It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

President Trump‘s priorities poll.

page: 1
10
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 29 2019 @ 08:32 PM
link   
I don’t know if there is a poll feature here. So let’s do it the old-fashioned way .

I’ll list the priorities I can think of. If you agree with what someone says give them a star . Later we can add up all the stars from the multiple post in agreement and see how the percentages worked out . Do the same when someone gives better reasoning for that priority . If you can think of another priority please add it along with your thoughts.

If there is a poll feature would someone set it up ? It would be appreciated .

#1 The first priority is of course the wall .

We need to stop the onslaught of illegal immigration .

It harms the workforce, stagnates wages and cost anywhere from $80-$200 billion a year .

The end of the spiraling cost would free up money the opiate crisis, homelessness and infrastructure .

#2 Prosecute the deep state intelligence network.

The necessity for that goes without saying. Weed out the career officials that subvert the Constitution and abuse
their positions be it Democrat or Republican. I rarely if ever say this,....but their actions to topple trump make it clear they are a threat to our republic.


#3 attack the opioid crisis on a large scale .

Fortunately this is a two for one with the wall . When ( not if ) the wall is built it will help cut down the flow of fentanyl and heroin coming across the border .

#4 Infrastructure

First of all we need it . Secondly it’s going to put half of the Democrats in a box . Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer said they’re willing to work with Trump on infrastructure. Normally I would think that was just lipservice.

But I think the geriatric Democrat leadership ( except Maxine she doesn’t understand anything lol) realize the political consequences for opposing infrastructure. The leadership’s problem will be the angry progressive liberals who will do anything to oppose Trump .

Both sides of that party realize this would be part of trumps legacy and will create a huge number of jobs . It will still be remembered in 50 years just like F.D.R’s.

The dinosaur Democrats would be willing to take that blow on the chin.

But the rabid radical left has such personal hatred for POTUS. I don’t believe they will allow it .

Their fantasy will be that the Democratic Party can do it after the 2020 election’s .


But I think if they killed the bill it will a golden ticket for 2020 .

#5 outside the intelligence community. Appoint a special prosecutor for Uranium one and Clinton‘s emails


If the the right man/woman is appointed . The Democrats in Congress won’t be able to interfere without putting on a obstruction of justice
T-shirt .




I got a little long-winded there sorry. Let’s hear what you guys have ?


edit on 29-4-2019 by Fallingdown because: (no reason given)

edit on 29-4-2019 by Fallingdown because: (no reason given)




posted on Apr, 29 2019 @ 08:45 PM
link   
a reply to: Fallingdown

I'd go with #1 and 2 at the same time... we can multitask.

After all, if we have no borders we don't have a sovereign nation and if we don't start applying equal justice for all then it's not worth having a sovereign nation.

Both are equally important, in my opinion.

So let's flush the FBI/DOJ/Deep State toilet and then close the door, as it were.




posted on Apr, 29 2019 @ 08:54 PM
link   
a reply to: Lumenari

Your choices say something about you .

Which is we need to protect the republic from all attacks . Protect our sovereignty and defend the Constitution .

Duty, honor, country .

Sounds like you already have duty and honor in spades .

I like that thanks for replying .



posted on Apr, 29 2019 @ 08:58 PM
link   
a reply to: Fallingdown


I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law.


All Americans should feel this way.




posted on Apr, 29 2019 @ 09:00 PM
link   
a reply to: Fallingdown

We should go for a trench rather than a wall. Trenches are lot cheaper!


edit on 29-4-2019 by dfnj2015 because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 29 2019 @ 09:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: Lumenari
a reply to: Fallingdown

I'd go with #1 and 2 at the same time... we can multitask.

After all, if we have no borders we don't have a sovereign nation and if we don't start applying equal justice for all then it's not worth having a sovereign nation.

Both are equally important, in my opinion.

So let's flush the FBI/DOJ/Deep State toilet and then close the door, as it were.



Completely agree, we need to do 1&2 together for a number of reasons, one being that #2 is fighting with all they got to prevent #1.

Good job OP.



posted on Apr, 29 2019 @ 09:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: Fallingdown

We should go for a trench rather than a wall. Trenches are lot cheaper!



A trench that provides the same security as a wall would be much more costly. But if it did and was cheaper to build and maintain I’m all in.



posted on Apr, 29 2019 @ 09:25 PM
link   
a reply to: dfnj2015

we have a trench, its called the Rio Grande, and its not working. In fact we need to save a number of illegals from drowning.

OP, Im all about digging into Uranium 1, Clinton Foundation, Clinton Global Initiative, AGT, and emails...along with all of those who took part in Hillary and Obamas criminal activity.


edit on 29-4-2019 by BlueJacket because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 29 2019 @ 09:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: Fallingdown

We should go for a trench rather than a wall. Trenches are lot cheaper!



I want a "functional wall" which consists of stacked giant pipes that will pump sea-water to the desert for solar desalination and algae oil farms.



posted on Apr, 29 2019 @ 09:34 PM
link   
Democrats are opposed to every single item on your list. They don’t want to do anything that is god for American citizens.



posted on Apr, 29 2019 @ 09:35 PM
link   
a reply to: dfnj2015

Trumps been playing head games on wall funding. He’s treating it like a business negotiation. This is from memory but I think during the campaign he said he needed around 50 billion.

Then he dropped it to 25 billion .

I figured he was dickering for around 12 billion .

I was wrong and if he had been selling me a car I would’ve paid waaaay to much .

At this point I’m pretty sure all he needs is somewhere around 6 billion and he’s not going to budge.

If the Democrats end up giving him all 6 billion. They can claim a victory because they can’t say they negotiated him down from 25 billion .

The way I look at it those tactics sweetened the pot for tweedle dee and tweedle dumb which gave them a way out .
edit on 29-4-2019 by Fallingdown because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 29 2019 @ 09:42 PM
link   
a reply to: Fallingdown

#5, no question about it.

I want to see her roasted and then thrown into a cell to cough to death, slowly and cut off from the outside world.



posted on Apr, 29 2019 @ 09:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: Metallicus
Democrats are opposed to every single item on your list. They don’t want to do anything that is god for American citizens.


Most of them are priorities to the American people.

But I agree with your statement with the exception of the opiate crisis .

My philosophy is keep giving them rope for 2020 .



posted on Apr, 29 2019 @ 10:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: r0xor
a reply to: Fallingdown

#5, no question about it.

I want to see her roasted and then thrown into a cell to cough to death, slowly and cut off from the outside world.


trump has had plenty of time to have her indited by his hand picked AGs.....what's the hold up? It's been 2 years since he made the promise to "lock her up"

And the wall 2 years in...

www.factcheck.org...
edit on 29-4-2019 by olaru12 because: (no reason given)


www.bbc.com...
edit on 29-4-2019 by olaru12 because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 30 2019 @ 01:37 AM
link   

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: r0xor
a reply to: Fallingdown

#5, no question about it.

I want to see her roasted and then thrown into a cell to cough to death, slowly and cut off from the outside world.


trump has had plenty of time to have her indited by his hand picked AGs.....what's the hold up? It's been 2 years since he made the promise to "lock her up"

And the wall 2 years in...

www.factcheck.org...

www.bbc.com...


You know exactly what the holdup is on the wall why are you asking ?

It’s all about funding the Democrats don’t want to give us any.

Liberals call the wall inmmoral because it keeps illegal immigrants out.

Yet they applaud Nancy and Chuck’s solution of drones and more cameras which also keep people out.

That kind of hypocrisy shows the only political position Democrats have is butthurt .

Your first link was from a year ago. A lot is changed since then. Replacement of dilapidated fencing and new construction is underway as we speak .

www.constructiondive.com...


We’re even moving back towards parts of the border being a concrete wall because the price is coming down . 234 miles of concrete border wall for $1.4 billion . At that price the entire wall would cost around $10 billion .



North Dakota contractor says his company can build a 234-mile barrier system along the U.S.-Mexico border for $1.4 billion, significantly less than the $8 billion President Donald Trump is trying to cobble together by declaring a national emergency at the border, the Washington Examiner reported.
Fisher Sand and Gravel CEO Tommy Fisher told the Examiner that his price includes 20 miles of levee wall in the Rio Grande Valley of Texas, plus another 214 miles of border wall.

Fisher added that his company could deliver that section of wall, plus paved roads, border technology and a warranty for $4.3 billion.

Fisher told the Examiner that his offer was meant to “break through government bureaucracy” and that the Customs and Border Protection's plans to split the wall into multiple small awards was “not going to cut it.”


Fisher has given previous estimates of between almost $11 billion and $12 billion for 700 miles of a cast-in-place concrete wall along the U.S. border with Mexico. The company was also one of the contractors chosen in August 2017 to build a concrete border wall prototype in San Diego.


www.constructiondive.com...


Now on to Hillary.

Hillary‘s indictment wouldn’t come until after the probe into corruption/favoritism at the FBI. The probe might possibly turn into a full-scale investigation on why the Trump campaign was targeted and why Hillary Clinton received preferential treatment .

Plus John Huber is conducting probably the most secretive investigation in decades. Here’s an article from April 2019 no one‘s heard a peep out of him .

That kind of silence freaks people out on both sides of the issue . But the way I read it is they’re taking it very seriously .

www.washingtontimes.com...



I think there’s an old saying that fits Hillary and the FBI traitors position well .

“ you know you’re in trouble when the drama stops “

Unlike you we want justice not instant gratification. I’m willing to wait .



posted on Apr, 30 2019 @ 01:40 AM
link   
a reply to: Fallingdown




Liberals call the wall inmmoral because it keeps illegal immigrants out.

I would say that's more the socialist outlook, if anything.

Me, I just think it's stupid. Money could be better spent.

Of course, Congress could try to actually do something about the law. Republicans had a couple of years, free reign. What happened?


edit on 4/30/2019 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 30 2019 @ 02:39 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Hypocrisy

More money will be saved as opposed to putting 100,000 people a month on public support .


More butthurt from a Anti Trump republican senator along with every seething whining Democrat . Who were happy to keep illegal immigrants out with cameras/drones but not a wall/fence . They also didn’t have any problem with letting Fentanyl and heroin in to kill Americans. All because they lost an election and “orange man is bad”.


The Senate was voting Friday on whether to consider the House spending bill that designates $5.7 billion for a border wall. The motion required a simple majority to pass, but Sen. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., voted no, giving Republicans a maximum of 50 votes, though Vice President Mike Pence could break a tie. The vote, which stood at 43 in favor, 45 opposed by midafternoon, was being held open for several senators who had already left town and were trying to return. If it fails, it makes a partial government shutdown almost certain.
If the motion passes, the Senate will hold a cloture vote on the spending bill. The cloture vote requires 60 “yeas”—a near impossibility for Republicans who have a 51-seat majority. President Donald Trump met with Senate leaders Friday morning but appeared to stand firm on his promise not to sign a spending bill unless it included the wall funding he demanded. Friday morning, he laid blame for the seemingly inevitable government shutdown at Democrats’ feet, tweeting, “The Democrats now own the shutdown!”


I get so tired of hearing that silly question . It’s 53 to 47 now the next time it comes up guess what’s going to happen .

[url]https://world.wng.org/content/budget_talks_come_down_to_the_wire[url]



posted on Apr, 30 2019 @ 06:16 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Fallingdown




Liberals call the wall inmmoral because it keeps illegal immigrants out.


Republicans had a couple of years, free reign. What happened?



Don’t insult your own intelligence, you know that’s not true. The D’s in the Senate held up any progress. As you know you need 60 yea votes in the Senate to pass legislation. Why the subterfuge?



posted on Apr, 30 2019 @ 07:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: Fallingdown
a reply to: dfnj2015

Trumps been playing head games on wall funding. He’s treating it like a business negotiation. This is from memory but I think during the campaign he said he needed around 50 billion.

Then he dropped it to 25 billion .

I figured he was dickering for around 12 billion .

I was wrong and if he had been selling me a car I would’ve paid waaaay to much .

At this point I’m pretty sure all he needs is somewhere around 6 billion and he’s not going to budge.

If the Democrats end up giving him all 6 billion. They can claim a victory because they can’t say they negotiated him down from 25 billion .

The way I look at it those tactics sweetened the pot for tweedle dee and tweedle dumb which gave them a way out .


I think the money would be better spent on infrastructure or job training. The problem with a wall is the Mexicans are really smart about figuring out ways around it. The little bastards are sneaky. We have 14 million illegals working in this country. The people hiring these illegals absolutely love the cheap slave labor! Maybe a better approach is to seize all of someone's assets if they hire illegals. If we are going to have anarchy we might as well go for it!




edit on 30-4-2019 by dfnj2015 because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 30 2019 @ 12:30 PM
link   
a reply to: dfnj2015

Can we fill it with something deadly ?



new topics

top topics



 
10
<<   2 >>

log in

join