It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

What happened to crop circles, black triangles, and cattle mutilations?

page: 6
28
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 25 2019 @ 07:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: Waterglass
a reply to: yuppa


If you want to see a Black Triangle with engines. Its been flying in your direction around 5:15AM. It has no set pattern or day, week or month. Loudest jet engines I have ever heard as it will wake you up at night. I just blew it off since we moved here [Columbia] in June 2017 as I thought its was just a military cargo Plane or FEDEX or UPS. No. I finally got me arse out of bed to look at what it was last week and it was a true triangle. Each tip [corner] on the Triangle has a white strobe that slowly flashes along with a red light on top in the middle. Military [assuming it is such] didn't even attempt to cover up its silhouette.

I see most stuff from 5:00AM - 6:00AM. All dependent on location of Moon and clear sky.


I think the one i see is working with that one somehow,cause its around 5 30 or so when I see it in distance towards lake city.




posted on Apr, 26 2019 @ 09:51 AM
link   
a reply to: yuppa


I haven't heard it for 1 1/2 weeks but they don't always fly over the exact compass reading. However it always seems to come out over the North West horizon in alignment with Spartanburg to Columbia South Carolina and heads towards the ocean North of Columbia and in alignment with Myrtle Beach. They also do not seem to cloak the aircraft nor use flashing Yehudi style countermeasures. Other UFOs that I have seen down here including the "silent" triangles do. The pic [see below] was of a silent Triangle that flew directly over my home. No engine noise but its used Yehudi countermeasures.





Yehudi lights[a] are lamps of automatically-controlled brightness placed on the front and leading edges of an aircraft to raise the aircraft's luminance to the average brightness of the sky, a form of active camouflage using counter-illumination. They were designed to camouflage the aircraft by preventing it from appearing as a dark object against the sky. The technology was developed by the US Navy from 1943 onwards, to enable a sea-search aircraft to approach a surfaced submarine to "within 30 seconds of flying time"[1] before becoming visible to the submarine's crew. This in turn enabled the aircraft to engage the submarine with depth charges before it could dive, to counter the threat from German submarines to allied shipping. The concept was based on earlier research by the Royal Canadian Navy in its diffused lighting camouflage project. Yehudi lights did not come into operational usage and were considered obsolete with postwar advances in radar. With more recent improvements in stealth technology, Yehudi lights have again attracted interest.



edit on 26-4-2019 by Waterglass because: added

edit on 26-4-2019 by Waterglass because: added



posted on Apr, 26 2019 @ 10:19 AM
link   
a reply to: Waterglass

is the white light what your talking about??



posted on Apr, 27 2019 @ 07:54 AM
link   
a reply to: penroc3


Place your cursor on the pic and right click your mouse and then click on view image . It should blow it up if your using Windows 8.1 or later.

That's the moon. Look at 6:00. See the silhouette? I was taking a video and then I thought that it was simply a stealth bomber so I turned off the camera. So the object kept coming and flew right over my head. O n its belly were 100's of geometric shapes and projections that I could see with 20 / 70 vision with my glasses on. So when I realized it wasn't a Stealth Bomber I swung my arm around and snapped this pic. Not the best but its their and it made NO noise via engines.


edit on 27-4-2019 by Waterglass because: added

edit on 27-4-2019 by Waterglass because: added



posted on Apr, 30 2019 @ 10:39 PM
link   
[post]originally posted by: Arbitrageur
[post]originally posted by: 111DPKING111

There are varying opinions on the radar data and the retraction


There seems to be no dispute over this point about the radar data, nothing was seen, so there was no visual confirmation that anything was actually there (from your link):


What difference does it make? If he did see a flash of black dot, you could reply that could be anything. However multiple radars confirmed the sighting and the radars were checked for 55 minutes to confirm proper working order before sending aircraft up for interception. The military was putting its neck out on the line chasing this ufo and wanted to have their i's dotted.


Here's a weather radar showing a lot of rain that isn't happening, in a similar type of false signal. Radar experts know these things happen sometimes, but some people don't seem to be aware of it:


The military is aware of these things, and took nearly an hour to confirm the data before reacting.

"Excellent atmospheric conditions prevailed, and there was no possibility of false echoes due to temperature inversions"


Perhaps the technology of the UFO also interfered with the radar in some way, who knows what gravity propulsion would do to radar?


You may as well ask what fairie dust would do to radar since we have as much evidence for that as whatever you're talking about which sounds just as made up. Any known effects of gravity on radar are minimal. If you're talking about unknown effects, I put faerie dust in that category, I don't know what effect it would have.

Faerie dust has been around for quite some time, the stealth fighter rolled off the runway in 1981.


If it was just a blimp of sorts, why would any other country risk flying a slow moving object like that in someone elses territory? The US flew the SR-71 over the USSR because they knew it wouldnt be shot down, not the case with a blimp. The mostly likely culprit would be the Belgium military, yet we find them asking the US if it was them.



Or, maybe if some jets did a flyby and saw it was a blimp they might not shoot it down.

No military I am aware of operates under such wishful thinking, maybe things are different in your neck of the woods.


The officer sightings that Unsolved Mysteries covers in the Eupen video follows the path of one of the objects as it intersects 3 different sets of officers. Like good little skeptics, we find the officers are making light of the others till they wind up seeing it for themselves. At the last stop at La Calamine, the officers report the object seems to fold up and shoot off at high speeds, no ordinary blimp.


The shoot off at high speeds I would suppose is maybe an exaggeration similar to the "no noise" exaggeration


Heres the officers quote

Then another object was leaving the main object. It was a red light, pulsating and descending vertically from the object. It moved around the building." Then, incredibly, "the three lights at the corner of the platform shrank inwards so that the whole thing became a single circle of light and shot off into the distance faster than the eye could follow."


There were 2 officers who witnessed it fly off "faster than the eye could follow", who were just laughing minutes ago at the other officers over the ufo nonsense...

Think you are wasting your time here on the UFO forum though Arby. Multiple radar confirmation case, multiple sightings of the same object moving through 3 areas. Until that White House landing of a UFO happens, you might as well hang it up.
edit on 30-4-2019 by 111DPKING111 because: missed a quote tag



posted on May, 1 2019 @ 11:56 AM
link   
a reply to: Waterglass

can you draw an outline around it, might make it easier to see.



posted on May, 1 2019 @ 12:14 PM
link   
a reply to: penroc3

No, ATS now owns the rights to the picture. So you cant see it? Really? Well ATS must see it as they linked the pic to Google Images here so the entire world can see it. Assuming that the pic still remains as you will have to scroll down. The trouble is that everyone likes to spin a conspiracy; meaning the pic comes and goes from that web page. So here's a screen shot.



www.google.com... dafC3YQ_AUIECgD&biw=1920&bih=929



edit on 1-5-2019 by Waterglass because: added

edit on 1-5-2019 by Waterglass because: screen shot



posted on May, 1 2019 @ 12:29 PM
link   
a reply to: Waterglass

you can email it to me at penroc3@protonmail.com if you want.

i think i see it but im not sure if my eyes are playing tricks



FYI protonmail is one of the best secure emails there is



posted on May, 1 2019 @ 01:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: NightFlight
a reply to: RUokayHun

There is only one part of a cow the ETs like and its the filet. There just wasn't enough filet in an earth cow to have the cost of the life of one cow to just obtain the filet. Over the years cattle mutilations occurred to obtain DNA of the cows identified to have the largest filet. Such that, their science has produced an animal that is almost entirely filet mignon!
These cows were bred and raised on an ideal planet in the Antares system called Antares C, B-13. It is a smaller hilly planet with nothing but green GM grass pastures (the Antareans know how to do GM), clear nutritious running streams and a year round climate of 55 to 60 degrees F. Since the gravity is slightly less than earth's, the Antarean cows grow to an unbelievable average of 5 thousand earth pounds and more than 2/3 of the weight is filet. The taste of these filet are nothing short of god-like!


That was a fun read! Well done! Now, imagine what the Japanese could do with those cows. Massaged three times of day, pampered and totally Kobe.



edit on 5-1-2019 by LogicalGraphitti because: spelling



posted on May, 1 2019 @ 04:57 PM
link   
a reply to: penroc3


Try this one. I zoomed it up a little and put a circle around the object




posted on May, 1 2019 @ 08:43 PM
link   
a reply to: Waterglass

i see a fuzzy point in the light that could be the tip of a black tri.


they are hard to get pics of thats for sure, im not sure if they have some for of active countermeasure or if it is a by product of the way they work but they always come out blurry or as light blobs



posted on May, 2 2019 @ 05:39 AM
link   
a reply to: penroc3


That pic clarity was my screw up. That object flew right over me and my home. I was taking a video of it and then thought it was a Stealth Bomber so I stopped the video. Then as it went over me [totally silent] I looked at it and saw that it had a sort of triangular shape and had 100's of geometric projections on its belly. So I swung my arm around and snapped a pic as it flew between me and the Moon. The moons light disrupts the pic along with my swinging arm motion. I hope I get to see it again.

If you are looking at the pic you need to place your cursor on the pic and right hand click the pic with your mouse. The select "view image" and it will increase in size and view it. For now that's the best I can do.

edit on 2-5-2019 by Waterglass because: added



posted on May, 2 2019 @ 08:17 AM
link   
a reply to: Waterglass

i downloaded the pic and opened it is PS and GNU


i kind of see what your talking about but pics at night are hard under the best circumstances



posted on May, 2 2019 @ 08:42 AM
link   
a reply to: penroc3

They sure are. In my opinion the UFOs mimic Military or Commercial aircraft , follow their flight paths and do use countermeasures such as Yehudi lights to mess with the cameras or video. I turned all of my stuff over to a UFO group and they wrote back they are seeing Triangles in my pics and videos. I hope they release their investigative findings in public. Otherwise I will. I also told them that the pic was already given to ATS so they did not comment on it.



posted on May, 2 2019 @ 09:39 AM
link   
a reply to: Waterglass


originally posted by: penroc3
i kind of see what your talking about but pics at night are hard under the best circumstances
With older typical cameras that's true, but I think the cover that night used to provide for UFOs can be a thing of the past. If people are serious about trying to photograph UFOs at night they might want to consider using an ultra low light camera. The moon can provide a fair amount of light and with these ultra low light cameras, you don't need much light. Instead of old cameras which see less than your eyes at night, this camera can see more than your eyes can, at night.

Sony Ultra Low Light Ultra HD CCTV Camera


Example of view at night with ordinary camera.


Example of view at night with Sony Ultra Low Light camera.


edit on 201952 by Arbitrageur because: clarification



posted on May, 2 2019 @ 11:44 AM
link   
a reply to: Arbitrageur

holy smokes that's cool.


i can't imagine how much it costs.

but with time and demand the price will drop. i would rather buy that camera then drop some serious coin on a gen II or III night vision setup.



eta without any lens's its 8000$ link to cam
edit on 2-5-2019 by penroc3 because: link



posted on May, 2 2019 @ 01:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: penroc3
but with time and demand the price will drop.
It always seems to work that way, they will get more affordable. I wouldn't get one just yet, but maybe after the prices drop...


i would rather buy that camera then drop some serious coin on a gen II or III night vision setup.
That seems to make the night vision setups I've seen seem obsolete. At least the ones using infrared, which gives a somewhat distorted heat signature view, whereas the Sony ultra low light cam doesn't seem to be infrared based.

edit on 201952 by Arbitrageur because: clarification



posted on May, 2 2019 @ 03:32 PM
link   
a reply to: Waterglass


edit on 2-5-2019 by wmd_2008 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 3 2019 @ 05:35 AM
link   
a reply to: Arbitrageur


Excellent and Thanks




posted on May, 4 2019 @ 11:29 AM
link   
Well i think the triangles were definitely ours. Most likely got scrapped in favor of the new model. I would imagine the bovine genetic experiments have run their course. I mean how many cow rectums do you have to core to get what you're looking for? As a whole i think high strangeness still exists, it is just evolving like everything else.




top topics



 
28
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join