It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

NO Democrats have Opted to View the Mostly Un-Redected Mueller Report.

page: 5
34
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 5 2019 @ 01:50 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

No he wont let them take notes or talk about what is says because it does not say what he said it does.
I know because I actually read the friggin thing.
Did you?




posted on May, 5 2019 @ 01:52 PM
link   
How many republicans took advantage of the offer?

None because they choose to stay ignorant.

This plays both ways.

How many do you think?



posted on May, 5 2019 @ 01:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: xuenchen

No he wont let them take notes or talk about what is says because it does not say what he said it does.
I know because I actually read the friggin thing.
Did you?


It's classified material 😆😆😆😆



posted on May, 5 2019 @ 01:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: xuenchen

Oh it was plenty clear. That's why everyone is angry with Barr.
He lied and he is trying so very very hard to clear the president. But its just not working.


Barr hasn't lied and you know it 😆

Red Herrings getting stale 😆



posted on May, 5 2019 @ 01:58 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

He lies just like his lying boss does.
But he seems at least to feel bad about it. LOL...

His reputation is schitte now. everybody trump touches....



posted on May, 5 2019 @ 02:04 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

Looks like you've watched all the Sunday MSNBC shows today 😎




posted on May, 5 2019 @ 02:05 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Break the law? Too late for that the dude lied under oath.

Ask Richard Nixon about his private tapes. Oh you can't he's dead.....
But the history books show clearly that he had fork em over anyway.



posted on May, 5 2019 @ 02:13 PM
link   
a reply to: PilSungMtnMan

How about Barr acted like the summary was the report since he admitted he hadn't actually read the thing.
Or looked at the evidence.

He had his mind made up before Mueller printed out one page of his report.



posted on May, 5 2019 @ 02:15 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

How many republicans have looked at the less redacted report?



posted on May, 5 2019 @ 02:18 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

I'm surprised he didnt tell them they could look at is as long as they wore a blindfold.
You can justify anything they do cant you?



posted on May, 5 2019 @ 02:21 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

You have a point?



posted on May, 5 2019 @ 02:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: carewemust

How many republicans have looked at the less redacted report?



the exact same amount that have asked to see the unredacted report. which is 0

Of a report that BY LAW (that democrats passed) did NOT have to be shown at all.

then
Dems: we have to make all future reports hidden so we don't get "clintoned" again

Repubs: ok

now
Dems: we wanna see all the report

repubs: you made a law that we cannot show it

Dems: what are you trying to hide?

you cannot make this up. it's hysterics that are hysterical

this would be like asking for a psych eval on YOU silly, as fun as it would be to see it would still mean nothing.

feel free to show me where I am wrong.



posted on May, 5 2019 @ 02:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: carewemust

How many republicans have looked at the less redacted report?


I remembered Graham had stated during the hearings that he had read it, but my search online says he was not the only one.

Far as I estimate 3 of the 6 republicans have viewed the unredacted version that Barr offered for review Collins and Graham on Tuesday and McConnel on Thursday. Have not seen if the other 3 republicans have viewed it at this time.

Collins and Graham stated that there was nothing under those redactions that would have any bearings on Mueller's conclusions.

Source

Edit add: which still leaves 0 of the 6 Dems invited still have not looked at it. Hmmm...guess I will listen to those who looked at it over those who refuse to.


edit on 5 5 2019 by CynConcepts because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 5 2019 @ 03:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
The unredacted copy had better be in the hall of congress tomorrow or someone is in trouble.


You should spread the word to increase current dosage levels ahead of time, in case it's the usual same bad news for democrats when nothing will happen to Trump except good things, and more bad mojo for the democrats like always so far.

The left isn't beating a dead horse on this one anymore, because it's moved far beyond that into Molesting a herd of dead horses. Quite obscene at this point. The democrats will NEVER receive satisfaction to their twisted morality.




posted on May, 5 2019 @ 03:38 PM
link   
a reply to: CynConcepts

that wall you just erected has got to hurt.

So So sorry silly!

Any other misinformation you'd like to pass along?

do it in small amounts, it's hard to breath at times from the laughter.


I have to give the Clintons some credit though, without them, we would never have had Trump.



posted on May, 5 2019 @ 09:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: xuenchen

No he wont let them take notes or talk about what is says because it does not say what he said it does.
I know because I actually read the friggin thing.
Did you?
I think your full of it ms. silly. You've already mentioned this and have been proven wrong on the very page you tried using as an example. If you did "supposedly" read it as you said you did, then you have some comprehension issues to resolve.



posted on May, 5 2019 @ 09:17 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Maybe if he had Added " Pictures " they Might Reconsider .......




top topics



 
34
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join