It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: scraedtosleep
I have no problem with border control.
But why spend that money when you can curtail illegal immigration and make a profit?
If you actually start fining companies that hire illegals and legalize marijuana, the government will counter a lot of reasons illegal immigrants cross the border and at the same time make money.
originally posted by: Edumakated
I'm curious if younger people realize how stupid they sound always asking for free sh*t like money grows on trees.
Everybody else sees it.
link
In 1987, public colleges received three times more revenue funding per-student from state and local governments than from tuition, according to an analysis published Thursday by Peter Hinrichs, a senior research economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland. But by 2013, the amount of money public schools received from tuition was roughly the same as what the schools brought in from state and local governments.
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: CriticalStinker
If you were running on these ideas I'd vote for you.
It's a frivolous racket and it doesn't have to be.
Trump laid out a student loan repayment plan in a speech in Ohio on October 13, 2016. He said, “We would cap repayment for an affordable portion of the borrower’s income, 12.5 percent, we’d cap it. That gives you a lot to play with and a lot to do. And if borrowers work hard and make their full payments for 15 years, we’ll let them get on with their lives. They just go ahead and they get on with their lives. … Students should not be asked to pay more on the debt than they can afford. And the debt should not be an albatross around their necks for the rest of their lives.
Apr 16, 2014 · In 2005, a group of anonymous donors in Kalamazoo launched a bold program. It pays for graduates of the city's public schools to attend any of Michigan's public universities or community colleges.
originally posted by: CriticalStinker
originally posted by: Edumakated
I'm curious if younger people realize how stupid they sound always asking for free sh*t like money grows on trees.
Everybody else sees it.
State funded schools. They could be reformed to be reasonable, we already pay for them.
If someone makes double the income, they pay more taxes, they consume more goods. Some of them would end up on welfare (edit: end up on welfare without school) .
This could be done to where it wouldn't be free. It would be a system in which we demanded schools who take government money to accept kids with good grades without forcing a mortgage sized debt on them.
It wouldn't have to be free.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: Edumakated
Our current education system definitely isn't set up to allow anyone from any class or socio-economic background to go to college. It's set up to allow either the rich or the wealthy to go to college.
I'm reasonably smart. I had a 3.5 GPA. Got a 1450 on the SATs. I came from an upper middle class family. And yet I didn't get any scholarships and the only reason I could afford school is because I went in state.
In a European country, based on those credentials, i would've had my pick of school without having to worry about money.
Now imagine I'm someone with the same GPA and test scores but come from a poor family. Would I be better off in Europe or the US?
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
Universal healthcare also makes more sense from an economic sense because it leads to less sick days and higher productivity.
originally posted by: Edumakated
I'm curious if younger people realize how stupid they sound always asking for free sh*t like money grows on trees.
Everybody else sees it.