It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Why do Dems support concentration camps?

page: 1
15
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 19 2019 @ 11:40 AM
link   
While reading the typical flurry of Dems supporting their ill-famed FDR, I am always amused at those who intermix calls of "fascism" against the right while still supporting FDR

Apparently they forget that FDR was the architect of American concentration camps.

Under Executive Order 9066, FDR ordered the internment of tens of thousands of American citizens of Japanese heritage without due process.

These Japanese-Americans were American Citizens deprived of their basic civil liberties. The 5th & 14th amendment rights were trampled on by socialist scum bag FDR.

Funny how they ignore this along with their long history of racism/slavery in the democrat party.


Sorry if your history is inconvenient for you Dems. And you all wonder why we reject socialism & progressivism with a state of absolute moral clarity. Think long and hard when self-styled socialists like AOC support that vile cretin.
edit on 4/19/2019 by JBurns because: (no reason given)




posted on Apr, 19 2019 @ 11:45 AM
link   
a reply to: JBurns

dude what are you talking about

who is supporting concentration camps?

www.abovetopsecret.com...


I just hope they are made into exclusion zones like we did in WW2 to ensure they are forced to stay there. And the Japanese-Americans in WW2 were *actual* Americans/Citizens. Screw illegal trash


you said that

so it sounds like you support concentration camps as long as the proper people are in them



posted on Apr, 19 2019 @ 11:47 AM
link   
a reply to: JBurns

They were mad at Lincoln for abolishing slavery too. Thankfully more Americans are discovering the truth.



posted on Apr, 19 2019 @ 12:10 PM
link   
a reply to: TinySickTears

This is what REX-84 was established for, however

These would be temporary holding areas so we could address their asylum claims without violating any sort of due process. In the case of these Americans, they were Citizens being detained for their nationality not for breaking any sort of law

That is the distinction (without difference, perhaps)




posted on Apr, 19 2019 @ 12:10 PM
link   
a reply to: TinySickTears

Can't debate the facts, so attack the messenger. I guess you go around waiting for someone to say something out of anger and quote for your whataboutism. Keep it classy Tiny.



posted on Apr, 19 2019 @ 12:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: Middleoftheroad
a reply to: TinySickTears

Can't debate the facts, so attack the messenger. I guess you go around waiting for someone to say something out of anger and quote for your whataboutism. Keep it classy Tiny.


i dont know what you are talking about either

what facts?

did you not see where i asked who is supporting them?

and i posted what he said
that is a fact

he said it


so what are you talking about?


i am confused and the lack of any conversation does not help

i mean we are talking about FDR

we have a member is saying how the dems were also mad at lincoln for freeing the slaves.

i just dont get how supporting or nor supporting things that happened 70 years ago or or 150 years ago has any bearing on today.

i ask but i dont get answers

i get bull# like your post

clearly i dont know and i am confused

clearly i keep asking

so fill me in

thats what discussion/debate it
edit on 19-4-2019 by TinySickTears because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 19 2019 @ 12:30 PM
link   
a reply to: JBurns

Spot on



posted on Apr, 19 2019 @ 12:39 PM
link   
a reply to: JBurns

Didnt you just let it slip Japanese WW2 internment camps were concentration camps in this thread? Or did you just quickly edit your post?

www.abovetopsecret.com...

LOL



posted on Apr, 19 2019 @ 12:39 PM
link   
a reply to: TinySickTears


thats what discussion/debate it


But how can there even be a discussion or debate when the head line reads ''Why do'' and then the Op only rants about ''why did''? I only opened this threat to see just what current concentration camps OP would claim are supported now, and if you hadn't offered to make sense out of this thread I would be long gone. So join me and let this one slide off into the dust bin of incredulity like it deserves.



posted on Apr, 19 2019 @ 12:40 PM
link   
I support some of the policies FDR put into place, but I don't know anyone who is educated about the man who is a fan of him as a person. Especially those who know about the camps. This entire OP is a false opinion.



posted on Apr, 19 2019 @ 12:41 PM
link   
a reply to: TinySickTears

Thank you pointing that out. The intellectual dishonesty rides high

"But but I'm doing it for the greater good......"



posted on Apr, 19 2019 @ 12:45 PM
link   
a reply to: TheConstruKctionofLight

yeah camps are cool as long as it is for the right reasons and the right people are in them.

so bizarre

starts a thread asking why dems support camps 5 minutes after he makes a post about hoping people will be put in camps.

hahahahahaah



posted on Apr, 19 2019 @ 01:17 PM
link   
a reply to: JBurns





Why do Dems support concentration camps?





So you wouldn't put the leftys in camps if you could.? Or just shoot them? I think we know what your intentions would be from your previous posts and threads. Aren't you the guy calling for a revolution?




[
edit on 19-4-2019 by olaru12 because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 19 2019 @ 01:58 PM
link   
FDR was a sketchy MFr.



posted on Apr, 19 2019 @ 02:07 PM
link   
a reply to: JBurns


IIn 1980 [Carter Admin], Congress established the Commission on Wartime Relocation and Internment of Civilians (CWRIC) to study the matter. On February 24, 1983, the commission issued a report entitled Personal Justice Denied, condemning the internment as unjust and motivated by racism and xenophobic ideas rather than factual military necessity.[202] Internment camp survivors sued the federal government for $24 million in property loss, but lost the case. However, the Commission recommended that $20,000 in reparations be paid to those Japanese Americans who had suffered internment.[203]
The Civil Liberties Act of 1988 exemplified the Japanese American redress movement that impacted the large debate about the reparation bill. There was question over whether the bill would pass during the 1980s due to the poor state of the federal budget and the low support of Japanese Americans covering 1% of the United States. However, four powerful Japanese-American Democrats and Republicans who had war experience, with the support of Democratic congressmen Barney Frank, sponsored the bill and pushed for its passage as their top priority.
Internment_of_Japanese_Americans

The anti-Japanese racism was bi-partisan and so was the later apology and reparations.



posted on Apr, 19 2019 @ 02:33 PM
link   
I had to laugh because your ignorance is truly amusing..a reply to: JBurns




posted on Apr, 19 2019 @ 02:33 PM
link   
I had to laugh because your ignorance is truly amusing..a reply to: JBurns




posted on Apr, 19 2019 @ 02:33 PM
link   
I had to laugh because your ignorance is truly amusing..a reply to: JBurns




posted on Apr, 19 2019 @ 02:33 PM
link   
I had to laugh because your ignorance is truly amusing..a reply to: JBurns




posted on Apr, 19 2019 @ 02:33 PM
link   
I had to laugh because your ignorance is truly amusing..a reply to: JBurns





top topics



 
15
<<   2 >>

log in

join