It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by devilwasp
There are always a few bad apples but that doesnt mean that the british army does send men to torture people.
Yeah then you should know that the british army would not order its men and women to torture someone.
your going to complain to me about how precise you want me to be?
Ok, I'll rephrase what I said.
Your picking me up on how precise I am?
Originally posted by Tinkleflower
Sorry, I don't know that. Having read many of the "torture papers", it does appear that there are some commanding officers who have ordered heinous acts....naturally, these are never official, and they are never what the respective military branch would recommend or condone; but the fact remains.
Originally posted by Tinkleflower
Which, as I said, is a different matter.
Sorry, I don't know that. Having read many of the "torture papers", it does appear that there are some commanding officers who have ordered heinous acts....naturally, these are never official, and they are never what the respective military branch would recommend or condone; but the fact remains.
No...you said two entirely different things, that's all. First you said that you were sure that no British serviceman would ever do such a thing. Then, you said that you were sure that no British serviceman would ever order such a thing - the two statements are very different. That's all
Originally posted by rogue1
Hmm, ' the fact remains ' ? What ? that British soldiers torture people in Iraq ? So far all I've seen is waffling BS. You've read ' torture' papers, lol of course you have. Where are your links, you make some heavy allegations with no sources.
Originally posted by devilwasp
You do know that many poeple have been brought under "war crime" allegations and well its mostly a load of BS, hell one guy lost his command for it and it was a load of BS.
Originally posted by Tinkleflower
Yup, I'm aware of that
Did you investigate these cases mentioned though?
There are admissions of guilt.
Originally posted by mr conspiracy
Would you keep the present attitude if your son was treated the same way?
[edit on 10-9-2005 by mr conspiracy]
Originally posted by zer69
Originally posted by Leon Bokhove
Do you have any statements why I should reconsider joining our Special Forces?
I don't, that was just off topic response, it comes from my anti-military nature.
Originally posted by Leon Bokhove
He means: Would you torture the insurgent because he would do so when he caught you alive?
I think that's bull# and it's really against all I stand for, I can live with taking
somebody out but I can't live with the fact that I would have to torture people.
Originally posted by devilwasp
BTW this is all hypothetical since the britsh armed forces doesnt tolerate torture.
Originally posted by mr conspiracy
Would you keep the present attitude if your son was treated the same way?
[edit on 10-9-2005 by mr conspiracy]
Yes would you do it if he had just shot at your mates and probably killed you and quite a few civilains, along with his mates doing the same?
Originally posted by Leon Bokhove
Originally posted by zer69
I don't, that was just off topic response, it comes from my anti-military nature.
Too bad, because that would have been interresting. Perhaps you can tell me
why you have this anti-military background? Happenings in the past perhaps?
Originally posted by devilwasp
Originally posted by zer69
That sentence was bad written by me it should've been like: "I would like to point out that those soldiers which perhaps do that.."
Sorry for that.
With respect even hinting it implies you have proof...do you?