Democrats want immigrants, but not in their cities

www.mercurynews.com...

White House proposed releasing immigrant detainees in sanctuary cities

Anyone watch the news this morning? You can't make this stuff up. Democrats are livid. Why? Because the White House wants to
give them exactly what they are asking for, immigrants. I guess they want them, but just not in their fancy neighborhoods.

Looks like these people don't practice what they preach. Nancy isn't too keen on having immigrants in her city.
She actually called it CRUEL.. yes, her exact words, CRUEL. the hypocrisy is astonishing.

I guess it is ok for normal Joe Schmoe American to have to deal with the crime and everything, and that isn't cruel, but it is cruel to her if they
are in her neighborhood. Wh--a--t--e---v--e---r

Good, give them tent and food stamps and porta toilets .

a reply to: JAGStorm

Well duh, the whole point is to use illegals to vote in elections they shouldn't and flip red states. They can't do that if they're in states already voting blue.

a reply to: JAGStorm


I couldn’t believe it at first! Well played President Trump for forcing them to show their true intentions 🇺🇸

a reply to: JAGStorm

From your source:

The White House told U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement that the plan was intended to alleviate a shortage of jail space but also served to send a message to Democrats. The attempt at political retribution raised alarm within ICE, with a top official responding that it was rife with budgetary and liability concerns, and noting that “there are PR risks as well.”

After the White House pressed again in February, ICE’s legal department rejected the idea as inappropriate and rebuffed the administration.

A White House official and a spokesman for the DHS sent nearly identical statements to The Post on Thursday, indicating that the proposal is no longer under consideration.

What people need to understand about "Sanctuary Cities" is that the Federal government has every right to operate in them. What they don't have the right to do, and this has been held up in courts, is conscribe local facilities, resources and employees to do the Federal government's job for them. It's a matter of jurisdiction, and of course money. The Federal government can't steal funds from cities that are not allocated or reimbursed.

And, this whole idea of conscribing local facilities, resources and employees came from the Obama Administration and was shot down in the courts. The Trump Administration knows this and Trump is just throwing tantrums and trying enact vengeance on these cities and their populations.

a reply to: JAGStorm

What a great way to alleviate our shelters on the border and give the democrats what they said they wanted! Get the buses load and begin the caravans to their sanctuary cities. Sure it may be overwhelming, but they have been shouting about how Trump admin has been so inhumane...I am positive they can humanely handle this soooo much better. Go Dems!





Edit add: oh damn! Just read the post update above. It would have been sweet revenge for the Dems duplicity.

The beautiful part is that Trump didn't even do it.
He just put the story out that he thought about doing it.

And the Dems go bonkers!

He is a master troll.

a reply to: butcherguy

Apparently it made his own Homeland Security officials go bonkers too. I guess this is one of the reason for the latest purge.

I also heard and read this story this morning, and just LOL'd

What beautiful irony.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: butcherguy

Apparently it made his own Homeland Security officials go bonkers too. I guess this is one of the reason for the latest purge.

Yes, and he colluded with the Russians.
And he's a racist that had a black girlfriend.
Oh yeah, don't forget he is a Nazi that has a Jewish daughter, son-in-law and grandchildren.

a reply to: Sookiechacha

What people need to understand about "Sanctuary Cities" is that the Federal government has every right to operate in them. What they don't have the right to do, and this has been held up in courts, is conscribe local facilities, resources and employees to do the Federal government's job for them.

That is not the issue
The issue is , if the local or state police arrest an illegal , they are bound to notify ICE .
They are NOT doing their job , much less the Federal government's
You knew that of course
Just say yes.

They want votes in non-Democrat voting pockets 😎

They want a Cloward-Piven overload distributed equally 😎

..............

.................

a reply to: JAGStorm

Reminds me of this we all know leftists are full of crap though.

a reply to: Gothmog

You're misinformed. Here's a snipped/clipped except from a very detailed flow chart, found here: www.washingtonpost.com...

Here’s how the deportations process usually works....

A city police officer pulls someone over and arrests him or her for something unrelated to citizenship (such as drunken driving or disorderly conduct). Whether or not the city has a sanctuary policy …
... he or she is booked into the local county jail, which is usually run by the county sheriff’s department.

At the jail, his or her fingerprints are taken and sent to the FBI, which sends the inmates’ information to Immigration and Customs Enforcement. U.S. law requires this information sharing between local and federal law enforcement agencies.

If ICE finds that the inmate is undocumented, it submits a detainer request to the county jail. ICE typically asks jails to hold inmates an extra 48 hours after they would otherwise be released so they can get a warrant to begin deportation proceedings.

Under Trump’s new policy, ICE could begin deportation earlier in the process, before criminal proceedings are complete.
The Department of Homeland Security has said that complying with these requests is voluntary because keeping someone in jail without a warrant violates the 4th Amendment. So, what happens next depends on county policy.

If the county typically complies with ICE requests, the inmate would stay in jail while ICE works to obtain an administrative deportation warrant.
If the jail is in a county with a policy of frequently declining these requests, the inmate is released once the criminal case is complete — if the he or she is convicted but doesn’t face additional jail time, if charges are dropped or if bail is met.

A Department of Justice inspector general report found that some jails will only comply with a detainer request when the inmate has prior felony convictions, gang membership or is on a terrorist watch list. Others reject every detainer request.

If ICE obtains the warrant, they could pick up the inmate and transfer him to a federal prison. Or, the inmate could stay in county jail while he or she undergoes deportation proceedings. If so, the jail can request money from the Department of Justice to recoup part of the cost of detainment.

Eventually, the inmate could be deported.

Miami-Dade Blew $12.5 Million Holding ICE Detainees in 2017, Rights Groups Say www.miaminewtimes.com...

a reply to: JAGStorm

It's because democrats have become domestic terrorists and want to destroy the very fabric of our country through "fundamental transformation".

You think sanctuary cities would be lining up to accept illegals. Why aren’t they?

a reply to: JAGStorm

Democrats already own those states. No point in adding more voters there, they need to send them to Red states to control those voting centers too. Just like black people used to be useful tools for Democrats, Immigrants are the new slaves/tools.

a reply to: JAGStorm

I actually find this hilarious and fully endorse this move by trump. Take all the immigrants get a bus and drop them off at every sanctuary city in the USA.

I don't get why they're so angry? Isn't this what they wanted?