It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

A Blockbuster Trump Report will Be Released With the Mueller Report.

page: 3
56
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 14 2019 @ 09:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Lumenari

Nixon and his appointees said he was inncoent too. Still, the Supreme Court ruled that Nixon, nor any president, could use executive priviledge to cover up any wrongdoing. Mueller did not exhonerate Trump or his campaign of wrongdoing.



Yes Mueller did in fact exonerate Trump and his campaign of wrongdoing. 😎


Nope


"While this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him."




posted on Apr, 14 2019 @ 09:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Sookiechacha

I thought Nixon said that ? 😮

Or was it Carter? 😯


Snookie or whoever doesn't understand Civics.



But it was reported on and talked about last week on the news... I got a Business Insider report on it in an email. since the Mueller report found no wrong-doing, Trump was well within his legal rights to redact whatever he wanted to.

He declined. Now I find out that nobody knows about it?

I guess CNN didn't cover it?




posted on Apr, 14 2019 @ 09:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Lumenari

Nixon and his appointees said he was inncoent too. Still, the Supreme Court ruled that Nixon, nor any president, could use executive priviledge to cover up any wrongdoing. Mueller did not exhonerate Trump or his campaign of wrongdoing.



Yes Mueller did in fact exonerate Trump and his campaign of wrongdoing. 😎


Nope


"While this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him."




Link please to the no exoneration part?

Are you quoting the Attorney General, or Donn Lemon?

Vox, perhaps?

CNN?


edit on 14-4-2019 by Lumenari because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 14 2019 @ 09:46 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

What is a "blockbuster" anyways



Blockbuster LLC, formerly Blockbuster Entertainment, Inc., and also known as Blockbuster Video or simply Blockbuster, is an American-based provider of home movie and video game rental services through a video rental shop, DVD-by-mail, streaming, video on demand, and cinema theater. Wikipedia




A blockbuster is a Hollywood movie that's made with a large budget and big stars. A true blockbuster is extremely popular and brings in a lot of money. Typically, a blockbuster is a fabulous summer movie that audiences line up to see the first weekend it's released.




block·bust·er
/ˈbläkˌbəstər/
nounINFORMAL
a thing of great power or size, in particular a movie, book, or other product that is a great commercial success.


Behold a thing of great power or size! It busts blocks. Therefore, a blockbuster is basically a hammer or large metal bludgeoning tool or weapon, like a banhammer.

All I know is, I've got the Orville Redenbocker $6 gourmet pack but I'm saving it for something else because this sounds like more of the same political soap opera drama. The Empire Strikes Back and the evil rat libs run in terror from the awe of the Trump thing of great power or size.

Shed a tear at the end and get in your feelings of persecution and vindication. "That really hit them where it hurts. Heads have got to roll now" Spoiler Alert: They rarely ever do. Remember, Jesus said if you have the faith of a mustard seed, you can tell a mountain to move and it will out of your sheer faith and righteousness.



posted on Apr, 14 2019 @ 09:47 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

The report cannot exonerate him being there was no crime committed thus no charges filed. The report concludes no accusation to exonerate him from. It was information gathering to exam whether or not to accuse, unless of course the information was simply gathered for the court of public opinion?
edit on 4/14/2019 by TheLead because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 14 2019 @ 09:52 PM
link   
a reply to: Vector99




Pretty sure your TDS just caused you to make that up.



No, no, it totally makes sense that the report generated by the executive branch for the executive branch would be reviewed by a completely separate branch before the executive branch sees it. Policy, law, something, something...




posted on Apr, 14 2019 @ 09:54 PM
link   
a reply to: TheLead

Barr isn't handing the report over to Congress as a favor. He's doing it because he must. Congress is an equal branch of government, not the court of public opinion.


+3 more 
posted on Apr, 14 2019 @ 10:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: TheLead

Barr isn't handing the report over to Congress as a favor. He's doing it because he must. Congress is an equal branch of government, not the court of public opinion.



Also, not true. The statute requires him to notify Congress of the conclusions reached. He does not need to show them a single word of the report itself.

You should take a civics class instead of making things up because they sound true to you.



posted on Apr, 14 2019 @ 10:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: RadioRobert

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: TheLead

Barr isn't handing the report over to Congress as a favor. He's doing it because he must. Congress is an equal branch of government, not the court of public opinion.



Also, not true. The statute requires him to notify Congress of the conclusions reached. He does not need to show them a single word of the report itself.

You should take a civics class instead of making things up because they sound true to you.


Now, I said that but was accused of attacking the poster because they were ignorant.

Glad you said it instead.




posted on Apr, 14 2019 @ 10:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: underwerks
Why would someone need a counter report for something that totally exonerates them?

Hmmm...


Most likely to emphasize the real collusion and illegal spying that took place which fueled the whole sham? Trump always does these rebuttals and has never been wrong.

That much should be obvious to you by now. When will people learn that their lies and their bearing of false witness against Trump can never win anything for them? Obviously never since they keep grasping at invisible straws. How many times do the lies of the left bearing absolutely NO FRUIT does it take for the left to even have a clue?



posted on Apr, 14 2019 @ 10:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: TheLead

Barr isn't handing the report over to Congress as a favor. He's doing it because he must. Congress is an equal branch of government, not the court of public opinion.



Could be perjurkery involved 😶



posted on Apr, 14 2019 @ 10:23 PM
link   
a reply to: Lumenari

The statute is available to be read. It calls the report "confidential", which is actually a brand of classification. It also says the AG must furnish his own report about the conclusions to ensure transparency. This has been done. The statute provides that the AG may determine that public interest merits the release of information in the report, or the report itself, consistent with other DOJ guidelines and regulations. The AG has stated he has made such a determination.

People are welcome to read the statute instead of inventing things. It covers these exact circumstances, as a well-thought out law should. They are typically drafted by lawyers, afterall...



posted on Apr, 14 2019 @ 10:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: carewemust

I suppose those "counter arguments" will dovetail nicely with the redactions.

Also, pretty sure showing the report to White House before Congress gets a redacted version violates a law or policy somewhere. I'm sure we'll being hearing about it from the talking heads.


"pretty sure"
"a law or policy somewhere"

Source,or its just your oral flatulence.
I'm "pretty sure".



posted on Apr, 14 2019 @ 10:48 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechachaand




Imagine the outrage had Bill Clinton reviewed and had input into the redactions of the Starr report before Congress got to see the evidence? Or, if Nixon was allowed to censor certain parts of the Watergate investigation, keeping evidence of his crimes from Congress. 




Just catching up on the thread, but this is funny, too.

The law governing Special Counsils was different then. It was actually changed to prevent another repeat of the voluminous Starr Report which smeared the Clinton's with a bazillion pages of inconvenient and incriminating facts uncovered during the investigation(s) about issues the DOJ had nevertheless determined not to prosecute. This very scenario we are facing. Only the shoe is on the other political foot this time.



posted on Apr, 14 2019 @ 10:58 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

The Mueller report and the Trump response.

One side will make wee in their pants and the other side will rejoice.



Nothing will get resolved from this Kangaroo Court Witch Hunt.

The haters will still hate and support a coup against a sitting president and his administration. They will abuse the rule of law, subvert the US Constitution just to get their anti-American Marxist bullsh#t program started.



posted on Apr, 14 2019 @ 11:15 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

Congress has no right to see the report unless action is recommended for them to take

Read the Special Counsel regulations. Mueller worked for and reports to the DOJ and therefore the President. Congress has no intrinsic right to see the report, nor - as a co-equal branch of government - can they twist their arm and force the matter.

If any report at all is released rest assured it reflects very well on Trump. Otherwise there are a dozen perfectly legal/valid justifications for withholding it - least of which being no action required from congress and the conclusion of "no crimes" already issued.

That said, I hope it is released in full. Will drive our point of no conspiracy/no 'collusion'/witch-hunt home

edit on 4/14/2019 by JBurns because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 14 2019 @ 11:19 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

What a waste of time and money.

BLOCKBUSTER went out of business years ago when people stopped renting movies.




posted on Apr, 15 2019 @ 03:19 AM
link   

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: underwerks
Why would someone need a counter report for something that totally exonerates them?

Hmmm...


So I guess you don't watch the news and what they do with any information relating to Trump.

HHmmm...


If the Mueller report totally exonerates him, what's up for interpretation?

Unless it doesn't really exonerate him..


Fella - you may not realise it yet, but your leftists tactics don't work at all anymore. The entire world is now fully aware that the liberal media and Democrats will take legal acts and politics and skew them into the greatest crime of the century. It's really more of a reflection on your own stupidity if you think that normal people are not going to be prepared for leftist bullsh*t.




posted on Apr, 15 2019 @ 04:33 AM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: underwerks
Why would someone need a counter report for something that totally exonerates them?

Hmmm...


So I guess you don't watch the news and what they do with any information relating to Trump.

HHmmm...


If the Mueller report totally exonerates him, what's up for interpretation?

Unless it doesn't really exonerate him..


Fella - you may not realise it yet, but your leftists tactics don't work at all anymore. The entire world is now fully aware that the liberal media and Democrats will take legal acts and politics and skew them into the greatest crime of the century. It's really more of a reflection on your own stupidity if you think that normal people are not going to be prepared for leftist bullsh*t.



So why do they need a counter report for something that completely clears and exonerates Trump?

Maybe you should address the argument and not throw your perceived biases at people.



posted on Apr, 15 2019 @ 04:42 AM
link   
The counter report might address the origins of the collusion claim, the FBI shenanigans, or the medias bias against Trump.

Wouldn't YOU as an individual publicly refute false allegations with facts?



So why do they need a counter report for something that completely clears and exonerates Trump?

Maybe you should address the argument and not throw your perceived biases at people.







 
56
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join