It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Prediction: Leftists won't accept the Mueller report and here's why

page: 3
37
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 17 2019 @ 11:55 AM
link   
a reply to: Waterglass

like how trump and republicans tried to spin that mueller was bad? lol

good lord.. ya, martial law will make things peachy, care to explain how that would work?




posted on Apr, 17 2019 @ 12:09 PM
link   
It's funny how the right wing lemmings here are already accusing the left of not accepting the Mueller report and calling them hypocritical while they, themselves, haven't read the report either.

Its like some kind of idiot singularity.



posted on Apr, 17 2019 @ 12:15 PM
link   



posted on Apr, 17 2019 @ 12:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: underwerks
It's funny how the right wing lemmings here are already accusing the left of not accepting the Mueller report


Because the left is already spreading their usual spin suggesting the report is getting redacted to hide ""something"".


What you won't see in the Mueller report



and calling them hypocritical while they, themselves, haven't read the report either.


Do you think the left MSM have?


Its like some kind of idiot singularity.


That's your first correct assumption in a very long time. Not in the way you think but still.
edit on 17/4/2019 by vinifalou because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 17 2019 @ 12:38 PM
link   
a reply to: vinifalou




Because the left is already spreading their usual spin suggesting the report is getting redacted to hide ""something"".


You must admit that Barr, trumps hand picked AG, doing the redacting, looks like a cover up. Especially with trumps WH playing fast and loose with the truth so often.

Anyway, the unredacted investigation has already been leaked. Rudy G. had a copy already.



posted on Apr, 17 2019 @ 12:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: olaru12
a reply to: vinifalou



Because the left is already spreading their usual spin suggesting the report is getting redacted to hide ""something"".


You must admit that Barr, trumps hand picked AG, doing the redacting, looks like a cover up.


As I mentioned in the OP, the Special Counsel (Mueller team) is helping in redacting the report. So, no, Barr isn't in a conspiracy cover-up to hide all of Trump's criminals activities.

But perhaps the left would be happier if an Obama-picked AG would help in redacting the report?

Pretty sure there'll be plenty of Obama and Hillary in the report as well.


Anyway, the unredacted investigation has already been leaked. Rudy G. had a copy already.


Do you mind sharing it with us?
edit on 17/4/2019 by vinifalou because: (no reason given)

edit on 17/4/2019 by vinifalou because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 17 2019 @ 12:50 PM
link   
a reply to: vinifalou

Rosenstein said yesterday that 70% of the Mueller report will be about the primary investigation, which is "Russia Interfering in the 2016 election". He said much of the report will be about cyber-related issues, and those Russians and Americans who were indicted.

Those hoping to find a 400 page dissertation on Donald Trump, will have a very depressing Easter weekend.



posted on Apr, 17 2019 @ 01:13 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

so, Russia did interfere?

all I want is for trump to acknowledge that on a world stage. do you think he'll do that?

i also want to know what he is doing to safe guard future elections and how he's beefing up our cybersecurity. both should have been a priority two years ago, but he believed putin.. sad.



posted on Apr, 17 2019 @ 01:25 PM
link   
a reply to: olaru12




You must admit that Barr, trumps hand picked AG, doing the redacting, looks like a cover up.

I am confused.
Which president hasn't picked their AG?
Is this something new for trump?
Was barr not confirmed by the senate, like all former ag's?



posted on Apr, 17 2019 @ 01:27 PM
link   
a reply to: knoxie




all I want is for trump to acknowledge that on a world stage. do you think he'll do that?

he has

www.latimes.com...



On Friday, President Trump appeared to to acknowledge that the country did, in fact, interfere.



posted on Apr, 17 2019 @ 01:29 PM
link   
Prediction the conservatives will not accept the Mueller report and
WE ALL know why.
This report in no way exonerates the president.



posted on Apr, 17 2019 @ 01:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme

This report in no way exonerates the president.


Oh so you read it already.

What charges is Trump facing?
edit on 17/4/2019 by vinifalou because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 17 2019 @ 01:32 PM
link   
Prediction:
some won't show up here tomorrow
similar to 9 nov 16



posted on Apr, 17 2019 @ 01:36 PM
link   
a reply to: vinifalou

morning joe summarized it for her
maddow with go in depth with her later



posted on Apr, 17 2019 @ 01:37 PM
link   
a reply to: vinifalou

Considering Barr did just that in 1989 I dont see how we can expect anything but dishonesty from him.


www.vanityfair.com...


A 1989 memo Barr wrote summarizing the “principal conclusions” of a D.O.J. ruling apparently left out several of those principal conclusions.




Later this week, Attorney General William Barr is expected to release a redacted version of Robert Mueller’s report on Russian interference in the 2016 election. In his 4-page summary of the 400-odd-page report, Barr noted that the special counsel “did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government,” but did not come to a conclusion about whether the president had obstructed justice. That Barr took it upon himself to clear Donald Trump of obstruction, even though Mueller had not, raised a number of questions about how closely the A.G. had hewed to the spirit of the report, and whether he’d put his own Trump-supporting spin on it—questions that increased after members of Mueller’s team reportedly expressed frustration that Barr had shortchanged their work. And according to new insight from law professor Ryan Goodman, it seems those questions are entirely reasonable!




Goodman, who is a former Defense Department special counsel, details a remarkably similar fight from 1989 in which Barr, then head of the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel, was involved. The O.L.C. had determined that the F.B.I. was allowed to take people into custody in foreign countries without the consent of those countries’ governments—a ruling that seemed to pave the way, Goodman notes, for the eventual arrest of former Panamanian leader Manuel Antonio Noriega. This was a contentious position to take, and Barr was asked to provide the memo offering the detailed legal rationale for allowing such detentions. He declined, instead offering a 13-page document that “summarizes the principal conclusions.” When Congress, and then The Washington Post, obtained the full opinion in 1991, it was quickly noted that several conclusions from the full document hadn’t been included in Barr’s summary. Foremost among them was that the opinion authorized the president of the United States to ignore the United Nations Charter.


This tells us all we need to know about how fair and impartial this POS is.



posted on Apr, 17 2019 @ 01:38 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

lol


This tells us all we need to know about how fair and impartial this POS is.

maybe she has seen the report
lol



posted on Apr, 17 2019 @ 01:40 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

Did you know the Special Counsel, AKA Mueller team, is also helping Barr redacting the report?

Is Mueller dirty too? Rosenstein?


edit on 17/4/2019 by vinifalou because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 17 2019 @ 01:41 PM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

Yea it's unbelievable. There she goes with her fake account starring her own posts again and blabbing nonsense as if it were the undeniable truth.

It's an amazing human experiment to watch and absorb.



posted on Apr, 17 2019 @ 01:42 PM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

lolololol

appears to acknowledge - you're kidding, right?

no, he'll definitely have to address the American people and acknowledge the interference and what he is doing to safeguard us.

don't you think so? if not, why?

personally I think that terrifies him, but we'll see..



posted on Apr, 17 2019 @ 01:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Sillyolme

lol


This tells us all we need to know about how fair and impartial this POS is.

maybe she has seen the report
lol



Since Barr/Trump are in total control, the detractors words mean nada. Safe to ignore them.





top topics



 
37
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join