It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Illegal Immigrants may be released in ONLY sanctuary cities

page: 2
39
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:
+4 more 
posted on Apr, 12 2019 @ 03:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: XAnarchistX
First Democrats are not for Open Borders, Democratic-socialists are not for open borders, hell even Socialists are not for open borders,

second, at what logical plan can you conceive that at first, you say "we are too full" into, we will just dump them in the States that I don't like and upsets me

this is intelligence?


Are you so afflicted by TDS, that you can not see the hypocrisy of the dims?

They refuse to admit there is a problem, let alone, actually addressing the problem, yet they don't want the illegals in thier neighborhood.

If they really had an honest conviction ont the subject, wouldn't they accept these ppl with open arms?

They hate Trump, more than they love America, and this is just Trump's way of calling them on thier BS.

Brilliant political move, actually.




posted on Apr, 12 2019 @ 03:22 PM
link   
Yep, we better get going on replacing the population with high birthrate subserviant tax payers.





posted on Apr, 12 2019 @ 03:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: okrian
a reply to: projectvxn

...
This is a question of Trump's spiteful and illegal knee-jerk babble. It would be like a Dem pres candidate saying "The Republicans want everyone to have guns, so let's hand them to babies as they exit the womb, safety off of course".


That's just stupid!

No Republican ever asked to give a gun to a baby. No Republican anywhere ever advocated anything like that.

On the other hand the self-proclaimed "sanctuary cities" have repeatedly and publicly invited illegal aliens into their boundaries and refused to assist federal authorities in apprehending them, even if they were criminals.

This is what they said they wanted. Why is it suddenly a problem to give them what they gave asked for?

Please don't ignore me question. Please answer me thoughtfully and logically, if you can. Explain why it's wrong to give people exactly what they asked for.
:
edit on 2019 4 12 by incoserv because: typos typos.



posted on Apr, 12 2019 @ 03:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: Mach2

originally posted by: XAnarchistX
First Democrats are not for Open Borders, Democratic-socialists are not for open borders, hell even Socialists are not for open borders,

second, at what logical plan can you conceive that at first, you say "we are too full" into, we will just dump them in the States that I don't like and upsets me

this is intelligence?


Are you so afflicted by TDS, that you can not see the hypocrisy of the dims?


I'd say the answer is a resounding YES!



posted on Apr, 12 2019 @ 03:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: incoserv

originally posted by: okrian
a reply to: projectvxn

...
This is a question of Trump's spiteful and illegal knee-jerk babble. It would be like a Dem pres candidate saying "The Republicans want everyone to have guns, so let's hand them to babies as they exit the womb, safety off of course".


That's just stupid!

No Republican ever asked to give a gun to a baby. No Republican anywhere ever advocated anything like that.


:


Not true...this dude that starts at 3:00 does:



Just sayin'



posted on Apr, 12 2019 @ 04:04 PM
link   
It’s pretty obvious today ( even to liberals ) that Nancy doesn’t believe what she says.

The problem for the Democratic Party is that this was one of their main positions. They’ve convinced their people sacrifices need to be made to help protect illegal immigrants fleeing oppression .

Nancy was looked to by many liberals as their moral leader ship. A woman whose heart was in the right place and that gave their aching hearts a warm fuzzy feeling .

Now they see her for what she is.

Some Liberals will turn away from her and turn to the radical left. Which will further widen the split in the party.

Thanks for being Nancy , Nancy and showing your true colors .

The 2020 democratic national convention is going to look like the one in 1968 .
edit on 12-4-2019 by Fallingdown because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 12 2019 @ 04:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: Fallingdown
It’s pretty obvious today ( even to liberals ) that Nancy doesn’t believe what she says.

The problem for the Democratic Party is that this was one of their main positions. They’ve convinced their people sacrifices need to be made to help protect illegal immigrants fleeing oppression .

Nancy was looked to by many liberals as their moral leader ship. A woman whose heart was in the right place and that gave their aching hearts a warm fuzzy feeling .

Now they see her for what she is.

Some Liberals will turn away from her and turn to the radical left. Which will further widen the split in the party.

Thanks for being Nancy , Nancy and showing your true colors .

The 2020 democratic national convention is going to look like the one in 1968 .


Laura Loomer setting up camp at Nancy Peolosi's mansion, lol
www.youtube.com...



posted on Apr, 12 2019 @ 04:20 PM
link   

Illegal Immigrants may be released in ONLY sanctuary cities


I'm in stitches over this. I hope Trump does it.

I can't think of a better way to bring home the problem to the left than to expect them to support the illegal aliens they claim to love.



posted on Apr, 12 2019 @ 04:23 PM
link   
a reply to: dug88

A Sacha Baron Cohen video to support your argument?

You're cute ...
:
edit on 2019 4 12 by incoserv because: dug88 was cute.



posted on Apr, 12 2019 @ 04:24 PM
link   
Sounds good to me as ... higher immigrant populations lead to lower crime.

www.themarshallproject.org...


According to data from the study, a large majority of the areas have many more immigrants today than they did in 1980 and fewer violent crimes.

The Marshall Project extended the study’s data up to 2016, showing that crime fell more often than it rose even as immigrant populations grew almost across the board.



In general, the study’s data suggests either that immigration has the effect of reducing average crime, or that there is simply no relationship between the two,

and that the 54 areas in the study where both grew were instances of coincidence, not cause and effect. T

his was a consistent pattern in each decade from 1980 to 2016, with immigrant populations and crime failing to grow together.


So with either conclusion - more immigrants - less crime.



posted on Apr, 12 2019 @ 04:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: XAnarchistX
First Democrats are not for Open Borders, Democratic-socialists are not for open borders, hell even Socialists are not for open borders,

second, at what logical plan can you conceive that at first, you say "we are too full" into, we will just dump them in the States that I don't like and upsets me

this is intelligence?


You're getting exactly what you wanted and was pushed for by the Democrats. You get to help poor economic migrants and avoid federal laws. I don't see why you aren't celebrating this idea

Just raise taxes again to help pay for the new arrivals and you should probably learn Spanish



posted on Apr, 12 2019 @ 05:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: FyreByrd
Sounds good to me as ... higher immigrant populations lead to lower crime.

www.themarshallproject.org...


According to data from the study, a large majority of the areas have many more immigrants today than they did in 1980 and fewer violent crimes.

The Marshall Project extended the study’s data up to 2016, showing that crime fell more often than it rose even as immigrant populations grew almost across the board.



In general, the study’s data suggests either that immigration has the effect of reducing average crime, or that there is simply no relationship between the two,

and that the 54 areas in the study where both grew were instances of coincidence, not cause and effect. T

his was a consistent pattern in each decade from 1980 to 2016, with immigrant populations and crime failing to grow together.


So with either conclusion - more immigrants - less crime.


First, the text of the study itself says it is inconclusive. Could be correlation without causation.

Second, you're likely dealing with a different set of immigrants here than those who influenced those studies - if, indeed, they did influence those studies. What a great opportunity to test the hypothesis and dump a few thousand of them into a nice sanctuary city and let them figure out how it works?
:
edit on 2019 4 12 by incoserv because: I could.



posted on Apr, 12 2019 @ 05:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: loam
a reply to: HonorablyTainted

Nancy Pelosi responded with outrage and called it cruel...

I guess it's only ok when you ship them to Nebraska.




I thought Pelosi called them "Gifts Of Love".

Trump should send all these "Gifts Of Love" to Pelosi's district.



posted on Apr, 12 2019 @ 05:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: FyreByrd
Sounds good to me as ... higher immigrant populations lead to lower crime.

www.themarshallproject.org...


According to data from the study, a large majority of the areas have many more immigrants today than they did in 1980 and fewer violent crimes.

The Marshall Project extended the study’s data up to 2016, showing that crime fell more often than it rose even as immigrant populations grew almost across the board.



In general, the study’s data suggests either that immigration has the effect of reducing average crime, or that there is simply no relationship between the two,

and that the 54 areas in the study where both grew were instances of coincidence, not cause and effect. T

his was a consistent pattern in each decade from 1980 to 2016, with immigrant populations and crime failing to grow together.


So with either conclusion - more immigrants - less crime.


You do understand the difference between illegal and legal immigration, right? Stop trying to conflate the two...



posted on Apr, 12 2019 @ 05:08 PM
link   
It seems like a no brainer , if you are a sanctuary city ,you should welcome all of these illegal immigrants and be happy to have them. If not then STFU



posted on Apr, 12 2019 @ 05:17 PM
link   
So y'alls stance goes from, don't let them in, to let them in but only in liberal cities? Which is it?

wHaT AbOuT tHe DrUgS rApE aNd DiSeAsE???!!?!

Besides, they're more beneficial in farming areas than in cities.



posted on Apr, 12 2019 @ 05:33 PM
link   
And I stated that either conclusion you draw from the study REFUTES the truth of this administration's immigrant delusions that increased immigration increases crime.

The referenced study clearly states ...

Most likely - it has no direct causal effect on crime rates.

or

It correlates to decreased levels of crime in cities with rising levels of immigrant populations.

... please take the time to read the material before you response with your opinion. An uninformed opinion is not a valid argument.



posted on Apr, 12 2019 @ 05:33 PM
link   
And I stated that either conclusion you draw from the study REFUTES the truth of this administration's immigrant delusions that increased immigration increases crime.

The referenced study clearly states ...

Most likely - it has no direct causal effect on crime rates.

or

It correlates to decreased levels of crime in cities with rising levels of immigrant populations.

... please take the time to read the material before you response with your opinion. An uninformed opinion is not a valid argument.



posted on Apr, 12 2019 @ 05:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: LordAhriman
So y'alls stance goes from, don't let them in, to let them in but only in liberal cities? Which is it?

wHaT AbOuT tHe DrUgS rApE aNd DiSeAsE???!!?!



First, nobody here is actually in favor of putting then anywhere inside US borders. If you ask those of us who are liking this proposal, you'd find that we're pretty much in favor of either allowing them to go through the legal immigration process (which they should have done, anyway), or just sending them back to where they came from. It's those "liberal cities" that are wanting them to stay, dude.

Which is exactly the point. Thank you for underscoring it so well for us. If the liberal "sanctuary cities want them to stay, why shouldn't they stay exactly there.

As to the drugs, rape and disease: another EXCELLENT POINT! If they are all a bunch of sweet, wonderful hardworking people like the liberals claim, why wouldn't they want them? Why wouldn't Nancy Pelosi say, "Bring them on! They'll make good denizens of our metropolitan areas!" They get to tell the right, WE TOLD YOU SO!

If they bring drugs, rape and disease, it's no less than they deserve.
:
edit on 2019 4 12 by incoserv because: I could.

edit on 2019 4 12 by incoserv because: I could.



posted on Apr, 12 2019 @ 05:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: loam
a reply to: HonorablyTainted

Nancy Pelosi responded with outrage and called it cruel...

I guess it's only ok when you ship them to Nebraska.



It's not good if they go to sanctuary cities - Democrats already have enough illegal votes in those places.
They need to be placed in purple states.
Trump is messing with their plans.



new topics

top topics



 
39
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join