posted on May, 29 2019 @ 10:56 AM
All they have left;
To convince us to believe that we should be more concerned with the potential evidence that Russia hacked/released Clinton and co. emails, than we
should be concerned with what exactly was found in the emails that “damaged” her candidacy.
Basically their argument:
It’s none of your business what we do that is supposed to be kept private- and the real enemy is the entity that takes away that privacy from us.
If you’re going to implement a system like this then you better be prepared to live in a glass house yourself, when using it. That means you can’t
coordinate spirit cooking dinners through your work communications.
Ten years ago the idea that a system like this exists was called paranoia. Now it’s being highly contested and fought by the people who created the
damn system in the first place. How many “conspiracy theorists” have been damaged beyond repair simply because of their beliefs? But paying
penance to the richest family to have ever existed? Ignore it. At all costs.
What a waste of time.
Call me when somebody gets the balls to ask why all of these prominent people in power dine with severed baby doll heads covered in ketchup as their
Because what exactly else is it that “damaged” her candidacy so badly? More badly than calling half the country deplorable? What could possibly
damage her more than that?
The precedent that will be set here is that they really do believe their own system shouldn’t apply to them. How many regular ole citizens are
defamed and slandered bc of a
Social media post or picture of them wielding a weapon or blowing smoke alluding to drugs, etc. many have lost jobs over such “discoveries”
The content of the emails and what was discovered through that is as important to me as the discovery that Trump was illegally spied on justified by
lies found on the internet. Truth found in hacked emails and it’s now being fought using the idea that it was illegally obtained.
Projection. Projection. Projection.