Social agendas that are forced on a population all at once can result in rebellion or even revolution. However, social agendas that are spoon-fed
(incrementally) to a population over an extended period of time results in acclimatization and acceptance of those ideas, without a realization of
what the ultimate goal is. As long as this is done under the guise of being something good or beneficial for the people, then there is usually little
resistance to it from the bulk of the population.
Adolf Hitler was once quoted as saying "He alone, who owns the youth, gains the future".
This why children are the most targeted with regards to psychological manipulation, trends, technology, social movements, celebrity influences,
Before I go any further, let me first say that I have no problem with the way that people choose to express themselves, through art, or otherwise.
This is an essential part of freedom. The only caveat that I would add to that, is to express ourselves in a way that promotes no harm to others.
How do you get people to warm up to the idea of implanting technology into their bodies (that will be used in the future to control us in ways that
will be beyond scary)? Do it incrementally.
In this video (linked below), Regina Dugan (managing director of DARPA at the time), talks about how cool it is to apply technology onto and into our
I thought this presentation was really creepy, not just because it's coming from DARPA and Google, but because it is being targeted specifically at
In the video, Regina Dugan, makes the following points regarding wearable and implantable technology:
* It's cool and trendy "everybody is interested in wearables"
* It's a way to get "superpowers"
* It's a way to be rebellious and piss off your parents
* You can conveniently ingest your "authentication" (control) technology. It's so easy (clapping from the audience)
At the end of the clip Regina says, just take the pill.
Here is the incremental road to total control, total loss of freedom, total loss of self and collectivism:
1) Get a tattoo, it's cool and trendy. All of the celebrities have one
2) Get a "wearable" (fitbit, apple watch, etc). You can "track" everything that you do, all day, every day
3) Get an electronic tattoo (get rid of that big bulky watch). Now you can wear tech directly on your skin all of the time
4) Take an electronic pill. What could be more convenient than that?
5) Get a brain chip. Now you can be connected all of the time without having to carry around a phone (and we can be connected to you all of the
6) And so on
Do a search on Amazon for "tattoos for children". You will get pages and pages of such products aimed at young children. Why did this trend suddenly
explode about eight years ago? Perhaps this is one way to get children ready to accept the idea of putting something foreign on (or in) their body.
Just trust them.
* Trust us, it's just "temporary" (remember incrementalism)
* We would never use this technology to try and manipulate your brains or psychology (please see the post on 4/10/19)
* We would never use it to "stream" anything directly into your brain or body that is harmful (what do they stream at us today?)
* It will be totally secure. No need to worry about any security vulnerabilities, "update" glitches, or software/hardware backdoors like there is
with present technology
* Regina Dugan has worked for DARPA, Google, and Facebook. These companies are of course completely transparent, value our privacy, and have never
demonstrated a desire to do anything unethical. Google's "code of conduct" used to include the phrase "don't be evil" (from around 2000 to
2018). However, in 2018, they removed it from their code of ethics. Why was that?
Why will most people probably eventually adopt this technology, despite the drawbacks?
* It will be trendy. All of the celebrities will have it, and all of their friends will have it
* It will be so convenient and efficient (and probably less dangerous than looking down at your phone all day)
* Now that everyone is fully hooked into social media, once it transitions into a brain/machine interface, people will need to make the switch or lose
their connections with "friends", their perceived self-worth and social status, and the addictive dopamine high that they are accustomed to
* Forget about old school controllers and bulky head gear, now you can play video games and control virtual reality right in your head. How cool is
* It will be needed to stay competitive in the workplace with others that have been chipped
* It will be needed to stay competitive in school with other children that have been chipped
* It will be needed to keep pace with the intelligence of the coming AI. But of course that AI will be benevolent, well programmed and will only
"interface" with us in the most positive and beneficial ways. It will never see us as a threat, even if we come to see it as a threat
Regina Dugan and Implantable Technology - www.youtube.com...
DARPA – Information Awareness Office. Check out their creepy logo and stated objectives. Also check out DARPA in general and some of their other
Stargate "Revisions". This episode illustrates quite well some of the potential pitfalls of "brain tech".
Mark Zuckerberg sells nearly 30 million shares of facebook (about 5 billion dollars based on today's stock price) to create CZI, an "initiative"
that will study and develop brain/machine interfaces. Of course it will be for the benefit of the people (remember how incrementalism is sold to us).
Elon Musk launches Neuralink, a venture to merge the human brain with AI -
The Road to Dystopia - pbase.com...
Strange Things - pbase.com...
The Bus Trip - pbase.com...