It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump sues Deutsche Bank, Capital One to block House subpoenas

page: 5
19
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 30 2019 @ 11:36 AM
link   
a reply to: Middleoftheroad

Thanks.
Guess we wait and see.
In most cases congress wins these things.




posted on Apr, 30 2019 @ 11:46 AM
link   
a reply to: Middleoftheroad

Numbers don't lie. If they are falsely presented information someone will call that out and correct it. Don't you worry about anything like that. Thats a really stupid reason to want to conceal records. The records are what they are. Either they are legal or they are not. There is no grey area.



posted on Apr, 30 2019 @ 11:48 AM
link   
another bs fishing expedition
from a partisan congress no less

what crime this time?
making the dems cry?



posted on Apr, 30 2019 @ 11:48 AM
link   
never mind
edit on 4302019 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 30 2019 @ 11:50 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

They all smell like 60yo grannys?
A veritable witches brew of disgusting odors?
edit on 30/4/2019 by shooterbrody because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 30 2019 @ 12:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
never mind

you gave up on the opinion question?
hmmm wonder why????



posted on Apr, 30 2019 @ 12:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: SailorJerry

Would you be ok with him being indicted when he's out of office?


I have to ask, are you? I mean with whomever in high places may have broken a law or two. Because most of us have been pretty consistent on that front. At least most of us on one particular side.



posted on Apr, 30 2019 @ 03:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: rickymouse




Big businessmen do shady deals often, banks seem to want their business so just want paperwork to show things are ok to give the loan.

Bank fraud is a crime.


Did Trump actually defraud the bank? Or is it a charge that was made up by someone trying to discredit trump or who has sour grapes with Trump. I have known people over the years that mistated their income when applying for a loan, the bank denied them the loan. No charges were filed, the loan has to be given before it is classified as a crime. The banks catch most that try to pull this kind of thing, but often if the person is a friend or associate of the bank president, they work with the person to get them the loan. Been that way since I started dealing with banks back in the seventies, sometimes you wonder, how the hell someone could get a lone when they are so far under water. It is who you know or who you are that is a deciding factor sometimes. I have a lifetime of experience of observing others.



posted on Apr, 30 2019 @ 03:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: rickymouse

Did our intelligence agencies determine that Deutsche Bank was laundering money for Russia?
Was dealing with said bank prohibited for US citizens?
I believe the answer to both questions is yes.


If American citizens are not allowed to do business with that bank and Trump did business with the bank, then he is guilty of doing so.

But, your statements are wrong, I have found no such policy when I did research the subject after reading your BS

Here is what I did find that is relevant. www.motherjones.com...

I do not know where you get your info from, but it is silly crap.



posted on Apr, 30 2019 @ 03:39 PM
link   
Name the last time Congress asked for the financial records of a POTUS's family, children or grandchildren. Go ahead.

There is no legal basis for it. None. Again, if there was ANYTHING solid it would have been published before the election. BEFORE.

Would all of you be ok to turn over all of your bank records to Congress? I think he should sign an EO demanding the financial records of Congress. See how they react to that.



posted on Apr, 30 2019 @ 04:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
another bs fishing expedition
from a partisan congress no less

what crime this time?
making the dems cry?


They're looking for the "cry-mmm" of the Century !! 😆




posted on Apr, 30 2019 @ 04:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: matafuchs
Name the last time Congress asked for the financial records of a POTUS's family, children or grandchildren. Go ahead.

There is no legal basis for it. None. Again, if there was ANYTHING solid it would have been published before the election. BEFORE.

Would all of you be ok to turn over all of your bank records to Congress? I think he should sign an EO demanding the financial records of Congress. See how they react to that.


www.politifact.com...


We’re not aware of any congressional investigations into Obama’s personal finances, as could happen to Trump, whose business and real estate holdings are much more extensive than Obama’s. One possible Democratic effort, to obtain Trump’s tax returns, wasn’t needed under Obama because Obama released his voluntarily, as had all presidents going back to Richard Nixon.



posted on Apr, 30 2019 @ 10:37 PM
link   
a reply to: JAGStorm

Nope...




We’re not aware of any congressional investigations into Obama’s personal finances, as could happen to Trump, whose business and real estate holdings are much more extensive than Obama’s. One possible Democratic effort, to obtain Trump’s tax returns, wasn’t needed under Obama because Obama released his voluntarily, as had all presidents going back to Richard Nixon.


Sorry but nope....






Trump tweeted, "The Dems and their committees are going ‘nuts.’

The Republicans never did this to President Obama." Obama didn't face the types of investigations of his personal and financial life the Trump did, partly because Obama was more transparent about his holdings and his personal finances were less complicated.


He had nothing to be transparent about but he sure is rich now....



posted on May, 1 2019 @ 09:13 AM
link   
a reply to: Middleoftheroad

Uh huh.

Trump has been very vocal in the past when it comes to candidates releasing their returns, birth certificates, school records etc.

But when it comes to releasing his info. All of a sudden he's suing for it to not get released? Double standard?



posted on May, 19 2019 @ 03:11 PM
link   
a reply to: Middleoftheroad

Early reporting regarding this show that Deutsche Bank had flagged several transactions as suspicious and advised that they be reported to government officials. U.S. Treasury Department
Accounts of both trump and his son in law were flagged...
the transactions suddenly just disappeared from the suspicious lists when management from the bank pulled the reports.
And just because we all love a conspiracy... the lady who flagged the transactions was then fired from Deutsche Bank.
edit on 5192019 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 19 2019 @ 03:14 PM
link   
This could be a big deal and it is not something that Mueller investigated.

www.nbcnews.com...[edit by]edit on 5192019 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 19 2019 @ 03:18 PM
link   

Anti-money laundering specialists at Deutsche Bank flagged multiple transactions involving Donald Trump and his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, from 2016 and 2017. Those specialists recommended the activity be reported to the federal government's financial crimes unit, The New York Times reported Sunday.


Tammy McFadden, a former Deutsche Bank employee, said she reviewed transactions that involved Kushner's company and Russians in the summer of 2016.


www.nbcnews.com...



posted on May, 19 2019 @ 03:22 PM
link   
Hmmmmm.... what could they have been paying the Russians for I wonder?

Or what were the Russians paying for?

Or was this more like the classic money laundering that trump was charged with in regards to his New Jersey casinos?

Oh I am sure that its all just a misunderstanding.



posted on May, 19 2019 @ 03:26 PM
link   

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Anti-money laundering specialists at Deutsche Bank AG recommended in 2016 and 2017 that multiple transactions involving entities controlled by President Donald Trump and his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, be reported to a federal financial-crimes watchdog, the New York Times reported on Sunday.




The newspaper, citing five current and former Deutsche Bank employees, said executives at the German-based bank, which has lent billions of dollars to the Trump and Kushner companies, rejected their employees’ advice. The reports were never filed with the government.


That's interesting that the management disregarded their specialists advice for some reason. That and it is also reported by the Times that MCFadden was subsequently fired from her job.



posted on May, 19 2019 @ 03:28 PM
link   
Oh and just cuz.... some of the transactions involved the now defunct trump Foundation.



new topics

top topics


active topics

 
19
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join