NO Democrats have Opted to View the Mostly Un-Redected Mueller Report.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
The offer was to view it. Take no notes and dont talk about what you saw.

Guess we know why.

I cant wait to see the letter that Mueller sent to Barr.

Which states Barrs comments failed to capture context, nature and substance of the report.

And anyone who read it could see that too. Except those who choose to stay blind.

The report lays out the concerns that Mueller has about the way the report is being portrayed by the whitehouse and the DOJ. Saying that they are sowing confusion when people can clearly see that the report does not say what they are claiming it says.

You were saying before they should not be able to talk about it publicly, and they wouldn't. Now you are upset they can't talk about it publicly?

a reply to: carewemust

what good is a report if you cant take notes or talk to anyone about what is in it?
Nadler is not looking for self satisfaction.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: carewemust

what good is a report if you cant take notes or talk to anyone about what is in it?
Nadler is not looking for self satisfaction.

They would know what it says. Why don't they want to know what it says?

originally posted by: Sillyolme
Just breaking... Robert Mueller has told William Barr that his commentary about the report does not accurately reflect the findings of his investigation.
Like Mueller associates have been saying since Barr made is determination in less than 48 hours that the president was exonerated.
When the report actually was a road map laid out by Mueller for congress to do what DOJ rules forbade him doing.

So it’s official? The President, YOUR President, is gong to be impeached?

No?

Maybe during his next term then?

a reply to: carewemust

Him talking to the senate is like having dinner at the Hatfields.... when you're a Hatfield.
On Thursday he has dinner with the McCoys.

a reply to: Sillyolme

Mueller and his entire team of accomplished and experienced lawyers couldn't seem to write a report that was clear on context ?

Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa😆😆😆😆😆😆

a reply to: Sillyolme

If Democrats want to know the truth, why won't they read it?

If there is something damning won't it help them formulate questions to Barr?

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

That we know why Barr wont let them take notes or talk about it.

Because it doesnt say what he says it does.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: carewemust

what good is a report if you cant take notes or talk to anyone about what is in it?
Nadler is not looking for self satisfaction.

No.. he's looking to make political points.

Which he can't do if he can't quote it.

So it is useless to him, because what he wants has nothing to do with Trump's innocence or guilt.

Just more proof that Nadler isn't in this for anything but politics.

Because he is still as pissed as you are that you and yours got whipped in the 2016 election.

a reply to: Lumenari

Come on over its on tv....
coffee? tea? cocktail?

We don't even need the unredacted report. What we got is quite condemning on its own.
Now we need Mueller to testify before congress in open session too.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

That we know why Barr wont let them take notes or talk about it.

Because it doesnt say what he says it does.

Because there's sensitive classified material involved.

But I bet Hillary would agree it doesn't make much difference 😆😆😆

originally posted by: carewemust
Tuesday, April 30, 2019

It has been available to Congress for 10 days. The Democrats have been screaming for it, even while it's available!

On the eve of Attorney General William Barr’s testimony on a redacted version of special counsel Robert Mueller’s report, only two lawmakers have set eyes on the secret information that Barr withheld from public view.

Barr offered access to a less-redacted version of the report to just 12 members of Congress — six Democrats and six Republicans. But as of Tuesday afternoon, only Rep. Doug Collins, the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee, and Sen. Lindsey Graham, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, opted to view it.

A third, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said he planned to review the report later Tuesday.

Source: www.politico.com...

What the hell is wrong with Congressional Democrats?

Even if suffering with a Trump or Republican "derangement syndrome", shouldn't they feel some moral and ethical responsibility to exhibit a little integrity?

-CareWeMust

This only proves what the world already knows, that these pompous democrats already know there is nothing there that can help their "destroy Trump" quest, so they only use their own media friendly blathering in it's place to continue in attempts to deceive those followers who only listen to them and don't really want the truth either.

Moral and ethical responsibility conflicts with these kinds of dirt bags, and they have their own kind of corrupted morals to live by. Their ethical responsibility is shaped by the lies they live by, so that to is corrupted to be the opposite of true responsibility.

Power withdrawals, that's a very fitting way to describe it, as 'vxn said.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

That we know why Barr wont let them take notes or talk about it.

Because it doesnt say what he says it does.

And they would not have to talk about it. They could ask him questions about it, knowing the answer, and force him to divulge it. They won't though .. wonder why ...

originally posted by: Sillyolme
We don't even need the unredacted report. What we got is quite condemning on its own.
Now we need Mueller to testify before congress in open session too.

I would bet real money you could find something damaging to Trump inside a bubble gum wrapper as well.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Lumenari

Come on over its on tv....
coffee? tea? cocktail?

Oh yea... my biggest wish is to sit down with you and watch the DNC Talking Points Channel.

Someone already posted the link since you don't know how to.

So it's been debunked while you were watching it.

Welcome to the interwebz, baby....

a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

I doubt it.

a reply to: Lumenari

You wanted my source... thats it.

Apparently Mueller has sent a letter to the AG.




PS Most people like me. Honest. I have friends of every ilk.
I bet if we met and I was introduced to you as Karen and we were not talking politics which I seldom do in my life. you would probably like me too.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: carewemust

Him talking to the senate is like having dinner at the Hatfields.... when you're a Hatfield.
On Thursday he has dinner with the McCoys.

Amazingly, more accurate than you realize. Most experts believe that the Hatfield/McCoy feud began when a hatfield was accused of stealing a McCoy hog in 1878. The judge was a hatfield and being fair made a equal jury of 6 hatfields and 6 Mccoys. It was determined there was no real evidence to convict so a not guilty plea came forward. Mccoys still believed it was corrupted and refused to accept they accused the wrong man.

Hatfield and McCoy feud biography

a reply to: CynConcepts

There was a series on cable a few years back wasn't there.
Interesting story huh?