It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
AND YOUR GOING TO BACK THIS UP HOW? ANY EXCUSE to slip into your usual anti-Bush baseless rhetoric eh Sofi? Ive already congratulated you for getting a WATS award for leading the blind masses with your opinionated, baseless, and always bashing accusations against the President. Sort of like the HYPE i just quoted you on again eh? Please bring up some non related support for your position that you'd like us to stretch into also suporting your allegations here.
The hype is mostly around keeping Americans whipped into a frenzy so Bush can justify Patriot Act II - and slide it in right under the radar.
I seem to remember another local area despot making similar threats....
untill we found him hidding in a hole in the ground....all his threats amounted to squat.
Iranian leaders can shoot off thier mouthes all they want...not doing so would be presenting a weak face to their population.
The proof will come IF and When trouble ensues.
AND YOUR GOING TO BACK THIS UP HOW? ANY EXCUSE to slip into your usual anti-Bush baseless rhetoric eh Sofi? Ive already congratulated you for getting a WATS award for leading the blind masses with your opinionated, baseless, and always bashing accusations against the President. Sort of like the HYPE i just quoted you on again eh? Please bring up some non related support for your position that you'd like us to stretch into also suporting your allegations here.
Lets see here, an Iranian general makes threats and that translates into Bush signing PatAct II how? Oh the huge leap of logic i see comming, and with again nothing to support it.
NOPE, i havnt forgotten the unanimous UN resolution right before the war statred that pretty much spelled out the WORLDS opinion of the believed state of WMD's in Iraq, NOR have i forgotten that many world intelligence agencies had provided what we NOW know to be incorrect information that the decision to war on was partially based.
I also seem to remember this rat in the hole not having a substantialy powerfull military force, or nuclear weapons, unlike his Iranian counterparts. People seem to forget this little fact, no?
While i agree that a person can make opinions based of of assumptive empirical facts, that doenst mean those empirical facts actually translate or equate to the opinion given.
Sofi is simply stating a general assumption based on empirical facts,
How is an Iranian general, under the Bush "payroll" to be use as a scapegoat for pushing in the patriot act?