It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: BlackJackal
originally posted by: Lumenari
a reply to: BlackJackal
You have to ask yourself, are you an American or are you Trump's dog?
I'm an American and we are doing better under Trump than the last asshat, tyvm.
Trump's dog as a slur is kinda funny, coming from someone named Jackal...
So to rephrase your last line, I'm an American and who's bitch are you?
woof woof. I expected you to be nothing more than a dog. Logic never touches your mind.
Of all the times you and I have had discussions you have proven to be nothing but an emotional creature controlled by your feelings rather than knowledge or facts.
originally posted by: Tartuffe
originally posted by: BlackJackal
This is a very quick video. However, it does a good job overviewing the findings of the Mueller Report. Not the lies that Bill Barr spread. Not Bill Barr's interpretation of the law. The actual report itself.
Link
You have to ask yourself, are you an American or are you Trump's dog?
When you can’t explain it yourself, look for someone who tells you what you want to hear and get in line behind them. Pure confirmation bias. You’ve found your alpha. What does that make you?
originally posted by: rickymouse
He was a Tv judge for some years, similar to Judge Judy. He was a real judge for a while, but he went back to being a lawyer and then an actor. He probably has sour grapes against Trump because he was told Trump would consider him for the Supreme court job but he didn't. Well, all the nerve of Trump, one actor not supporting another actor being put into a high position.
Maybe the Supreme court should review Mueller's report and give us a real determination of what it legally says. This guy in the video went around in circles and said little of nothing, typical lawyer tactics. He is smart enough not to say something outright, most people who work with law and politics know you skirt everything, not saying anything positively. Answering questions with questions. I think they teach that at predominant colleges.
Fourth, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President
clearly did not commit obstruction of justice , we would so state. Based on the facts and the
applicable legal standards , however , we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we
obtained about the President ' s actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from
conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does
not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: MALBOSIA
originally posted by: BlackJackal
This is a very quick video. However, it does a good job overviewing the findings of the Mueller Report. Not the lies that Bill Barr spread. Not Bill Barr's interpretation of the law. The actual report itself.
Link
You have to ask yourself, are you an American or are you Trump's dog?
Well if you voted Democrat in the last election, you didn't think smashing a cell phone to conceal evidence was obstruction enough to sway you so why do think that Trumps supposed obstruction that pales in comparison would sway his voters?
Trumps Dog? That's low and pathetic
It was government procedure to wipe and destroy cell 'phones and tablets that may have contained secret data and were no longer in use.
No 'phones, that existed after the time they were subpoena'd, were destroyed. All phones capable of being surrendered, were.
There was no deliberate attempt to hide data from the investigators (although data that had been requested was deleted by accident due to miscommunication and IT support incompetence).
originally posted by: Lumenari
originally posted by: BlackJackal
originally posted by: Lumenari
a reply to: BlackJackal
You have to ask yourself, are you an American or are you Trump's dog?
I'm an American and we are doing better under Trump than the last asshat, tyvm.
Trump's dog as a slur is kinda funny, coming from someone named Jackal...
So to rephrase your last line, I'm an American and who's bitch are you?
woof woof. I expected you to be nothing more than a dog. Logic never touches your mind.
Of all the times you and I have had discussions you have proven to be nothing but an emotional creature controlled by your feelings rather than knowledge or facts.
Quoted for the God level of irony that your post invokes.
You've never posted an actual fact that I've ever seen.
CNN talking points, Voxx, Mother Jones.
There is nothing that you have ever posted politically that I've ever read that isn't fueled by TDS.
That you can't see that and don't understand that is why you are so amusing to me that I reply to you.
It isn't woof woof, sweety... it's just me kicking the puppy.
originally posted by: Tartuffe
originally posted by: BlackJackal
This is a very quick video. However, it does a good job overviewing the findings of the Mueller Report. Not the lies that Bill Barr spread. Not Bill Barr's interpretation of the law. The actual report itself.
Link
You have to ask yourself, are you an American or are you Trump's dog?
When you can’t explain it yourself, look for someone who tells you what you want to hear and get in line behind them. Pure confirmation bias. You’ve found your alpha. What does that make you?
originally posted by: thov420
a reply to: BlackJackal
In this country nobody has to prove their innocence. Innocent until proven guilty. Seriously, what's so hard to understand about that?
originally posted by: BlackJackal
originally posted by: Tartuffe
originally posted by: BlackJackal
This is a very quick video. However, it does a good job overviewing the findings of the Mueller Report. Not the lies that Bill Barr spread. Not Bill Barr's interpretation of the law. The actual report itself.
Link
You have to ask yourself, are you an American or are you Trump's dog?
When you can’t explain it yourself, look for someone who tells you what you want to hear and get in line behind them. Pure confirmation bias. You’ve found your alpha. What does that make you?
Have you read the report or have you just listened to the news? You see I have read the report, three times so far. I provide the video because for some reason unless it comes from Fox News people on the right wing have this odd habit of screaming "Fake News" at the top of their lungs while sticking their heads in the dirt.
If you have read the report this should be super simple to answer. Who was the first member of the Trump campaign to learn that Russia had Clinton's emails and wanted to give them to the campaign?
originally posted by: Tartuffe
originally posted by: BlackJackal
originally posted by: Tartuffe
originally posted by: BlackJackal
This is a very quick video. However, it does a good job overviewing the findings of the Mueller Report. Not the lies that Bill Barr spread. Not Bill Barr's interpretation of the law. The actual report itself.
Link
You have to ask yourself, are you an American or are you Trump's dog?
When you can’t explain it yourself, look for someone who tells you what you want to hear and get in line behind them. Pure confirmation bias. You’ve found your alpha. What does that make you?
Have you read the report or have you just listened to the news? You see I have read the report, three times so far. I provide the video because for some reason unless it comes from Fox News people on the right wing have this odd habit of screaming "Fake News" at the top of their lungs while sticking their heads in the dirt.
If you have read the report this should be super simple to answer. Who was the first member of the Trump campaign to learn that Russia had Clinton's emails and wanted to give them to the campaign?
Then you know the conclusion of the investigation.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: BlackJackal
In May of 2017, Napolitano was intimidated/threatened/coerced by Intelligence Agency operatives, into his current (mostly) anti-Trump stance on most issues.
Thankfully President Trump isn't intimidated by them, and Thankfully President Trump is the one who holds the power and has the will to get the "deep state" crooks.
The evidence we
obtained about the President ' s actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from
conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does
not conclude that the President committed a crime, ...
originally posted by: BlackJackal
originally posted by: Tartuffe
originally posted by: BlackJackal
originally posted by: Tartuffe
originally posted by: BlackJackal
This is a very quick video. However, it does a good job overviewing the findings of the Mueller Report. Not the lies that Bill Barr spread. Not Bill Barr's interpretation of the law. The actual report itself.
Link
You have to ask yourself, are you an American or are you Trump's dog?
When you can’t explain it yourself, look for someone who tells you what you want to hear and get in line behind them. Pure confirmation bias. You’ve found your alpha. What does that make you?
Have you read the report or have you just listened to the news? You see I have read the report, three times so far. I provide the video because for some reason unless it comes from Fox News people on the right wing have this odd habit of screaming "Fake News" at the top of their lungs while sticking their heads in the dirt.
If you have read the report this should be super simple to answer. Who was the first member of the Trump campaign to learn that Russia had Clinton's emails and wanted to give them to the campaign?
Then you know the conclusion of the investigation.
So you accuse me of not understanding the report when you yourself haven't read it? I will give you one more chance to think for yourself. What do you think the conclusion of the Mueller report was?
Does he give the actual conclusion or does he just regurgitate what the right-wing media is purporting to be the truth?
I'm pulling for you.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: BlackJackal
In May of 2017, Napolitano was intimidated/threatened/coerced by Intelligence Agency operatives, into his current (mostly) anti-Trump stance on most issues.
Thankfully President Trump isn't intimidated by them, and Thankfully President Trump is the one who holds the power and has the will to get the "deep state" crooks.
The impeached official remains in office until a trial is held. That trial, and their removal from office if convicted, is separate from the act of impeachment itself.
originally posted by: BlackJackal
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: BlackJackal
In May of 2017, Napolitano was intimidated/threatened/coerced by Intelligence Agency operatives, into his current (mostly) anti-Trump stance on most issues.
Thankfully President Trump isn't intimidated by them, and Thankfully President Trump is the one who holds the power and has the will to get the "deep state" crooks.
You have proof of that claim or is this just another of your conspiracy theories that someone on some board thought sounded good?
This report lays out a case against Trump that has ample evidence to bring a case against him for obstruction of justice. However, since he is the president the DOJ has a policy which prevents the DOJ from indicting him.
originally posted by: RadioRobert
a reply to: BlackJackal
It's amazing that you can actually post this and think this is proof some criminal act occurred...
The evidence we
obtained about the President ' s actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from
conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does
not conclude that the President committed a crime, ...
I mean, hey, I'm sure a talking head on TV will tell you what you want to hear and what they "really" meant though...
Accordingly, while this report does
not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him