It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: XAnarchistX
what the hell kind of lying title is that...
I love the pale faces who deny the Native genocide and say "we won the war" and that us Natives have to accept it and get over it, and yet are the first ones to whine and cry about "invaders"
get over it, you are probably going to lose
but a spokesperson said in an email that CBP “does not endorse private groups or organizations taking enforcement matters into their own hands”, adding, “Interference by civilians in law enforcement matters could have public safety and legal consequences for all parties involved.”
Rachel Lederman, a California civil rights lawyer not involved in the case, said it was illegal for a private citizen to “interfere with somebody’s freedom of movement”, and that in a situation like this, prosecutors could potentially allege “false imprisonment” and “kidnapping”.
The militia members could also potentially face consequences for acting as “unregistered and unlicensed people pretending to be security”, said Michael German, a former FBI agent.
originally posted by: djz3ro
a reply to: JBurns
Your title is disenguous, can you show me where the Guardian uses the word '"Patriots"?
From your link..
The American Civil Liberties Union is calling the actions a ‘kidnapping’ and a flagrant violation of the law
So these are common criminals you are hero worshipping. It doesn't surprise me you're celebrating these law breakers, your posts here all have a very unhealthy "Brown Devil" slant to them, it's a very iumhealthy attitude to have. Such negativity and paranoia eat away at a person, so erm, good luck with that...
originally posted by: superman2012
I'm curious as to why this is an issue.
Are they taking your jobs? Stealing your women? Committing more crime than is the norm for the area? Eating all the food? Taking over your houses?
They aren't able to vote so they can't affect any outcome. They can't take advantage of any government welfare programs (as far as I know).
Please let me know what the issue here is other than "they don't belong here". Thanks in advance!
originally posted by: superman2012
a reply to: MichiganSwampBuck
Well that's where you're completely wrong. I was just trying to understand the mindset of a country that has a giant statue that symbolizes ideals such as liberty, peace, human rights, abolition of slavery, democracy and opportunity. I am genuinely interested to understand why people are against it. *shrug*