It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
More at: www.washingtonexaminer.com...
As Washington eagerly awaits the release of special counsel Robert Mueller’s report, President Trump’s team of lawyers is working feverishly to complete a counter-report to what Mueller’s redacted report might contain.
Trump’s team has been working on the counter-report for months, with news coming out last August that it would focus on whether the initiation of Mueller’s 22-month investigation was legitimate.
The counter report is now reportedly 140 pages long, but Trump’s lawyer Rudy Giuliani said he hopes to shave it down to 50 pages by the time the Mueller report is released, according to the Wall Street Journal.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: carewemust
Also, pretty sure showing the report to White House before Congress gets a redacted version violates a law or policy somewhere. I'm sure we'll being hearing about it from the talking heads.
originally posted by: odzeandennz
a reply to: carewemust
Surprise... counter tactics. !
Sprinkle some Obama bombshell for good measure.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: carewemust
I suppose those "counter arguments" will dovetail nicely with the redactions.
Also, pretty sure showing the report to White House before Congress gets a redacted version violates a law or policy somewhere. I'm sure we'll being hearing about it from the talking heads.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: carewemust
I suppose those "counter arguments" will dovetail nicely with the redactions.
Also, pretty sure showing the report to White House before Congress gets a redacted version violates a law or policy somewhere. I'm sure we'll being hearing about it from the talking heads.
originally posted by: underwerks
Why would someone need a counter report for something that totally exonerates them?
Hmmm...
Because he was exonerated on the Russian Collusions hoax, rightfully so.
originally posted by: underwerks
Why would someone need a counter report for something that totally exonerates them?
Hmmm...
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: carewemust
I suppose those "counter arguments" will dovetail nicely with the redactions.
Also, pretty sure showing the report to White House before Congress gets a redacted version violates a law or policy somewhere. I'm sure we'll being hearing about it from the talking heads.
originally posted by: Lumenari
originally posted by: underwerks
Why would someone need a counter report for something that totally exonerates them?
Hmmm...
So I guess you don't watch the news and what they do with any information relating to Trump.
HHmmm...
originally posted by: odzeandennz
a reply to: carewemust
Sprinkle some Obama bombshell for good measure.
originally posted by: underwerks
Why would someone need a counter report for something that totally exonerates them?
Hmmm...