NYT Op-Ed uses sexism and name calling to defend Cortez and socialism

After a week of anti-Semitic cartoons, the NYT thought that defending socialism through sexist remarks would be the high road to travel.

Guys? We just don't get or understand socialism because Cortez is a babe.

That's it.

That's all there is.

She's just too "hawt" for us to understand the authoritarian nature of her ideology.

Jesus H Christ.

SMDH

www.diogenesmiddlefinger.com...

Oh, Credit the above for the thought. . . .

a reply to: DBCowboy

Really, I’m starting to wonder if those fake media outlets were created by Artificial Intelligence and designed to keep us human beings in complete ignorance.

There’s no way a real person writes this thing.

And people actually BUY this!

It’s unbelievable, man.

a reply to: DBCowboy

What a disgrace.

Just imagine if this was reversed about any male politician or otherwise and women resenting him because of his looks and 'cleverness' (I would personally use the word intelligence but hey). There would be those oh so annoying protests in the street by idiots whose whole argument can fit on a piece of cardboard.

Just another in a line of countless double standards when it comes to the whole gender divide.

Note; women do not have a default position of moral superiority over men.

Just have to ride this out a few more years.

We are literally at the end of a large portion of the mainstream media, these ever increasing and ridiculous outbursts are nothing but death throes.

NYT
"sickly obsession"
I can see that English (grammar) is not their primary language
To me , that negates anything said.
Early on.

a reply to: DBCowboy

Resents her cleverness, charisma and moral vitality?

Buhahahaha!!!

Fox just puts her buggy-eyed face on the news because she represents exactly how far the left has wandered into crazytown and it sells to normal Americans.

You know, like footage of a train wreck does.

But hey... at least the NYT has risen above the Holocaust deniers they used to be, so they have worked their way up to just sucking.

"Moral vitality"?

Far be it from the NYT to start making s# up.

Wait...

a reply to: DBCowboy

After a week of anti-Semitic cartoons, the NYT thought that defending socialism through sexist remarks would be the high road to travel.

It's the NYT what do you expect from that trash rag? As far as AOC being "hawt" she always reminds me of the demon llama from "The Emperors New Groove."

@nytopinion ....

here's your mirror images:

Before

After

anytime

a reply to: DBCowboy

I wonder why the right is so obsessed... seriously

I got laundry to do, sammies to make, and floors to scrub, as well as a sausage to smoke (wink wink, nudge nudge) but I don't really see an issue with a sexist jab. Can't be all that hard to crack open a beer and a toolbox, and move on, is it?

originally posted by: odzeandennz
a reply to: DBCowboy

I wonder why the right is so obsessed... seriously

I'd say because her ideas and ideology represent the biggest threat to US and subsequently Western democracy at present. This is a girl old Koba aka Stalin would be proud to count amongst one of his own.

Did I mention she is also dangerously unqualified intellectually and by credentials for the position she holds and won her way in based purely off BS populism and identity politics?

I'm neither left nor right or centre or anything else you can identify as.

I can still spot a dangerous idiot from a few thousand miles away though

It’s funny because that’s the EXACT reason why EVERY leftist doesn’t like the president.

His looks and his intelligence.

And they can’t dispute that because it’s not up to them to decide ‘why’ they don’t like someone. It’s up to the media and the President’s supporters.

Or does that way of thinking belong solely to the libtarded??

originally posted by: odzeandennz
a reply to: DBCowboy

I wonder why the right is so obsessed... seriously

Well seriously maybe because 1) by their own statements the NYT has admitted it can no longer be an objective news outlet in the times of Trump and 2) AOC really comes across as dumb as a stump most of the time. She simply embodies the meme of stupid, over educated and illiterate millennial. Honestly if I was her I'd be demanding a refund from whatever college ripped her off for those credentials they gave her. Especially the economics degree.

a reply to: IAMALLYETALLIAM

Cortez actually scares me, not so much because she's an idiot, but because so many believe in her.

She's "She Guevara", she's Hitler in heels.

Idiots and morons will always be idiots and morons, but when they get a following. . . . that's when they become dangerous.

She's a STAR !!!!!!!!!!!! 😄

a reply to: odzeandennz

its not so much the right, as any sane person recognizes her absurd notions for what they are.

a reply to: IAMALLYETALLIAM


My problem with her is that she is handled. Those ideas are fed to her and she can't explain them when asked to. Her tweets are written by someone else because when she speaks without help, she is incoherent. Her intellect is non-existent and she is an actress scripted by a group with an ulterior motive. Maybe she was a token minority pushed though college.