It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -Q-

page: 82
142
<< 79  80  81    83  84  85 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 18 2019 @ 12:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: tiredoflooking
a reply to: EchoesInTime

My question to Trey here would be why does he assume what's in that most top secret info implicates Russia?

Doesn't it make more sense that it implicates America in involvement and that's why they cannot allow anyone to see it?

If it were Russia why hide that?


Yes, that makes sense and may be why it's so highly classified, except the SC Report says no Americans conspired with Russia. But it's looking like DNC and the keystone kops did conspire with Ukraine.




posted on Apr, 18 2019 @ 12:24 PM
link   
a reply to: EchoesInTime

Which Begs the Question .... If No Americans Conspired with Russia ..... How about any of our FiveEye'd friends ????

"The British are Coming, The British are Coming"




posted on Apr, 18 2019 @ 12:25 PM
link   
a reply to: crankyoldman

Thanks for the summary! In other words, nothing has changed legally or politically from 24 hours ago.

Time for the next chapter...time to turn the tables and expose the TRAITORS.



posted on Apr, 18 2019 @ 12:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: tiredoflooking
a reply to: crankyoldman

I get that people don't take Assange's word for it that it was Seth.

But why offer a reward also if it was the Russians why would Assange feel the need to detract from that?

Wikileaks would have taken leaks from Russia so what would they have to gain from inventing the Seth Rich story?


TOL, the biggest challenge here is looking through the prism that exists now - she didn't win. So things represented under the assumption that she would win, do not fit the current reality at all and look odd.

Russia was to be the devil in the HRC/Controller world. It was always to be so no matter what. Look here not there... That narrative still plays out, but looks utterly preposterous now. Had she won it would still make sense.

The russia russia russia narrative was built entirely on Russia being the devil (Russia being a vague term). To unravel it all now seems odd because they are not now - frankly were not prior to 2016 either.

As for the Wiki element, it was a political ideology system of information/control built on "Us against the bad guys - support us with donations, information and fists int the air". So events and information fit that narrative, as in the "reward". Part of the conflict now is clowns on Wiki, so our perception is getting mucked up on viewing the past Wikileaks representation.

Both narratives are collapsing. So both seem to no longer fit quite right. There will be so much more of this to come.



posted on Apr, 18 2019 @ 12:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: crankyoldman

Thanks for the summary! In other words, nothing has changed legally or politically from 24 hours ago.

Time for the next chapter...time to turn the tables and expose the TRAITORS.


Yes. Barr publicly said that he's looking into the things that came about during the SC effort etc. Why bother saying this? Why not say 'meh, this is all in the past, let's move on with MS13 and human trafficking?"

He said he's looking into the coup part. Since this is of the Treason/Sedition etc. nature it means only those who need to know will know. And our insider folks here have said folks are getting it... just quietly.

It is all good.



posted on Apr, 18 2019 @ 12:48 PM
link   
What would Assange gain by alluding to Seth Rich being his source, when the official story is saying Russia? Has Assange ever lied about a source in the past? What would be the point of covering up that they came from Russia, when he probably knew it would be investigated and the ultimate source would be found?

The SC alluded that Guccifer 2.0 and DC Leaks are Russian operations. In the case of DC Leaks I do not find that to be authentic. Didnt it come out that DC Leaks was created by some guy in Broward County Florida? I seem to remember reading that this same guy had already created a website called Broward Leaks or something to that effect before he created DC Leaks.

It doesnt seem like they did much true investigating at all regarding the emails, and just went with the already created FBI official story of Russian hackers.



posted on Apr, 18 2019 @ 12:52 PM
link   
"Game Over"

"Game"

Q#2207



ABUSE OF POWER?

SLEEP NO MORE?
THE AMERICAN PEOPLE (& OTHERS AROUND THE WORLD) ARE AWAKENING.
PANIC?
GAME OVER.


See the bigger picture here. The investigation is over.

DJT today: No Collusion No Obstruction.

He is NOT talking about the past - he is talking about now. He is free, the game playing RE: SC/Mueller is over. The evidence has been vetted by: everyone on the planet who opposes. Done.





posted on Apr, 18 2019 @ 01:07 PM
link   
After reading the Mueller report conclusion regarding obstruction of justice, I am convinced that the purpose of that portion of the report is to give reason for (bait?) Democrats to pursue impeachment over obstruction of justice.

If they do, then we get to watch the Dems gin up their base, only to lead them into ultimate destruction when FISA declassification occurs.

Maybe?



posted on Apr, 18 2019 @ 01:08 PM
link   
a reply to: butcherguy

Yep. I think we can all be assured that this was an Andrew Weissman production. There is only paragraph in particular that was included to leave the door open for impeachment.



posted on Apr, 18 2019 @ 01:14 PM
link   
Is there a summary somewhere of the Q story timeline? I thought The entire Q stuff was that Mueller wasn’t really investigating Trump, but was working to uncover some other mess. Or, have we long ago moved along from that story?



posted on Apr, 18 2019 @ 01:16 PM
link   
Doubling Down



Last year I asked the question: What person would be the best vindicator of DJT?

My good friend Sky jumped in straight way with Mueller of course.

They are going to try the "it is a yes or no question" thing here? Too funny.


I see Adam Schiff's twitter is "@Adam Schiff" Here: @[Adam Schiff] fixed it for you.


edit on 18-4-2019 by crankyoldman because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 18 2019 @ 01:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: vinifalou
Trump was too naive to allow such bad apples in his campaign. Page, Manafort, all these people joined the campaign with the objective of undermining it. Page had plenty of contacts with the Russians before he volunteered for the campaign.

I think being on his first run, Trump was still kinda innocent and/or skeptical on how evil these people are and how they'll do almost anything to make things go their way. Let's hope this doesn't happen again.

Interestingly, Carter Page section is heavily redacted for "Grand Jury" reasons...

Mhmmm. FISA declass incoming?


Lol probably because it says the investigation proved he was Male-1 in the Russian spies 2013 story and likely the “energy analyst” who put recording devices in binders to trap Russian spies, therefore kind of unlikely to be a Russian spy himself. But you know, those “Russian ties” a couple years later made good data for a bad FISA warrant and a ton of BS news articles.



posted on Apr, 18 2019 @ 01:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: butcherguy
After reading the Mueller report conclusion regarding obstruction of justice, I am convinced that the purpose of that portion of the report is to give reason for (bait?) Democrats to pursue impeachment over obstruction of justice.

If they do, then we get to watch the Dems gin up their base, only to lead them into ultimate destruction when FISA declassification occurs.

Maybe?


Used this section as the basis...



Funny, sure seems to be an exact definition of the publicly stated HRC actions. Care to weigh in on that BS JC???



posted on Apr, 18 2019 @ 01:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: ucanthandlethetruth

originally posted by: vinifalou
Trump was too naive to allow such bad apples in his campaign. Page, Manafort, all these people joined the campaign with the objective of undermining it. Page had plenty of contacts with the Russians before he volunteered for the campaign.

I think being on his first run, Trump was still kinda innocent and/or skeptical on how evil these people are and how they'll do almost anything to make things go their way. Let's hope this doesn't happen again.

Interestingly, Carter Page section is heavily redacted for "Grand Jury" reasons...

Mhmmm. FISA declass incoming?


Lol probably because it says the investigation proved he was Male-1 in the Russian spies 2013 story and likely the “energy analyst” who put recording devices in binders to trap Russian spies, therefore kind of unlikely to be a Russian spy himself. But you know, those “Russian ties” a couple years later made good data for a bad FISA warrant and a ton of BS news articles.

Carter Page was an FBI asset working against the Russians, until they decided to retroactively make him a Russian spy in the FISA warrant. It's being reported Mueller found no evidence against Page.



posted on Apr, 18 2019 @ 01:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan

originally posted by: ucanthandlethetruth

originally posted by: vinifalou
Trump was too naive to allow such bad apples in his campaign. Page, Manafort, all these people joined the campaign with the objective of undermining it. Page had plenty of contacts with the Russians before he volunteered for the campaign.

I think being on his first run, Trump was still kinda innocent and/or skeptical on how evil these people are and how they'll do almost anything to make things go their way. Let's hope this doesn't happen again.

Interestingly, Carter Page section is heavily redacted for "Grand Jury" reasons...

Mhmmm. FISA declass incoming?


Lol probably because it says the investigation proved he was Male-1 in the Russian spies 2013 story and likely the “energy analyst” who put recording devices in binders to trap Russian spies, therefore kind of unlikely to be a Russian spy himself. But you know, those “Russian ties” a couple years later made good data for a bad FISA warrant and a ton of BS news articles.

Carter Page was an FBI asset working against the Russians, until they decided to retroactively make him a Russian spy in the FISA warrant. It's being reported Mueller found no evidence against Page.


Yeah, I’ve wondered at times if Page is just continuing to play the part of the scapegoat/fool, acting out his part, or if he didn’t know people in Obama admin were going to turn his history of helping the FBI with Russia against him to get the FISA.

Which the FISA and it’s 2 hops and Page hanging out in the Starbucks Trump Tower using their WiFi frequently gave turn Trump without needing a FISA on Trump. Probably that one FISA on Page gave them the whole Tower building.

Weird how the media doesn’t explain how FISA hops work now, when they breathlessly reported all about it during Snowden revelations.



posted on Apr, 18 2019 @ 01:29 PM
link   
a reply to: crankyoldman

They will never be able to prove intent in an obstruction case and they know it. Thats why they did not recommend obstruction charges. Looking at it as objectively and open as possible, I do not see how they could continue with an obstruction case when the case he was supposedly obstructing was ruled to be B.S.



posted on Apr, 18 2019 @ 02:05 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Apr, 18 2019 @ 02:06 PM
link   
a reply to: PokeyJoe

Even though Bob Mueller concluded that there was not enough evidence to bring obstruction charges against President Trump, Shepard Smith is right now passionately reading all the obstruction bullet points and urging Congress to act on them. I will rejoice when Shepard Smith is exposed as one of the traitors.



posted on Apr, 18 2019 @ 02:17 PM
link   


194

It will be interesting to see how the resistance spins this as this memory fail happens well before the May SC creation and JC firing and merits nothing of note here. They've raged that Flynn is their smocking gun, but fail to explain how this is a thing.

Since no Americans were involved in russia russia russia...



posted on Apr, 18 2019 @ 02:23 PM
link   
a reply to: crankyoldman

Maybe I'm missing something here?
He lied about having the conversation with a Russian after the election? Trump has already president-elect? Why would he lie about something that was perfectly legal and necessary?

It just doesn't make a lick of sense I'll tell you




top topics



 
142
<< 79  80  81    83  84  85 >>

log in

join