months of work flushed down the toilet by a trump sycophant fan boy.
That he does not agree with the story that Barr is trying to portray here.

And that he is not willing to let this interpretation of his findings go unchallenged.
That is what is abundantly clear.

a reply to: UKTruth

Really because from what is being reported the letter said context, nature and substance... Maybe your English is different from mine huh?

context, nature and substance.... tell me what that means to you.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

The media and the democrats are two separate groups. Something that keeps getting lost on these boards.

Are they? Why do they both say the same thing, even when proven wrong?

Now show me Mueller's letter you keep talking about. You keep talking about exactly what it says, so it must be available to read somewhere.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
It is what it is.
The letter will more than likely be published today.
Oh and Mueller didn't manufacture any dirt on trump. trump's his own dirt manufacturer.
But the fact that Mueller felt it necessary to clarify his report in light of Barrs four page letter summary (thats not a summary what ever that means)... tells us that Barr is misrepresenting the nature and context of the report according to media coverage.
Look I read it and I know it did not say that trump is innocent and it clearly shows that Russia interfered and that the trump family knew about it and were all okay with it. And that trump did everything in his power and then some to stop the investigation or direct its scope and outcome. FACT
and that is the bottom line...

The bot says that the letter is going to be published today.....

The Washington post never makes up stories about Trump and then later is proven wrong so we should probably believe the spam bot!!!

Lol

originally posted by: xuenchen
roflmao

MSM is using this fake BS to say Barr lied to Congress !!

Now we know why the WP and CNN pushed this BS 😆😆😆😆😆

Like mueller or his report mean squat at this point

Fade into history bobby 2 sticks
You couldn't stand up to trump like the dems wanted
You sound like a jilted high school girlfriend

No charges
Go away

a reply to: Sillyolme

It means no charges
Are you daft?

Trump won

a reply to: Scepticaldem

And they are still better than CNN, where they have run stories where their sources have publicly come forward saying the stories are wrong and CNN won't retract them.

a reply to: Sillyolme

If Trump had done "everything in his power and then some" he would have fired Mueller and there would have been no legal recourse for Congress at all.

a reply to: Grambler

Your fundamental premises are as far as I got. Your continued belief that ‘it was all a lie’ blinds you to the facts within the Mueller report.

As an exercise, I dare you to imagine that the Muller Report was all about Clinton and her campaign. Read it with her name instead of Trump’s and Podesta instead of Manafort. Imagine all the people around her that were indicted, and the sealed indictments and cases that have yet to go forward in NY. (I’m guessing folks here would be calling for her blood. And if she did what Trump has done, I would call her a criminal with no hesitation.)

We are simply not on the same planet otherwise.

Peace to you. Good luck. It will all eventually hit the fan, and we will either still have an American democracy, or Trump will have killed the rule of law and we will devolve into a dictatorship. Or, if we’re lucky, the tattered edges of our Constitution will be revived in a future year, but the damage will last decades.

Fun times!

a reply to: AboveBoard

Hahahaha, it is proven public fact the Democrats broke the rule of law and weaponized the government against political enemies. It is likely to be proven they abused the FISA court system.

Democrats are trying to destroy checks and balances (electoral college), instituted by the Founding Fathers in order to protect Democracy, in order to maintain power. They want to stack the Supreme Court in order to maintain power. Everything they do is about them controlling permanent power in this country.

Somehow you are stuck on REEEEEE #OrangeManBad, after an exhaustive 2 year investigation finds nothing.

The MSM has egg on its face

Barr is killing it

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

And that is a wicked steaming pile of BS on echo from the greatest liars our country has ever seen in power.

The most corrupt President ever is Donald J Trump. May he get everything he deserves and may his lying lackies find themselves voted out of power forever.

Enjoy your sad form of “winning” as it tears the nation to shreds.

a reply to: AboveBoard

Well mueller didnt charge trump so it appears you are incorrect
Nixon resigned
Cinton was impeached

DJT hasn't even been charged

a reply to: Grambler

That was the funniest part of this news story hitting last night. They claimed mueller disagreed with barr's summary, but then when you read it, you realized mueller actually disagreed with the media's characterization of the summary.

But here's where my take differs from yours: You have to realize this is after THREE DAYS of coverage. They were in full on spin mode at that point. "Barr is a trump guy," the report is far more damaging than the barr summary," "barr is covering up the real findings!"

So when you view it through that lens the whole letter takes on a new light.

ETA: Also remember that Mueller was offered a chance to look at and provide feedback on the summary before it was released, and he declined.

originally posted by: AboveBoard
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

And that is a wicked steaming pile of BS on echo from the greatest liars our country has ever seen in power.

The most corrupt President ever is Donald J Trump. May he get everything he deserves and may his lying lackies find themselves voted out of power forever.

Enjoy your sad form of “winning” as it tears the nation to shreds.

Oh it is? Are you saying Obama did not illegally spy on his opposition? Are you saying he was not rebuked for it?

In 2013, the Obama Justice Department labeled then-Fox News reporter James Rosen a “criminal co-conspirator” under the Espionage Act of 1917. And all because the reporter used a State Department contractor as a source for a story. Rosen was also labeled a "flight risk."

In May 2013, the Associated Press revealed that the Justice Department had secretly collected two months' worth of personal and work-related phone calls made by AP reporters and editors.

Federal officials secretly obtained records on incoming and outgoing calls made by specific AP journalists, as well as general news staff, the news group reported, potentially compromising many sources totally unrelated to the investigation. Federal investigators even collected data on calls made by AP reporters in the House of Representatives press gallery.

www.washingtonexaminer.com... ooms

Obama’s NSA Rebuked For Illegal Surveillance of Americans

www.countable.us...

a reply to: AboveBoard

The most corrupt President ever is Donald J Trump.

President A:
Spied on the political campaign of his parties opponent
Sent billions of dollars to iran
Accidentally crashed a drone in iranian territory and didn't destroy it
Told russian officials to wait until after the election then he could be more flexible
Traded three terrorist leaders for one pleb who deserted
Used the IRS to target political opponents
Lied, directed others to lie, and covered up a terrorist attack on our embassy
Pretended to not know about hillary's email server, despite having communicated extensively with her through it
Used the office to devalue companies so his buddies could buy them for pennies on the dollar
Paid off the unions so they could continue contributing to his party
His VP bragged about getting the head law enforcement official of another country fired because he was investigating his son
His AG is the ONLY AG in american history to be held in criminal contempt of congress
His Secretary of state destroyed subpoenaed evidence
He gave tax payer money, through grants, to his donor's companies
Told his law enforcement to stand down during russian attempts to influence our elections
Told illegal immigrants they could vote, no one would be watching to turn them in
Spied on journalists
Spied on congressmembers

I'll stop there, but I could at least double that list

President B:
Was investigated for two years and exonerated of the main underlying crime
Paid off a woman he had an affair with 12 years prior to the election
Owns a business and refuses to shut it down to appease the un-appeasable, after running it for 30 years

You're talking about president A, right?