It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Booms, Just Cloaked Aerial vehicle breaking the Sound barrier .

page: 2
9
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 28 2019 @ 08:49 AM
link   
a reply to: 2hooitconcerns

No, I am asking you to reference the booms you are speaking of. Location, volume of noise, did windows shatter, eye witness accounts, that sort of stuff. You know, the foundation of good research....

Maybe you need more coffee. You aren’t making any sense.




posted on Apr, 28 2019 @ 08:53 AM
link   

originally posted by: 2hooitconcerns
a reply to: roadgravel

I stated my opinion , how you read it is down to you


You stated opinion as fact. Some day you might understand. Moving on.



posted on Apr, 28 2019 @ 09:00 AM
link   
a reply to: 2hooitconcerns

Do you wanna know where they got their cloaking tech? They got it from China and i can prove it. Go outside and look up in the sky. Do you see any Chinese fighter jets? No? That’s because they are cloaked.



posted on Apr, 28 2019 @ 09:08 AM
link   
a reply to: Doodle19815

I think you are the one needing the coffee.

My reply was to InhaleExhale , although i did not use the correct reply function, most here would have understood who i was replying to..

And i will reply here to InhaleExhale,

He is still wondering why i said have another go lol.

heres what he asked.

" Never heard of reports being 1000s of years old of UFOs not being seen.

can you post example of what you are talking about?

Both the sounds and these 1000 year old report of invisible aerial craft? "

Ok Let me spell out your Logic.

How can one make a report of something you cant see, ahhh now the penny drops.

Make a black cup, you too Doodle



posted on Apr, 28 2019 @ 09:11 AM
link   
a reply to: Woodcarver

Can Chinese Jet fighters reach the US, oh yea their refueling planes were also cloaked lol


Maybe an advanced version of Active Camouflage en.m.wikipedia.org...
edit on 28-4-2019 by 2hooitconcerns because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 28 2019 @ 09:45 AM
link   
a reply to: Woodcarver

Troll trolling the troll. Love it!



posted on Apr, 28 2019 @ 09:57 AM
link   
There are a couple flaws with your initial theory. The first is that a sonic boom can be heard hundreds of miles away. Secondary effects from a Concorde sonic boom test were felt something like 1800 miles away, under perfect conditions. So the aircraft leaving that boom, if it's heard in California, could be a hundred plus miles away, where it won't be seen.

The second is that "cloaking" and visual stealth aren't the same thing. Visual stealth has been worked on for several decades, and was successfully flown in 2006 on a small scale. The problem with it is that it doesn't work on high speed platforms. Aircraft that can break the sound barrier tend to heat up a lot. The panels that attach to the skin, to allow for the visual stealth, tend to not stay attached under those conditions.



posted on Apr, 28 2019 @ 10:27 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: 2hooitconcerns

who is still talking about booms?
Booms were so 2015.


They are happening frequently in NE Ohio in the last few months, so yeah. Problem is that they seem to be pretty localized. My sister-in-law lives in Brookfield Ohio and they reported several booms a couple of months ago however I'm only about 10 miles away and did not hear the booms.
edit on 28-4-2019 by panoz77 because: Added info



posted on Apr, 28 2019 @ 10:28 AM
link   
a reply to: 2hooitconcerns




Ok Let me spell out your Logic. How can one make a report of something you cant see, ahhh now the penny drops.


Um, yes that is what my questions were implying.

you were the one who said this quoted below





Well who knows who's inside these Aerial Vehicles , if we go down the UFO phenomena then there are reports / " LEGENDS " of Aerial Vehicles thousands of years ago, Why is Cloaking Silly, Do you think future science won't be able to produce working cloaking technology




For the 3rd time can you explain what booms you are referring too?

Can you link to any recordings? where are you getting these ideas from, do you hear these booms or is it something you have read or heard about from a video or site you can maybe link too so readers can understand where you are coming from?

Someone posted videos of the booms that have been discussed for the last decade or so, you said it wasn't the same.




posted on Apr, 28 2019 @ 10:31 AM
link   
a reply to: Zaphod58

Yes of course you are talking about common known aircraft then there would be vast distances involved between the two events, but how many eye witness accounts have there been of ariel objects doing 90 degree turns instantaneously , so someone has got advanced technology,and maybe we have acquired the same by whatever means.

So following on from the idea that your government has acquired some very advanced technology from who knows where and when , then cloaking technology might be easy peasy to whoever it was acquired from, they then adapted it to their fighter planes , or vehicles that look like the common UFO, the odd thing is that no one seems to report Booms with UFO's.

It all points to us guys messing around with new toys.

PS , Just speculating .



posted on Apr, 28 2019 @ 10:41 AM
link   
a reply to: InhaleExhale

www.youtube.com...
edit on 28-4-2019 by 2hooitconcerns because: (no reason given)



Hmmm, could have been a Thunder Clap ?
edit on 28-4-2019 by 2hooitconcerns because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 28 2019 @ 10:46 AM
link   

originally posted by: 2hooitconcerns
a reply to: InhaleExhale

www.youtube.com...


from the comments:
...unfortunately over the last 18 months most of the UK has heard these sonic booms because of our RAF responding to possible terrorist threats in the way of air craft not identifying them selves or not communicating with air traffic control. When this happens a QRA is given (Quick Reaction Alert) to one or two of our RAF basses (RAF Conningsby or RAF Lossiemouth), sometimes both. At that point Euro Fighter Typhoons are scrambled to intercept. This happened last summer www.youtube.com... near where I live and I was tracking two Typhoons out of RAF Conningsby on 360radar! It was latter confirmed by the RAF!



posted on Apr, 28 2019 @ 11:09 AM
link   

originally posted by: 2hooitconcerns
a reply to: InhaleExhale

www.youtube.com...


So your examples of these booms happening predominately in the US is a video from 3 years ago in the UK and at night time hence why maybe the planes cannot be seen?

Reading your OP I thought you were talking about Booms that have been discussed for quite some time now,

Sky trumpets as some were calling them, many before 2012 were saying they were an indication of the end of the world meant to happen in 2012, some sounded like sonic booms others like thunder from a distance.

So you are actually talking about sonic booms being heard in the US, is this recent?




but how many eye witness accounts have there been of ariel objects doing 90 degree turns instantaneously


would there be any if the craft are cloaked as you claim?

So if you are talking about sonic booms being heard in the US recently are there any reports, have you been hearing them?



posted on Apr, 28 2019 @ 11:41 AM
link   
We had some pretty serious booms a couple of weeks ago to the extent that people on our local channel were saying WTF? a lot. Turns out the Rez five miles down the road was celebrating opening a new part of their casino and shot off some "salutes" as part of the show. "Salutes" are fireworks without the pretty pictures in the sky. They just go "Boom!" Because it's so heavily forested in our area there is no horizon and we couldn't see up that far North. They sounded very close,hence the local angst, but they really were no big deal. "Booms" could be anything. Not worth worrying about.



posted on Apr, 28 2019 @ 12:22 PM
link   
It's the 'invisible' UFOs that make no noise and can't be seen similar to the one that collided with a vehicle in Illinois in 2014.


However, don''t know for sure, but I believe that what people are hearing are the next generation of SR-71 similar devices that use the latest technology to not only lessen their radar cross section but also reduce their sight picture to overcome video recognition from both surface and earth orbit. Most if not all are unmanned and provide near instantaneous info to satellites.

Disclaimer: YMMV...
edit on 4/28/2019 by NightFlight because: 2 many EEEEs in the... not to be confused with lefty's REEEEEEEEEEEEEs!



posted on Apr, 28 2019 @ 01:07 PM
link   
I thought aircraft breaking the sound barrier not only produce the boom, but also leave a trail of broken windows as well as a visual distortion around the aircraft, especially at lower altitudes.



posted on Apr, 28 2019 @ 01:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: NightFlight
It's the 'invisible' UFOs that make no noise and can't be seen similar to the one that collided with a vehicle in Illinois in 2014.


However, don''t know for sure, but I believe that what people are hearing are the next generation of SR-71 similar devices that use the latest technology to not only lessen their radar cross section but also reduce their sight picture to overcome video recognition from both surface and earth orbit. Most if not all are unmanned and provide near instantaneous info to satellites.

Disclaimer: YMMV...


Can we get some citations with proper nouns, rather than pronouns?

Either way, this story seems a bit iff.
(Lurched to the right for no reason.) She would have probably mentioned hearing the impact thud or boom, if something physically hit the vehicle. Whether the impacting object was invisible or not, her car Isn't made of super advanced technology. She would have heard those panels cave in.

My best guess here is a little more logical.

The damage to the side of the vehicle probably happened before she even got in it to drive. If you enter your vehicle in a dark parking deck, garage, or dark carport, you may not notice damage if you're in a hurry. If another car was parked in the space next to it, your brain wouldn't even think about checking for damage on that particular side of the vehicle.

All that aside, she also could have just been looking at her smartphone, while getting into her vehicle to drive.

The sudden lurch she describes could have been caused by the pre-existing damage + a wind gust.
That much damage would absolutely change the aerodynamics of the vehicle. She would have unexpected lurching.

As for what would create that type of damage to a stationary vehicle? Who knows, but I would imagine a UFO that is advanced enough to be completely optically invisible would have a tiny bit of super advanced collision detection and deterrent.



posted on Apr, 28 2019 @ 01:27 PM
link   
a reply to: 2hooitconcerns

Which doesn't rule out advanced conventional aircraft. A sharp turn like that is well within the capabilities of some aircraft. Just because people aren't recognizing what they're seeing doesn't mean we have ET spaceships reverse engineered. It's nowhere near as simple as people think to copy even designs at similar technology levels.



posted on Apr, 28 2019 @ 01:30 PM
link   
a reply to: Archivalist

I also remember seeing a picture of a vehicle with very, very heavy front end damage not unlike a head-on collision. The driver, who lived, stated that there was nothing there, nothing in the road and the driver was doing 55 to 60 MPH. That picture (and accompanying story) could not be quickly located and I am still searching. That's the picture I wanted to post but have not found it - yet...

Havin' fun!



posted on Apr, 28 2019 @ 01:33 PM
link   
a reply to: DJMSN

The only visual distortion is caused when there's a lot of humidity in the air. It's caused by the pressure difference around the aircraft. Contrary to popular belief, it's not always an indication of a supersonic aircraft. It happens when the aircraft is transonic, and can happen to any aircraft.

As for the windows, it depends on the aircraft and the shockwave it produces.




top topics



 
9
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join